8 research outputs found

    Expression domains of common response genes and symptoms associated with infection

    No full text
    GFP. In contrast, no GFP expression or vacuolization was seen in the intestines of non-infected worms.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Genome-wide investigation reveals pathogen-specific and shared signatures in the response of to infection"</p><p>http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/9/R194</p><p>Genome Biology 2007;8(9):R194-R194.</p><p>Published online 17 Sep 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2375032.</p><p></p

    Tablet-based method for real-time assay modification by hand drawing.

    No full text
    <p><b>(a)</b> Schematic of sequence, resulting in projection of manual tablet input to create PEG-DA features on the substrate. In this case, the scale of the hand drawing is reduced 50X. <b>(b)</b> Video frames of the photopatterning of a series of dots drawn by the researcher to confine a worm inside a spiral frame (<b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0145935#pone.0145935.s013" target="_blank">S3 Video</a></b>). The system projects each feature drawn by the researcher after a delay of 0.25 seconds.</p

    Comparison of host gene expression profiles following infection with different pathogens

    No full text
    Expression levels are indicated by a color scale and represent normalized differences between infected and control animals. Grey denotes genes not considered to be differentially regulated under that condition. The numbers on the vertical axis correspond to differentially regulated genes. Each column shows the expression levels of individual genes (represented as rows) following infection by the pathogens as indicated on the horizontal axis (, ; , ; , ; , ). Genes differentially regulated in an infection with and their comparative expression levels with other pathogens. Genes defining a pathogen-specific signature specifically up-regulated with infection. Groupings, as indicated by the horizontal bars, formed after clustering using non-redundant sets of genes that were up- and down-regulated by at least two pathogens (trees not shown). Genes commonly up-regulated following , and infections.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Genome-wide investigation reveals pathogen-specific and shared signatures in the response of to infection"</p><p>http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/9/R194</p><p>Genome Biology 2007;8(9):R194-R194.</p><p>Published online 17 Sep 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2375032.</p><p></p

    Dynamic photopatterning method and implementation.

    No full text
    <p><b>(a)</b> Sequence, including real-time image capture and decision-based projection of the next fabrication step. <b>(b)</b> Schematic of the dynamic photopatterning system and configuration for patterning agar plates during <i>C</i>. <i>elegans</i> culture. Photo of the system is shown in <b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0145935#pone.0145935.s002" target="_blank">S1 Fig</a></b>. <b>(c)</b> An example of a framed micropillar array formed around a <i>C</i>. <i>elegans</i> worm <i>in situ</i>.</p

    <i>In situ</i> photopolymerization of microstructures resulting in physical confinement of a <i>C</i>. <i>elegans</i>.

    No full text
    <p><b>(a)</b> Three exemplary assays built sequentially (from left to right): an open frame, an array of micropillars (100 μm diameter), and a rippled microchannel (approx. 200 μm wide). <b>(b)</b> Tracking of the worm motion over a time period of 200s, within the pillar array. <b>(c)</b> Box-whisker plots of velocity in each configuration, showing that sequential confinement increases the maximum velocity at which the worm pushes against the surface of features. <b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0145935#pone.0145935.s011" target="_blank">S1 Video</a></b> shows the experiment.</p

    Fabrication of maze assays as a test case of <i>C</i>. <i>elegans</i> decision-making behavior.

    No full text
    <p><b>(a)</b> Array of T-shaped mazes. The observed ripples are part of the agar surface. <b>(b)</b> T-shaped PEG-DA microchannel, with dot sequence indicating the centroid position of the worm during a 30 second period. <b>(c)</b> Percentage of worms that ended at each leg of the maze after being inserted into the entrance of the maze. See <b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0145935#pone.0145935.s014" target="_blank">S4 Video</a></b> for video of a nematode solving a maze.</p

    Interaction between worms and a simple hinge-pin mechanism fabricated within a millimeter-scale area.

    No full text
    <p><b>(a)</b> Sequential frames show the lower worm contacting the hinge and extending its body, causing the hinge to rotate around the encapsulated pin. <b>(b)</b> Angle of the hinge with respect to vertical position plotted against time. Over six seconds the hinge rotates from 6° to 27°. <b>(c)</b> Schematics of worm motion as observed in the experiment, which is also shown in <b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0145935#pone.0145935.s012" target="_blank">S2 Video</a></b>. When the worm contacts two points spanning from the frame to the hinge, it extends its body, exerting force on the hinge and causing it to rotate. The motion cycle is repeated, rotating the hinge clockwise a small amount with each cycle.</p

    Resolution and exposure data for PEG-DA on agar.

    No full text
    <p><b>(a)</b> Optical images of fabricated test pattern (USAF 1951 pattern) used to determine line pair resolution, with examples (from left to right) of under-exposed, properly exposed, and over-exposed results. <b>(b)</b> Relationship between line pair resolution and feature height for different objective magnifications indicated in the legend. <b>(c)</b> Relationship between optimal exposure time and feature height, determined using smallest line pair fabricated in each case. <b>(d)</b> SEM images of T-mazes as used in <b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0145935#pone.0145935.g006" target="_blank">Fig 6</a></b>, including (from left to right) the full maze in the upper half and the projected mask overlaid in the lower half, the sub-image shows one leg of the maze, and the right sub-image shows the corner of a wall feature.</p
    corecore