Priority Setting and Influential Factors on Acceptance of Pharmaceutical Recommendations in Collaborative Medication Reviews in an Ambulatory Care Setting - Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (WestGem-Study)

Background Medication reviews are recognized services to increase quality of therapy and reduce medication risks. The selection of eligible patients with potential to receive a major benefit is based on assumptions rather than on factual data. Acceptance of interprofessional collaboration is crucial to increase the quality of medication therapy. Objective The research question was to identify and prioritize eligible patients for a medication review and to provide evidence-based criteria for patient selection. Acceptance of the prescribing general practitioner to implement pharmaceutical recommendations was measured and factors influencing physicians' acceptance were explored to obtain an impression on the extent of collaboration in medication review in an ambulatory care setting. Methods Based on data of a cluster-randomized controlled study (WestGem-study), the correlation between patient parameters and the individual performance in a medication review was calculated in a multiple logistic regression model. Physician's acceptance of the suggested intervention was assessed using feedback forms. Influential factors were analyzed. Results The number of drugs in use (p = 0.001), discrepancies between prescribed and used medicines (p = 0.014), the baseline Medication Appropriateness Index score (p0.05) and a low kidney function (p>0.05) do not predetermine the outcome. Longitudinal patient care with repeated reviews showed higher interprofessional acceptance and superior patient benefit. A total of 54.9% of the recommendations in a medication review on drug therapy were accepted for implementation. Conclusions The number of drugs in use and medication reconciliation could be a first rational step in patient selection for a medication review. Most elderly, multimorbid patients with polymedication experience a similar chance of receiving a benefit from a medication review. Longitudinal patient care should be preferred over confined medication reviews. The acceptance of medication reviews by physicians supports further implementation into health care systems

CONSORT flow diagram of the WestGem-study.

<p>CONSORT flow diagram of the WestGem-study.</p

Baseline characteristics of the studied patient group (N = 129).

<p>Data is presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.</p

Patient characteristics for the ITT group and for eligible patients of the acceptance analysis.

<p>Data is presented as mean (SD) unless otherwise indicated.</p

Results of the multiple logistic regressions after automatic selection, approach 1, early detectable parameters and approach 2, later detectable parameters.

<p>Results of the multiple logistic regressions after automatic selection, approach 1, early detectable parameters and approach 2, later detectable parameters.</p

The 10 Items of the Medication Appropriateness Index [36] and its weighting [37].

<p>The 10 Items of the Medication Appropriateness Index [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0156304#pone.0156304.ref036" target="_blank">36</a>] and its weighting [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0156304#pone.0156304.ref037" target="_blank">37</a>].</p