The influence of system delay on 30-day and on long-term mortality in patients with anterior versus non-anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a cohort study

Contains fulltext : 154209.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)AIM: To evaluate the relationship between system delay and 30-day and long-term mortality in patients with anterior versus non-anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study. Patients with STEMI who were transported to the Isala Hospital, Zwolle, and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) from 2005 until 2010 were included. These patients were divided into quartiles of system delay (time from first medical contact until reperfusion therapy): Q1-Q4. RESULTS: In total, 3041 patients were included in our study. 41% (n=1253) of the patients had an anterior myocardial infarction (MI) and 59% of the patients (n=1788) had a non-anterior MI. Only in patients with an anterior MI, prolonged system delay was associated with a higher mortality (30-day Q1: 2.6%, Q2: 3.1%, Q3: 6.8%, Q4: 7.4%, p=0.001; long-term Q1: 12.8%, Q2: 13.7%, Q3: 24.1%, Q4: 22.6%, p<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, prolonged system delay was associated with a higher 30-day and long-term mortality in patients with an anterior MI (30 day Q2: HR 1.18, 95% CI (0.46 to 3.00), Q3: HR 2.45, 95% CI (1.07 to 5.63), Q4: HR 2.25, 95% CI (0.97 to 5.25)); long-term Q2: HR 1.09, 95% CI (0.71 to 1.68), Q3: HR 1.68, 95% CI (1.13 to 2.49), Q4: HR 1.55, 95% CI (1.03 to 2.33)), but not in patients with a non-anterior MI. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged system delay significantly increased short-term as well as long-term mortality in patients with an anterior MI. This effect was not demonstrated in patients with a non-anterior MI. Therefore, it is of the greatest importance to minimise system delay in patients who present with an anterior MI

Age-dependent differences in diabetes and acute hyperglycemia between men and women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a cohort study

Contains fulltext : 119180.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Both acute hyperglycemia as diabetes results in an impaired prognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. It is unknown whether there is a different prevalence of diabetes and acute hyperglycemia in men and women within age-groups. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2010, 4640 consecutive patients (28% women) with STEMI, were referred for primary PCI. Patients were stratified into two age groups, /=65 years (2193 patients). Separate analyses were performed in 3901 patients without diabetes. Diabetes was defined as known diabetes or HbA1c >/=6.5 mmol/l at admission. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes was comparable between women and men in the younger age group (14% vs 12%, p = 0.52), whereas in the older age group diabetes was more prevalent in women (25% vs 17% p < 0.001). In patients without diabetes, admission glucose was comparable between both genders in younger patients (8.1 +/- 2.0 mmol/l vs 8.0 +/- 2.2 mmol/l p = 0.36), but in older patients admission glucose was higher in women than in men (8.7 +/- 2.1 mmol/l vs 8.4 +/- 2.1 mmol/l p = 0.028). After multivariable analyses, the occurrence of increased admission glucose was comparable between men and women in the younger age group (OR 1.1, 95%CI 0.9-1.5), but increased in women in the older age group (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.7). Both diabetes and hyperglycemia were associated with a higher one-year mortality in both men and women. CONCLUSIONS: The differences between men and women in hyperglycemia and diabetes in patients with STEMI are age dependent and can only be observed in older patients. This may have implications for medical treatment and should be investigated further

The influence of residential distance on time to treatment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

Contains fulltext : 136116.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)AIMS: To evaluate the relation between residential distance and total ischaemic time in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: STEMI patients were transported to the Isala Hospital Zwolle with the intention to perform primary percutaneous coronary intervention PCI (pPCI) from 2004 until 2010 (n = 4149). Of these, 1424 patients (34 %) were referred via a non-PCI 'spoke' centre ('spoke' patients) and 2725 patients (66 %) were referred via field triage in the ambulance (ambulance patients). RESULTS: A longer residential distance increased median total ischaemic time in 'spoke' patients (0-30 km: 228 min, >30-60 km: 235 min, >60-90 km: 264 min, p 30-60 km: 175 min, >60-90 km: 186 min, p = 0.225). After multivariable linear regression analysis, in 'spoke' patients residential distance of >30-60 km compared with 0-30 km was not independently associated with ischaemic time; however, a residential distance of >60-90 km (exp (B) = 1.11, 95 % CI 1.01-1.12) compared with 0-30 km was independently related with ischaemic time. In ambulance patients, residential distance of >30-60 and >60-90 km compared with 0-30 km was not independently associated with ischaemic time. CONCLUSION: A longer distance from the patient's residence to a PCI centre was associated with a small but significant increase in time to treatment in 'spoke' patients, however not in ambulance patients. Therefore, referral via field triage in the ambulance did not lead to a significant increase in time to treatment, especially at long distances (up to 90 km)

Cardiogenic Shock Predicts Long-term Mortality in Hospital Survivors of STEMI Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) has a poor prognosis. Recently published data suggested, however, that CS does not affect long-term mortality in hospital survivors of STEMI. We investigated whether this could be confirmed in a larger cohort. HYPOTHESIS: STEMI complicated by CS leads to worse long-term survival. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in 7412 consecutive patients with STEMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (angioplasty). The predictive value of CS on long-term mortality was assessed in hospital survivors. Multivariate analysis, adjusting for differences in baseline variables, was performed to assess the independent prognostic value of CS. RESULTS: Cardiogenic shock was observed in 387 patients (5.2%). The total in-hospital mortality was 254 (3.4%), and mortality was significantly higher in patients with CS (20.0% vs 2.6%; P < 0.001). The 1-year mortality in hospital survivors was 10.3% in patients with CS and 3.9% in patients without CS (P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, CS was still a significant predictor of long-term mortality in hospital survivors (hazard ratio: 2.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.64-4.01). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiogenic shock remains a strong predictor of long-term mortality in hospital survivors of STEMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Closure device or manual compression in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized comparison.

Item does not contain fulltextAIMS: Although closure devices may be comfortable for patients, the clinical benefits in patients with moderate-to-high risk of bleeding are not yet clear. We compared a closure device with manual compression in moderate- to high-risk bleeding patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized study was performed to compare a closure device (Angio-Seal, St. Jude Medical, Inc.) with manual compression in 627 patients treated with aspirin, clopidogrel, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor and heparin during PCI. The primary endpoint was the inhospital combined incidence of: 1) severe hematoma > 5 cm at the puncture site or groin bleeding resulting in prolonged hospital stay, transfusion and/or surgical intervention at the puncture site; 2) arteriovenous fistula formation and/or surgical intervention at the puncture site. A total of 313 patients (49.9%) were randomized to the closure device and 314 patients (50.1%) to manual compression. The combined primary endpoint was 2.6% in the closure device group compared to 4.5% in the manual compression group (p = 0.195). In the predefined subgroup of patients with a history of hypertension, however, the combined primary endpoint (0.8% vs. 7.2%; p = 0.008) was significantly reduced after use of the closure device. CONCLUSION: This trial did not show the superiority of using a closure device over manual compression in patients treated with triple antiplatelet therapy who underwent PCI. The fact that patients with a history of hypertension had a benefit from a closure device merits further investigation.1 december 201

Non-culprit lesions detected during primary PCI: treat invasively or follow the guidelines?

Item does not contain fulltextAIMS: Evidence regarding the optimal treatment of non-culprit lesions detected during primary PCI is lacking. Our aim was to investigate whether early invasive treatment improves left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and prevents major adverse cardiac events (MACE). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 121 patients with at least one non-culprit lesion, 80 were randomised to early FFRguided PCI (invasive group), and 41 to medical treatment (conservative group). Primary endpoint was EF at six months, secondary endpoints included MACE. In the invasive group, early angiography was performed 7.5 days (5-20) after primary PCI. Forty percent of the non-culprit lesions did not show haemodynamic significance (FFR > 0.75). Subsequent PCI of at least one non-culprit lesion was performed in 52%, PCI without preceding FFR was performed in 8% and elective CABG was done in 4%. No in-hospital events occurred in the conservative group. After six months, EF was comparable (59+/-9% vs. 57+/-9%, p=0.362), and there was no difference in MACE between invasively and conservatively treated patients (21 vs. 22%, p=0.929). CONCLUSIONS: An invasive strategy towards non-culprit lesions does not lead to an increase in EF or a reduction in MACE. The functional stenosis severity of non-culprit lesions is frequently overestimated.1 april 201

Circumflex artery related myocardial infarction: Less reperfusion therapy and large infarct size

Item does not contain fulltex

Poor outcome after recurrent acute myocardial infarction: a plea for optimal secondary prevention

Item does not contain fulltex

Old age and outcome after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of age as an independent factor determining the prognosis and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated using primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis from a dedicated database. SETTING: A high-volume interventional cardiology center in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand nine hundred thirty-three consecutive patients with AMI. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes after 30 days and 1 year were compared according to age categorized in three groups: younger than 65, 65 to 74, and 75 and older. A more-detailed analysis was performed with six age groups, from younger than 40 to 80 and older. RESULTS: Of the 4,933 consecutive patients with AMI treated with PCI between 1992 and 2004, 643 were aged 75 and older. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients aged 65 to 75 had a greater risk of 1-year mortality than those younger than 65 (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.15-2.16) and that those aged 75 and older had a greater risk of 1-year mortality than those younger than 65 (AOR=3.03, 95% CI=2.14-4.29). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, older age was independently associated with greater mortality after PCI for AMI. Patients aged 65 and older had a higher risk of mortality than younger patients, and those aged 75 and older had the highest risk of mortality.1 mei 201

Predictors and importance of prolonged hospital stay after primary PCI for ST elevation myocardial infarction

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: Although most patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have a good prognosis and can be discharged from hospital very soon, some patients must be admitted longer. We performed the current analysis to assess predictors and the prognostic significance of prolonged hospital stay. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, individual data from 2323 patients who survived at least 2 days after primary PCI in our hospital were recorded. Patients in the highest tertile of hospital stay were compared with the other patients. Both predictors and prognostic importance of prolonged hospital stay were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean admission duration was 6.7 days (standard deviation=6.6). A total of 797 patients had a hospital stay for more than 6 days (highest tertile). Patients with a longer hospital stay were older, more often female, had more often a history of previous myocardial infarction and signs of heart failure on admission, and had more frequently Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 before PCI. In addition, a low left ventricular ejection fraction was independently associated with prolonged hospital stay [odds ratio: 2.06 (95% confidence interval: 1.54-2.76)], but with a comparable risk of 1-year mortality [odds ratio: 1.3 (95% confidence interval: 0.8-2.0)]. CONSLUSION: According to this study, a low left ventricular ejection fraction is associated with prolonged hospital stay in patients after primary PCI. Predictors of prolonged hospital stay are age, female sex, previous myocardial infarction, heart failure on admission, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 before PCI