21 research outputs found
Iranian Kurdish refugees in the Kurdistan region of Iraq (KRI)
"As a result of the fact-finding mission in March 2011 the DIS publish two separate reports of which the report at hand is devoted the situation of Iranian Kurdish refugees in KRI. The other report is
devoted to updated information on entry and residence procedures in KRI. Regarding the situation of Iranian Kurdish refugees, the mission exclusively focused on collecting information about the refugees who had previously lived in Al-Tash Refugee Camp near Al-Rumadi
in Al-Anbar Province. As the majority of these refugees were relocated to Barika and Kawa refugee camps in KRI in 2005 the main focus of the report at hand is on the situation of Iranian refugees residing in Barika and Kawa camps in KRI. The report focuses on issues concerning the situation of Iranian Kurdish refugees, including residence, integration into the KRI society, the attitude of the KRG authorities and the local
community toward the refugees, security and risk of refoulement. Furthermore, the report provides a brief insight into the living conditions in Barika and Kawa refugee camps.
Vaccination status and needs of asylum-seeking children in Denmark: a retrospective data analysis.
OBJECTIVES: Asylum seekers to Europe may come from war-torn countries where health systems have broken down, and there is evidence that asylum-seeking children have low coverage of childhood vaccinations, as well as uptake of immunisations in host countries. Such gaps in immunisation have important implications for effective national vaccination programmes. How we approach vaccination in children and adults entering Western Europe, where as a group they face barriers to health services and screening, is a growing debate; however, there are limited data on the vaccination status of these hard-to-reach communities, and robust evidence is needed to inform immunisation strategies. The aim of this study was to explore the vaccination status and needs of asylum-seeking children and adolescents in Denmark. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective data analysis of anonymised patient records for asylum-seeking children and adolescents extracted from the Danish Red Cross database. METHODS: We retrospectively searched the Danish Red Cross database for children and adolescents (aged 3 months-17 years) with active asylum applications in Denmark as of October 28, 2015. Data were extracted for demographic characteristics, vaccination status and vaccinations needed by asylum-seeking children presenting to Red Cross asylum centres for routine statutory health screening. RESULTS: We explored the vaccination status and needs of 2126 asylum-seeking children and adolescents. About 64% of the study population were male and 36% were female. Eight nationalities were represented, where 33% of the total of children and adolescents were not immunised in accordance with Danish national guidelines, while 7% were considered partly vaccinated, and 60% were considered adequately vaccinated. Afghan (57% not vaccinated/unknown) and Eritrean (54% not vaccinated/unknown) children were the least likely to be vaccinated of all nationalities represented, as were boys (37% not vaccinated/unknown) compared with girls (27% not vaccinated/unknown) and children and adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years (48% not vaccinated/unknown) compared with 6- to 11-year olds (26%) and 0- to 5-year olds (22%). The health screenings resulted in 1328 vaccinations. The most commonly needed vaccines were diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b, (DTaP/IPV/Hib) which comprised 49% of the vaccines distributed, followed by the pneumococcal vaccine (Prevnar) (28%) and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine (23%). CONCLUSIONS: The finding that nearly one-third of asylum-seeking children and adolescents in Denmark were in need of further vaccinations highlights the gaps in immunisation coverage in these populations. These results point to the need to improve access to health services and promote national vaccine programmes targeted at these communities to facilitate vaccination uptake and increase immunisation coverage to reduce the risk of preventable infectious diseases among asylum-seeking children
How do general practitioners experience providing care to refugees with mental health problems? A qualitative study from Denmark
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Inequalities in mortality among refugees and immigrants compared to native Danes – a historical prospective cohort study
Providing medical care for undocumented migrants in Denmark: what are the challenges for health professionals?
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The rights of undocumented migrants are frequently overlooked. Denmark has ratified several international conventions recognizing the right to health care for all human beings, but has very scanty legislation and no existing policies for providing health care to undocumented migrants. This study focuses on how health professionals navigate and how they experience providing treatment for undocumented migrants in the Danish health care system.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The study was carried out as part of an EU-project on European Best Practices in Access, Quality and Appropriateness of Health Services for Immigrants in Europe (EUGATE). This presentation is based on 12 semi-structured interviews with general practitioners (9) and emergency room physicians (3) in Denmark.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The emergency room physicians express that treatment of undocumented migrants is no different from the treatment of any other person. However, care may become more complicated due to lack of previous medical records and contact persons. Contrary to this, general practitioners explain that undocumented migrants will encounter formal barriers when trying to obtain treatment. Additional problems in the treatment of undocumented migrants include language issues, financial aspects for general practitioners, concerns about how to handle the situation including possibilities of further referrals, and an uncertainty as to whether to involve the police.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The health professionals in our study describe that undocumented migrants experience an unequal access to primary care facilities and that great uncertainties exist amongst health professionals as how to respond in such situations. The lack of official policies concerning the right to health care for undocumented migrants continue to pass on the responsibility to health professionals and, thereby, leaves it up to the individual to decide whether treatment can be obtained or not.</p
Iranian Kurdish refugees in the Kurdistan region of Iraq (KRI)
"As a result of the fact-finding mission in March 2011 the DIS publish two separate reports of which the report at hand is devoted the situation of Iranian Kurdish refugees in KRI. The other report is
devoted to updated information on entry and residence procedures in KRI. Regarding the situation of Iranian Kurdish refugees, the mission exclusively focused on collecting information about the refugees who had previously lived in Al-Tash Refugee Camp near Al-Rumadi
in Al-Anbar Province. As the majority of these refugees were relocated to Barika and Kawa refugee camps in KRI in 2005 the main focus of the report at hand is on the situation of Iranian refugees residing in Barika and Kawa camps in KRI. The report focuses on issues concerning the situation of Iranian Kurdish refugees, including residence, integration into the KRI society, the attitude of the KRG authorities and the local
community toward the refugees, security and risk of refoulement. Furthermore, the report provides a brief insight into the living conditions in Barika and Kawa refugee camps.
Syria : Kurds, honour - killings and illegal departure : report from a fact finding mission to Damascus
Danish Immigration Servic
Channels of Entry and Preferred Destinations: The Circumvention of Denmark by Chinese Immigrants
Host or hostile? Attitudes towards asylum seekers in Israel and in Denmark
In this study, we focus on attitudes towards asylum seekers in two countries: Denmark and Israel. Both serve as interesting cases through which to study public sentiment of host populations for people seeking refuge. We examine the role of three core dimensions that have been relatively overlooked in previous studies: social contact with asylum seekers, the role of support for humanitarian policies and perceptions of legitimacy of the asylum seekers' claims. We also gauge the way perceptions of threat mediate the effect of these core dimensions on individuals' willingness to share their national benefits with those looking for refugee status in the two countries. For the analysis, we use multiple group structural equation modelling. On the descriptive level, findings suggest that respondents are considerably more hostile in Israel than in Denmark, although the mechanisms leading to the formation of exclusionary attitudes are partly similar. We conclude with some limitations of the study and closing remarks about similarities and differences across the two countries