Processo de trabalho e sofrimento psíquico de médicos da atenção primária na pandemia do covid-19

The organization and the work process are privileged spaces to recognize the forces that lead to psychic suffering. This article aims to analyze the perceptions of physicians of primary health care, who work in the More Doctors Program, on the relationship between psychic suffering and work process, in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. This research was carried out with a case study, using methods and qualitative techniques for the collection, description, and analysis of the data. An intentional sample was selected in accordance with the theoretical saturation technique. The collection of information was carried out semi-structured interviews, following a script built to meet the objectives of this research. The analysis of the interviewee’s discourse articulated categories of analysis drawn from five thematic axes that have points of articulation between them, with consensus and contradictions that give meaning to the visions and positions of the actors in the field of health. The results evidenced the pandemic as a health and traumatic catastrophe, resizing the work process and contributing to overload, conflicts, fear, feeling of helplessness, and psychic suffering. Numerous shortcomings, infrastructure problems, bureaucracy, political interference, mismatch between training and practice also contributed to this suffering.A organização e o processo de trabalho são espaços privilegiados para reconhecer as forças que levam ao sofrimento psíquico. Este artigo pretende analisar as percepções de médicos(as) da atenção primária à saúde, que atuam no Programa Mais Médicos, sobre as relações entre sofrimento psíquico e processo de trabalho, no contexto da pandemia do coronavirus. Esta pesquisa foi realizada por meio de um estudo de caso, utilizando métodos e técnicas qualitativas para a coleta, descrição e análise dos dados. Foi selecionada uma amostra intencional em conformidade com a técnica de saturação teórica. A coleta de informações foi realizada com ajuda de entrevistas semiestruturadas, seguindo um roteiro construído para atender aos objetivos desta pesquisa. A análise do discurso dos entrevistados articulou categorias de análise extraidas de cinco eixos temáticos que têm pontos de articulação entre si, com consensos e contradições que dão sentido às visões e posições dos atores no campo da saúde. Os resultados evidenciaram a pandemia como catástrofe sanitária e traumática, redimensionando o processo de trabalho e contribuindo para a sobrecarga, conflitos, medo, sentimento de desamparo e sofrimento psíquico. Inúmeras carências, problemas de infraestrutura, burocracia, interferências políticas, descompasso entre a formação e a prática também contribuiram para esse sofrimento

NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES: a data set on carnivore distribution in the Neotropics

Mammalian carnivores are considered a key group in maintaining ecological health and can indicate potential ecological integrity in landscapes where they occur. Carnivores also hold high conservation value and their habitat requirements can guide management and conservation plans. The order Carnivora has 84 species from 8 families in the Neotropical region: Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Otariidae; Phocidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae. Herein, we include published and unpublished data on native terrestrial Neotropical carnivores (Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae). NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES is a publicly available data set that includes 99,605 data entries from 35,511 unique georeferenced coordinates. Detection/non-detection and quantitative data were obtained from 1818 to 2018 by researchers, governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and private consultants. Data were collected using several methods including camera trapping, museum collections, roadkill, line transect, and opportunistic records. Literature (peer-reviewed and grey literature) from Portuguese, Spanish and English were incorporated in this compilation. Most of the data set consists of detection data entries (n = 79,343; 79.7%) but also includes non-detection data (n = 20,262; 20.3%). Of those, 43.3% also include count data (n = 43,151). The information available in NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES will contribute to macroecological, ecological, and conservation questions in multiple spatio-temporal perspectives. As carnivores play key roles in trophic interactions, a better understanding of their distribution and habitat requirements are essential to establish conservation management plans and safeguard the future ecological health of Neotropical ecosystems. Our data paper, combined with other large-scale data sets, has great potential to clarify species distribution and related ecological processes within the Neotropics. There are no copyright restrictions and no restriction for using data from this data paper, as long as the data paper is cited as the source of the information used. We also request that users inform us of how they intend to use the data

Geoeconomic variations in epidemiology, ventilation management, and outcomes in invasively ventilated intensive care unit patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pooled analysis of four observational studies

Background: Geoeconomic variations in epidemiology, the practice of ventilation, and outcome in invasively ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain unexplored. In this analysis we aim to address these gaps using individual patient data of four large observational studies. Methods: In this pooled analysis we harmonised individual patient data from the ERICC, LUNG SAFE, PRoVENT, and PRoVENT-iMiC prospective observational studies, which were conducted from June, 2011, to December, 2018, in 534 ICUs in 54 countries. We used the 2016 World Bank classification to define two geoeconomic regions: middle-income countries (MICs) and high-income countries (HICs). ARDS was defined according to the Berlin criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patients in MICs versus HICs. The primary outcome was the use of low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for the first 3 days of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were key ventilation parameters (tidal volume size, positive end-expiratory pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, peak pressure, plateau pressure, driving pressure, and respiratory rate), patient characteristics, the risk for and actual development of acute respiratory distress syndrome after the first day of ventilation, duration of ventilation, ICU length of stay, and ICU mortality. Findings: Of the 7608 patients included in the original studies, this analysis included 3852 patients without ARDS, of whom 2345 were from MICs and 1507 were from HICs. Patients in MICs were younger, shorter and with a slightly lower body-mass index, more often had diabetes and active cancer, but less often chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure than patients from HICs. Sequential organ failure assessment scores were similar in MICs and HICs. Use of LTVV in MICs and HICs was comparable (42·4% vs 44·2%; absolute difference -1·69 [-9·58 to 6·11] p=0·67; data available in 3174 [82%] of 3852 patients). The median applied positive end expiratory pressure was lower in MICs than in HICs (5 [IQR 5-8] vs 6 [5-8] cm H2O; p=0·0011). ICU mortality was higher in MICs than in HICs (30·5% vs 19·9%; p=0·0004; adjusted effect 16·41% [95% CI 9·52-23·52]; p<0·0001) and was inversely associated with gross domestic product (adjusted odds ratio for a US$10 000 increase per capita 0·80 [95% CI 0·75-0·86]; p<0·0001). Interpretation: Despite similar disease severity and ventilation management, ICU mortality in patients without ARDS is higher in MICs than in HICs, with a strong association with country-level economic status