Role of nutrition in liver transplantation for end-stage chronic liver disease

Patients with end-stage liver disease often reveal significant protein-energy malnutrition, which may deteriorate after listing for transplantation. Since malnutrition affects post-transplant survival, precise assessment must be an integral part of pre- and post-surgical management. While there is wide agreement that aggressive treatment of nutritional deficiencies is required, strong scientific evidence supporting nutritional therapy is sparse. In practice, oral nutritional supplements are preferred over parenteral nutrition, but enteral tube feeding may be necessary to maintain adequate calorie intake. Protein restriction should be avoided and administration of branched-chain amino acids may help yield a sufficient protein supply. Specific problems such as micronutrient deficiency, fluid balance, cholestasis, encephalopathy, and comorbid conditions need attention in order to optimize patient outcom

Validation of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) Score in Liver Surgery

Background: The estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) has been used to produce a numerical estimate of expected mortality and morbidity after elective gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of this study was to validate E-PASS in a selected cohort of patients requiring liver resections (LR). Methods: In this retrospective study, E-PASS predictor equations for morbidity and mortality were applied to the prospective data from 243 patients requiring LR. The observed rates were compared with predicted rates using Fisher's exact test. The discriminative capability of E-PASS was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The observed and predicted overall mortality rates were both 3.3% and the morbidity rates were 31.3 and 26.9%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the comprehensive risk scores for deceased and surviving patients (p=0.043). However, the scores for patients with or without complications were not significantly different (p=0.120). Subsequent ROC curve analysis revealed a poor predictive accuracy for morbidity. Conclusions: The E-PASS score seems to effectively predict mortality in this specific group of patients but is a poor predictor of complications. A new modified logistic regression might be required for LR in order to better predict the postoperative outcom

Loop Ileostomy Closure: Comparison of Cost Effectiveness between Suture and Stapler

Background: Closure of loop ileostomy can be safely performed using sutures or staplers. The aim of the present study was to compare the cost effectiveness of three different techniques. Methods: A total of 128 consecutive patients who underwent closure of loop ileostomy between January 2002 and December 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome parameter was operative cost. Results: Closure of ileostomy was performed in 66 patients with hand-sewn anastomosis, in 25 patients with stapler only, and in 37 patients with a combination of stapler and suture. There were no differences in terms of early and late postoperative complications. Operative time was significantly longer for "suture only” (101.4±26min) than for "stapler/suture” (−4.9min) and "stapler only” (−17.8min); the difference between the three groups is significant (p=0.05). Duration of hospital stay was not different among the three groups. Operative costs with "stapler/suture” (1,755.9±355.6 EUR) were significantly higher than with "suture only” (−254 EUR; p=0.001) and "stapler only” (−236 EUR; p=0.005). Conclusions: Operative time using the stapler only is significantly shorter than with hand-sewn anastomosis or combinations of stapler and suture. Operative costs are significantly higher for a procedure that includes suture and staple

Long-term Follow-up of Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Large Incisional Hernias

Background: Long-term results after laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias remain to be determined. The aim of this prospective study was to compare early and late complications between laparoscopic repair and open repair in patients with large incisional hernias. Methods: Only patients with a hernia diameter of ≥5cm were included in this study and were prospectively followed. We compared 56 patients who underwent open incisional hernia repair with 69 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. Median follow-up in the laparoscopic group was 32.5months (range 1-62months) and in the open group 65months (range 1-80months). Results: The demographic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the median hospital stay (6.0days, range 1-23days vs. 7.0days, range 1-67days; p=0.014) and incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) (5.8% vs. 26.8%; p=0.001) were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open surgery group. Bulging of the implanted mesh was observed in 17.4% in the laparoscopic group and in 7.1% in the open group (p=NS). The recurrence rate was 18% in the open group and 16% in the laparoscopic group (p=NS). Multivariate analysis revealed that width of the hernia ≥10cm, SSI, and BMI ≥30kg/m2 were significant risk factors for hernia recurrence. Conclusions: The incidence of SSIs was significantly lower after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. At long-term follow-up, the recurrence rate was not different between the two techniques. Abdominal bulging is a specific problem associated with laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias. Size of the hernia, BMI, and SSI are risk factors for hernia recurrence irrespective of the techniqu

Long-Term Quality of Life After Hepatic Resection: Health Is not Simply the Absence of Disease

Background: Due to advances in operative methods and perioperative care, mortality and morbidity following major hepatic resection have decreased substantially, making long-term quality of life (QoL) an increasingly prominent issue. We evaluated whether postoperative diagnosis was associated with long-term QoL and health in patients requiring hepatic surgery for benign or malignant disease. Methods: QoL was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 and the liver-specific QLQ-LMC21 module. Results: Between 2002 and 2006, 249 patients underwent hepatic surgery for malignant (76%) and benign (24%) conditions. One hundred thirty-five patients were available for QoL analysis after a mean of 26.5months. There was no statistical difference in global QoL scores between patients with malignant and benign diseases (p=0.367). Neither the extent of the resection (≥2 segments vs. <2 segments; p=0.975; OR=0.988; 95% CI=0.461-2.119) nor patient age had a significant influence on overall QoL (p=0.092). Conclusions: These results indicate that long-term QoL for patients who underwent liver resection for malignant disease is quite good and that a poor clinical prognosis does not seem to correlate with a poor Qo

Functional comparison of bone marrow-derived liver stem cells: Selection strategy for cell-based therapy

Several distinct subpopulations of bone marrow-derived liver progenitor cells were recently described. However, there is inadequate information comparing these subpopulations from a liver-function point of view. This study was undertaken to compare two subpopulations of liver progenitors: β2-microglobulin (β2m)-negative/Thy-1-positive cells, and liver progenitors obtained from the non-adherent cell fraction after a panning procedure. The cells were cultured under several conditions including high- and lowdose hepatocyte growth factor, various cellular densities, and different media. Growth characteristics, liver-specific metabolic capacity, and liver regeneration-associated gene expression were studied. Both isolation procedures yielded cells that produced albumin and metabolized ammonia into urea. The study demonstrated that the β2m-negative/Thy-1-positive cell fraction metabolized ammonia into urea more efficiently and produced a superior amount of albumin compared with the panned cell fraction. The β2m-negative/Thy-1-positive cell fraction could be optimal for the development of novel cell-based treatment strategies for congenital or acquired liver disease

Implantation of Prophylactic Nonabsorbable Intraperitoneal Mesh in Patients With Peritonitis Is Safe and Feasible

Background: Patients with peritonitis undergoing emergency laparotomy are at increased risk for postoperative open abdomen and incisional hernia. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh implantation compared with conventional abdominal wall closure in patients with peritonitis undergoing emergency laparotomy. Method: A matched case-control study was performed. To analyze a high-risk population for incisional hernia formation, only patients with at least two of the following risk factors were included: male sex, body mass index (BMI) >25kg/m2, malignant tumor, or previous abdominal incision. In 63 patients with peritonitis, a prophylactic nonabsorbable mesh was implanted intraperitoneally between 2005 and 2010. These patients were compared with 70 patients with the same risk factors and peritonitis undergoing emergency laparotomy over a 1-year period (2008) who underwent conventional abdominal closure without mesh implantation. Results: Demographic parameters, including sex, age, BMI, grade of intraabdominal infection, and operating time were comparable in the two groups. Incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) was not different between groups (61.9 vs. 60.3%; p=0.603). Enterocutaneous fistula occurred in three patients in the mesh group (4.8%) and in two patients in the control group (2.9%; p=0.667). The incidence of incisional hernia was significantly lower in the mesh group (2/63 patients) than in the control group (20/70 patients) (3.2 vs. 28.6%; p<0.001). Conclusions: Prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh can be safely implanted in patients with peritonitis. It significantly reduces the incidence of incisional hernia. The incidences of SSI and enterocutaneous fistula formation were similar to those seen with conventional abdominal closur

Operation time and body mass index are significant risk factors for surgical site infection in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: a multicenter study

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) in patients who underwent colorectal surgery is a common complication associated with increased morbidity and costs. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for SSI in laparoscopic sigmoid resection for benign disease. Methods: Using a multicenter database of the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery, we prospectively identified 4,488 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery between 1995 and 2008; of these, 2,571 patients who underwent sigmoid resection for benign disease were included. Uni- and multivariate analyses were used to determine risk factors for SSI. Results: The incidence of SSI was 3.5% (90/2,571). Among SSI patients, incisional superficial infections were found in 71%, incisional deep infections in 22%, and organ-space infections in 7%. Patients' age, underlying disease, and surgeons' experience had no impact on SSI. Multivariate analyses showed that operation time >240min (odds ratio [OR] 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.8), BMI≥27kg/m2 (OR 2.3 [1.3-4.5]), organ lesions (OR 7.9 [2.0-31.8]), and male gender (OR 2.3 [1.2-4.5]) were significant risk factors for SSI. Reoperations in the SSI group were significantly more frequent than in the Non-SSI group (30% vs. 3%; p240min, BMI ≥27kg/m2, organ lesions, and male gender. SSI was significantly associated with more reoperations, longer hospital stay, and higher mortality rat

The Impact of Patient Age ≥80 Years on Postoperative Outcomes and Treatment Costs Following Pancreatic Surgery.

As life expectancy is increasing, elderly patients are evaluated more frequently for resection of benign or malignant pancreatic lesions. However, the impact of age on postoperative morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs in octogenarian patients (≥80 years) undergoing major pancreatic surgery needs further investigation. The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery between January 2015 and March 2019 in a major hepatopancreatobiliary center in Switzerland were assessed. Postoperative outcomes and hospital costs of octogenarians and younger patients were compared in univariate and multivariate regression analysis. During the study period, 346 patients underwent pancreatic resection. Pancreatoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, total pancreatectomy, and other procedures were performed in 54%, 20%, 13%, and 13% of patients, respectively. The major postoperative morbidity rate and postoperative mortality rate were 25% and 3.5%, respectively. A total of 39 patients (11%) were ≥80 years old, and 307 patients were <80 years old. The majority of octogenarians suffered from ductal adenocarcinoma, whereas among younger patients, other indications for a pancreatic resection were predominant (ductal adenocarcinoma 64% vs. 41%, p = 0.006). Age ≥80 was associated with more frequent postoperative medical (pulmonary, cardiovascular) and surgical (high-grade pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage) complications. Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in octogenarians (15.4% vs. 2%, p < 0.0001). This finding may be explained by the higher rate of type C pancreatic fistula (13% vs. 5%), resulting more frequently in postoperative hemorrhage (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.002) among patients ≥80 years old. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, patient age ≥80 years predicted postoperative mortality independently of the tumor entity and surgical technique (p = 0.013, OR 6.71, 95% CI [1.5-30.3]). Increased major postoperative morbidity was responsible for lower cost recovery in octogenarians (94% vs. 102%, p = 0.046). In conclusion, patient age ≥80 years is associated with increased postoperative medical and surgical morbidity after major pancreatic surgery leading to lower cost recovery and a lower chance for successful resuscitation in patients requiring revisional surgery for postoperative hemorrhage and/or pancreatic fistula. In octogenarian patients suffering from pancreatic tumors, careful selection, and thorough prehabilitation is crucial to achieve the best postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes