9 research outputs found

    Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

    Get PDF
    Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

    Infusion rate and pharmacokinetics of intravenous pamidronate in the treatment of tumour-induced hypercalcaemia.

    No full text
    We report the results of two consecutive randomized studies in the treatment of malignant hypercalcaemia with intravenous pamidronate. Overall normocalcaemia was achieved in greater than 90% of patients and a single infusion of 60 mg pamidronate given over 2 hours was as effective in restoring normocalcaemia as infusions given over 4, 8 or 24 hours. Similarly duration of normocalcemia after treatment with pamidronate and the control of the symptoms of hypercalcaemia were independent of infusion rate. Study of the pharmacokinetics of pamidronate in the treatment of hypercalcaemia show this drug to have a very high clearance due to calcified tissue retention and renal excretion. The initial half life of the drug in plasma is very short and most of the drug is cleared before distribution equilibrium is achieved. Short infusions of pamidronate are as safe and effective as infusions given over a longer time and are therefore to be preferred because of their greater convenience
    corecore