Understanding Emoji Ambiguity in Context: The Role of Text in Emoji-Related Miscommunication

Recent studies have found that people interpret emoji characters inconsistently, creating significant potential for miscommunication. However, this research examined emoji in isolation, without consideration of any surrounding text. Prior work has hypothesized that examining emoji in their natural textual contexts would substantially reduce potential for miscommunication. To investigate this hypothesis, we carried out a controlled study with 2,482 participants who interpreted emoji both in isolation and in multiple textual contexts. After comparing the variability of emoji interpretation in each condition, we found that our results do not support the hypothesis in prior work: when emoji are interpreted in textual contexts, the potential for miscommunication appears to be roughly the same. We also identify directions for future research to better understand the interplay between emoji and textual context

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of epi-off corneal cross-linking in patients with thin corneas due to keratectasia

Background: Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is a safe and effective procedure for slowing keratectasia progression in eyes with a corneal thickness of at least 400 µm. Limited research has evaluated the safety and efficacy of epi-off CXL in corneas thinner than 400 µm. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of CXL to slow keratectasia progression in eyes with 1 D of K max steepening. No patients required keratoplasty and there were no cases of endothelial failure in the follow-up period. Conclusion: This research supports the safety and efficacy of epi-off, iso-osmolar CXL in eyes with <400 μm baseline corneal thickness with no patients requiring penetrating or endothelial keratoplasty, a trend toward improvement in BCVA, and K max flattening. In the future, prospective studies would be helpful to confirm these findings

Accuracy of partial coherence interferometry in patients with large inter-eye axial length difference.

BackgroundTo determine accuracy of partial coherence interferometry (PCI) in patients with large inter-eye axial eye length (AEL) difference.MethodsPatients undergoing cataract surgery at two academic medical centers with an inter-eye axial eye length (AEL) difference of > 0.30 mm were identified and were matched to control patients without inter-eye AEL difference > 0.30 mm on the basis of age, sex, and AEL. The expected post-operative refraction for the implanted IOL was calculated using SRK/T, Holladay II, and Hoffer Q formulae. The main outcome measures were the refractive prediction error and the equivalence of the refractive outcomes between the subjects and controls.ResultsReview of 2212 eyes from 1617 patients found 131 eyes of 93 patients which met inclusion criteria. These were matched to 131 control eyes of 115 patients. The mean AEL was 24.92 ± 1.50 mm. The mean absolute error (MAE) ranged from 0.47 D to 0.69 D, and was not statistically different between subjects and controls. The refractive prediction error was equivalent between the cases and controls, with no significant difference between the MAE for any formula, nor in the number of cases vs. controls with a refractive prediction error of at least 0.50 D or 1.00 D.ConclusionsAmong eyes in our study population, good-quality PCI data was equally accurate in patients with or without an inter-eye AEL difference > 0.30 mm. Confirmatory AEL measurements using different AEL measuring modalities in patients with a large inter-eye AEL difference may not be necessary