Outcomes in patients with acute and stable coronary syndromes: insights from the prospective NOBORI-2 study

BACKGROUND: Contemporary data remains limited regarding mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for different manifestations of coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated mortality and MACE outcomes in patients treated with PCI for STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction), NSTEMI (non ST-elevation myocardial infarction) and stable angina through analysis of data derived from the Nobori-2 study. METHODS: Clinical endpoints were cardiac mortality and MACE (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization). RESULTS: 1909 patients who underwent PCI were studied; 1332 with stable angina, 248 with STEMI and 329 with NSTEMI. Age-adjusted Charlson co-morbidity index was greatest in the NSTEMI cohort (3.78±1.91) and lowest in the stable angina cohort (3.00±1.69); P<0.0001. Following Cox multivariate analysis cardiac mortality was independently worse in the NSTEMI vs the stable angina cohort (HR 2.31 (1.10-4.87), p = 0.028) but not significantly different for STEMI vs stable angina cohort (HR 0.72 (0.16-3.19), p = 0.67). Similar observations were recorded for MACE (<180 days) (NSTEMI vs stable angina: HR 2.34 (1.21-4.55), p = 0.012; STEMI vs stable angina: HR 2.19 (0.97-4.98), p = 0.061. CONCLUSIONS: The longer-term Cardiac mortality and MACE were significantly worse for patients following PCI for NSTEMI even after adjustment of clinical demographics and Charlson co-morbidity index whilst the longer-term prognosis of patients following PCI STEMI was favorable, with similar outcomes as those patients with stable angina following PCI

From biodegradable polymers to bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: available evidence in the current era of new-generation DES

New-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) encompass a large variety of coronary devices, featuring thin struts, biocompatible durable or biodegradable polymer coatings, and limus-eluting drugs. Due to improved early and long-term outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, new-generation metallic DES are recommended in almost all patient and lesion subsets. Available evidence from randomized trials indicate a similar safety and efficacy profile between biodegradable and durable polymers new-generation DES. Recently, polymer- free DES provided promising results particularly as alternative to bare-metal stents. Ultimately, although remaining conceptually solid, bioresorbable vascular scaffolds represent an immature technology owing to increased risk of thrombosis. In this review, we summarized current evidence about contemporary coronary devices

Lesion data (data presented per lesion.

<p>Lesion data (data presented per lesion.</p

Kaplan-Meier curve for cardiac death.

<p>Kaplan-Meier curve for cardiac death.</p

Clinical Demographics.

<p>*(without age scoring).</p

Clinical outcomes.

<p>Clinical outcomes.</p