19 research outputs found

    Safety and Efficacy of Three Variants of Canaloplasty with Phacoemulsification to Treat Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cataract: 12-Month Follow-Up

    No full text
    Background: A single-center prospective randomized observational study to compare three types of canaloplasty, i.e., ab externo (ABeC), minicanaloplasty (miniABeC) and ab interno, (ABiC) combined with cataract surgery in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients over 12 months. Methods: 48 POAG patients underwent one of three canaloplasty procedures: ABeC (16 eyes), miniABeC (16 eyes) or ABiC (16 eyes) or combined with phacoemulsification. Patients were assessed at baseline, at day 0–1–7 and at month 1–3–6–12. Successful treatment was defined as unmedicated IOP reduction ≥20%. Complete surgical success was defined as an IOP ≤ 15 mmHg without medications, and a qualified surgical success as IOP ≤ 15 mmHg with or without medications. Results: Pre-washout IOP median values (mmHg) were 17 (ABeC), 18 (miniABeC) and 17 (AbiC) and decreased at 12-month follow up postoperatively to 13 (p = 0.005), 13 (p = 0.004) and 14 (p = 0.008), respectively—successful treatment was achieved in approximately 100% of patients for ABeC and in 93.8% for both miniABeC and AbiC groups. Preoperatively, the median number of medications was 2.0 (range 1–3) (ABeC), 2.0 (1–3) (miniABeC) and 2.0 (0–4) (ABiC); 12-month post-operatively, all medications were withdrawn except in two patients (followed miniABeC and AbiC). Conclusions: The three variants of canaloplasty significantly reduced IOP and the number of medications in patients with mild to moderate POAG and gave no significant complications

    Wavelet Representation of the Corneal Pulse for Detecting Ocular Dicrotism

    No full text
    <div><p>Purpose</p><p>To develop a reliable and powerful method for detecting the ocular dicrotism from non-invasively acquired signals of corneal pulse without the knowledge of the underlying cardiopulmonary information present in signals of ocular blood pulse and the electrical heart activity.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Retrospective data from a study on glaucomatous and age-related changes in corneal pulsation [PLOS ONE 9(7),(2014):e102814] involving 261 subjects was used. Continuous wavelet representation of the signal derivative of the corneal pulse was considered with a complex Gaussian derivative function chosen as mother wavelet. Gray-level Co-occurrence Matrix has been applied to the image (heat-maps) of CWT to yield a set of parameters that can be used to devise the ocular dicrotic pulse detection schemes based on the Conditional Inference Tree and the Random Forest models. The detection scheme was first tested on synthetic signals resembling those of a dicrotic and a non-dicrotic ocular pulse before being used on all 261 real recordings.</p><p>Results</p><p>A detection scheme based on a single feature of the Continuous Wavelet Transform of the corneal pulse signal resulted in a low detection rate. Conglomeration of a set of features based on measures of texture (homogeneity, correlation, energy, and contrast) resulted in a high detection rate reaching 93%.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>It is possible to reliably detect a dicrotic ocular pulse from the signals of corneal pulsation without the need of acquiring additional signals related to heart activity, which was the previous state-of-the-art. The proposed scheme can be applied to other non-stationary biomedical signals related to ocular dynamics.</p></div

    Corneal pulsation and biomechanics during induced ocular pulse. An ex-vivo pilot study.

    No full text
    The purpose of this study was to ascertain the relationships between the amplitude of the corneal pulse (CP) signal and the parameters of corneal biomechanics during ex-vivo intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation experiments on porcine eyes with artificially induced ocular pulse cycles. Two experiments were carried out using porcine eyes. In the first one, a selected eye globe was subjected to three IOP levels (15, 30 and 45 mmHg), where changes in physical ocular pulse amplitude were controlled by infusion/withdrawal volumes (ΔV). In the second experiment, six eyes were subjected to IOP from 15 mmHg to 45 mmHg in steps of 5 mmHg with a constant ΔV, where corneal deformation parameters were measured using Corvis ST. In both experiments, at each IOP, the CP and IOP signals were acquired synchronically using a non-contact ultrasonic distance sensor and a pressure transmitter, respectively. Based on the amplitudes of the CP and IOP signals ocular pulse based corneal rigidity index (OPCRI) was calculated. Results indicate positive correlations between ΔV and the physical ocular pulse amplitude, and between ΔV and the corneal pulse amplitude (both p < 0.001). OPCRI was found to increase with elevated IOP. Furthermore, IOP statistically significantly differentiated changes in OPCRI, the amplitudes of CP and IOP signals and in most of the corneal deformation parameters (p < 0.05). The partial correlation analysis, with IOP as a control variable, revealed a significant correlation between the length of the flattened cornea during the first applanation (A1L) and the corneal pulse amplitude (p = 0.002), and between A1L and OPCRI (p = 0.003). In conclusion, this study proved that natural corneal pulsations, detected with a non-contact ultrasonic technique, reflect pressure-volume dynamics and can potentially be utilized to assess stiffness of the cornea. The proposed new rigidity index could be a simple approach to estimating corneal rigidity

    Example of a mother wavelet function.

    No full text
    <p>From top: (A) complex Gaussian derivative mother wavelet <i>f</i>(<i>t</i>) = (−2<i>x</i>−<i>i</i>)exp(−<i>x</i><sup>2</sup>−<i>ix</i>), (B) example wavelet of scale <i>s</i> = 21, (C) example wavelet of scale <i>s</i> = 51.</p

    Glaucomatous and Age-Related Changes in Corneal Pulsation Shape. The Ocular Dicrotism

    No full text
    <div><p>Purpose</p><p>To ascertain whether the incidence of ocular dicrotic pulse (ODP) increases with age, it is more pronounced in glaucomatous than in normal eyes and whether it is related to cardiovascular activity.</p><p>Methods</p><p>261 subjects aged 47 to 78 years were included in the study and classified into four groups: primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), glaucoma suspects with glaucomatous optic disc appearance (GODA) and the controls (CG). Additionally, in each group, subjects with ODP were divided into two age subgroups around the median age. A non-contact ultrasonic method was used to measure corneal indentation pulse (CIP) synchronically with the acquisition of electrocardiography (ECG) and blood pulse signals. ODP was assessed from the acquired signals that were numerically processed in a custom written program.</p><p>Results</p><p>ODP incidence was about 78%, 66%, 66% and 84% for CG, GODA, POAG, and PACG group, respectively. With advancing age, the ODP incidence increased for all subjects (Δ = 12%), the highest being for the PACG and POAG groups (Δ = 30%). GODA group did not show an age-related increase in the incidence of ODP.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The ocular dicrotism, measured with non-contact ultrasonic method, was found to be a common phenomenon in elderly subjects. The increased ODP incidence in PACG and POAG group may correspond to either higher stiffness of glaucoma eyes, biochemical abnormalities in eye tissues, changes in ocular hemodynamics, may reflect the effect of medications or be a combination of all those factors. The results of GODA group suggest different mechanisms governing their ocular pulse that makes them less susceptible to generating ODP and having decreased predisposition to glaucoma.</p></div

    Application of Continuous Wavelet Transform to example non-dicrotic (on the left) and dicrotic (on the right) signals.

    No full text
    <p>From top: (A) raw signal, (B) modulus of the wavelet transform, (C) phase of the wavelet transform.</p

    Examples of visualization of 1 Hz (on the left) and composite 1 Hz + 2 Hz harmonic signal (on the right).

    No full text
    <p>From top: (A) raw signal, (B) modulus of the wavelet transform, (C) phase of the wavelet transform.</p
    corecore