15 research outputs found
Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with intermediate suspicion of choledocholithiasis and absence of findings in magnetic resonance cholangiography Precisión diagnóstica e impacto terapéutico de la ultrasonografía endoscópica en los pacientes con sospecha intermedia de coledocolitiasis y colangiorresonancia normal
Background: endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) are the elective tests in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. MRC is best accepted by patients, but its sensitivity might decrease in the evaluation of microlithiasis. Aim: to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of EUS in a prospective cohort of patients with intermediate suspicion of choledocolithiasis and no findings in MRC (normal MRC). Material and methods: during a period of 24 months, all the patients with clinical intermediate suspicion of choledocholithiasis and normal MRC were included. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRC and EUS were compared, and so their impact in the management of these patients. Results: seventy six patients were evaluated (lithiasis in 30% of them). Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of EUS (100%, 92%) were significantly higher than MRC values (0%, 70%) (p Antecedentes: la ultrasonografía endoscópica (USE) y la colangiografía por resonancia magnética nuclear (CRM) son las técnicas de elección para el diagnóstico de litiasis en la vía biliar. Aunque la CRM es mejor aceptada por los pacientes, la sensibilidad de esta para detectar litiasis de pequeño tamaño podría ser insuficiente. Objetivo: estudiar de forma prospectiva la precisión diagnóstica y el impacto terapéutico de la USE en los pacientes con sospecha intermedia de coledocolitiasis y CRM normal. Material y métodos: se incluyeron prospectivamente durante 24 meses todos los pacientes con sospecha clínica intermedia de coledocolitiasis y CRM negativa. Se compar�� la sensibilidad, especificidad, precisión diagnóstica, valor predictivo positivo y negativo de CRM y USE, así como su impacto en el tratamiento. Resultados: se evaluaron 76 pacientes (litiasis en el 30%). La sensibilidad y precisión diagnóstica de USE (100%, 92%) eran significativamente superiores a las alcanzadas por la CRM (0%, 70%) (p < 0,05). Los hallazgos de la USE (sospecha de coledocolitiasis) propiciaron un cambio significativo en la actitud terapéutica (realización de CPRE terapéutica) en el 38% de los pacientes (CRM había descartado coledocolitiasis y contraindicado la CPRE) (p < 0,05). Conclusiones: en pacientes con sospecha intermedia de coledocolitiasis y CRM normal, la USE permite diagnosticar litiasis en aproximadamente una tercera parte de ellos. Los hallazgos endosonográficos permiten modificar significativamente la actitud terapéutica en estos pacientes, lo que apoya su utilización en la práctica clínica diaria
Gastric polyps: analysis of endoscopic and histological features in our center Pólipos gástricos: análisis de características endoscópicas e histológicas en nuestro medio
Background and objective: the prevalence of gastric polyps in esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) ranges between 0.33 and 6.35%. The relative frequency of histological subspecies varies widely among published series. The objective is to describe the endoscopic and histological characteristics of the polypoid lesions, and to study possible associations. Material and methods: we retrospectively revised the EGDs done in our center in 2009. Demographic, endoscopic and histological data were gathered. We proceeded to a descriptive analysis and studied possible associations. Results: gastric polypoid lesions were found in 269 of the 6,307 (4.2%) reviewed EGDs, 61% were found in women. Mean age was 64.93 years (SD: ±15.23). A single polyp was found in 186 patients (69.1%), over 10 lesions appeared in 31 (11.5%). An estimated size of ≤ 3 mm was found in 108 lesions (37.2%) and greater than 10 mm in 52 cases (17.9%). Most lesions were sessile (90.8%). The location of 34.8% was the gastric antrum, 39.3% were found in the gastric body and 25.9% were in the fundus. Chronic gastritis was confirmed in 53.5% of the patients and 46.5% had received PPIs. Histopathological diagnosis was: hyperplastic polyps 50.9%, fundic gland polyps 7.4%, adenomas 3%, adenocarcinomas 1.9% and normal mucosa 29.7%. We found no significant association between the histopathological type of lesions and the use of proton pump inhibitor. Conclusions: we found polypoid lesions in 4.2% of the EGDs. The most frequent histopathological findings were hyperplastic polyps (50.9%), followed by fundic gland polyps (7.4%), adenomas (3%), and adenocarcinomas (1.9%).<br>Antecedentes y objetivo: la prevalencia de pólipos gástricos en la endoscopia digestiva alta (EDA) oscila entre el 0,33 y el 6,35%. La frecuencia de los subtipos histológicos varía ampliamente entre las series publicadas. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es describir las características endoscópicas e histológicas de los pólipos hallados en las EDA y valorar posibles asociaciones. Material y métodos: revisamos retrospectivamente las EDA realizadas en nuestro centro en 2009. Se recogieron variables demográficas, endoscópicas e histológicas. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo y se estudiaron posibles asociaciones. Resultados: se analizaron 6.307 EDA identificándose lesiones polipoideas en 269 (4,2%), el 61% en mujeres. La edad media fue de 64,93 años (DE: ±15.23). En 186 pacientes (69,1%) se objetivó un solo pólipo y en 31 (11,5%), más de 10. Se estimó un tamaño ≤ 3 mm en 108 lesiones (37,2%), y mayor de 10 mm en 52 casos (17,9%). La mayoría de los pólipos eran sésiles (90,8%). El 34,8% se ubicaban en antro, el 39,3% en cuerpo y el 25,9% en fundus. El 53,5% de los pacientes presentaba gastritis crónica y el 46,5% había recibido inhibidores de la bomba de protones (IBP). Los hallazgos histológicos principales fueron: pólipos hiperplásicos 50,9%, pólipos de glándulas fúndicas 7,4%, adenomatosos 3% y adenocarcinomas 1,9%. En el 29,7% la biopsia mostró una mucosa normal. No se objetivó asociación entre el tipo histológico y el consumo de IBP. Conclusiones: encontramos lesiones polipoideas en el 4,2% de las EDA. La histología relevante más frecuente fueron pólipos hiperplásicos (50,9%), de glándulas fúndicas (7,4%), adenomas (3%) y adenocarcinomas (1,9%)
Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses
Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10/2004 to 12/2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 (85%) patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient (1/62 = 1.6%) had a benign lung mass (hamartoma), while the remaining 61 patients (61/62 = 98.4%) had a malignant mass (primary lung cancer: 55/61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6/61 = 10%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax (1/62 = 1.6%). Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses
What Is the Value of the Learning Curve in Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation of the Major Papilla?
Introduction. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) is an alternative for the treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Existing evidence of factors associated with its outcomes is contradictory. Objective. To identify predictors (including the experience of an endoscopist) of success and adverse events in EPLBD. Methods. We reviewed the first 200 EPLBD with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) performed at our center. Demographic, clinical, and anatomic variables were studied, as well as the performance characteristics, correlating them with individual and group experience. Results. Global success was obtained in 87% of cases, and adverse events occurred in 16% of cases. Success was associated with stone size, CBD diameter, and the need to perform mechanical lithotripsy (ML). Despite that adverse events were not univariately associated with any factor, severe adverse events were more likely to occur in stones > 13.5 mm. Multivariate analysis which disclosed success was higher when ML was not required and stones were < 13.5 mm. It also showed that no factor was associated with adverse events or their severity. No differences were found on success or adverse events that could be directly related to experience. Conclusions. Success of EPLBD-EST is higher in stones < 13.5 mm and when ML is not required. Experience does not appear to play a major role