Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment

Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is the most common congenital viral infection and is the leading non-genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNLH) and an important cause of neurodevelopmental disabilities. The risk of intrauterine transmission is highest when primary infection occurs during pregnancy, with a higher rate of vertical transmission in mothers with older gestational age at infection, while the risk of adverse fetal effects significantly increases if fetal infection occurs during the first half of pregnancy. Despite its prevalence and morbidity among the neonatal population, there is not yet a standardized diagnostic test and therapeutic approach for cCMV infection. This narrative review aims to explore the latest developments in the diagnosis and treatment of cCMV infection. Literature analysis shows that preventive interventions other than behavioral measures during pregnancy are still lacking, although many clinical trials are currently ongoing to formulate a vaccination for women before pregnancy. Currently, we recommend using a PCR assay in blood, urine, and saliva in neonates with suspected cCMV infection. At present, there is no evidence of the benefit of antiviral therapy in asymptomatic infants. In the case of symptomatic cCMV, we actually recommend treatment with oral valganciclovir for a duration of 12 months. The effectiveness and tolerability of this therapy option have proven effective for hearing and neurodevelopmental long-term outcomes. Valganciclovir is reserved for congenitally-infected neonates with the symptomatic disease at birth, such as microcephaly, intracranial calcifications, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid index, chorioretinitis, or sensorineural hearing loss. Treatment with antiviral drugs is not routinely recommended for neonates with the mildly symptomatic disease at birth, for neonates under 32 weeks of gestational age, or for infants more than 30 days old because of insufficient evidence from studies. However, since these populations represent the vast majority of neonates and infants with cCMV infection and they are at risk of developing late-onset sequelae, a biomarker able to predict long-term sequelae should also be found to justify starting treatment and reducing the burden of CMV-related complications

No difference in intestinal strontium absorption after oral or IV calcitriol in children with secondary hyperparathyroidism

No difference in intestinal strontium absorption after oral or IV calcitriol in children with secondary hyperparathyroidism.BackgroundOral and intravenous calcitriol bolus therapy are both recommended for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism, but it has been claimed that the latter is less likely to induce absorptive hypercalcemia. The present study was undertaken to verify whether intravenous calcitriol actually stimulates intestinal calcium absorption less than oral calcitriol and whether it is superior in suppressing parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion.MethodsTwenty children (16 males, age range of 5.1 to 16.9 years, mean creatinine clearance 21.9 ± 11.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, range of 7.4 to 52.7) with chronic renal failure (CRF) and secondary hyperparathyroidism [median intact PTH (iPTH), 327 pg/mL; range 143 to 1323] received two single calcitriol boli (1.5 mg/m2 body surface area) orally and intravenously using a randomized crossover design. iPTH and 1,25(OH)2D3 levels were measured over 72 hours, and intestinal calcium absorption was measured 24 hours after the calcitriol bolus using stable strontium (Sr) as a surrogate marker. Baseline control values for Sr absorption were obtained in a separate group of children with CRF of similar severity.ResultsThe peak serum level of 1,25(OH)2D3 and area under the curve baseline to 72 hours (AUC0–72h) were significantly higher after intravenous (IV) calcitriol (AUC0–72h oral, 1399 ± 979 pg/mL · hour vs. IV 2793 ± 1102 pg/mL · hour, P < 0.01), but the mean intestinal Sr absorption was not different [SrAUC0–240min during the 4 hours after Sr administration 2867 ± 1101 FAD% (fraction of the absorbed dose) vs. 3117 ± 1581 FAD% with oral and IV calcitriol, respectively]. The calcitriol-stimulated Sr absorption was more then 30% higher compared with control values (2165 ± 176 FAD%). A significant decrease in plasma iPTH was noted 12 hours after the administration of the calcitriol bolus, which was maintained for up to 72 hours without any differences regarding the two routes of administration.ConclusionsThese results demonstrate that under acute conditions, intravenous and oral calcitriol boli equally stimulate calcium absorption and had a similar efficacy in suppressing PTH secretion

Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 mRNA-Based Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in People with Cystic Fibrosis According to Disease Characteristics and Maintenance Therapies

During the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign, people with CF (pwCF) were considered a clinically vulnerable population. However, data on the immunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwCF are lacking. We conducted a prospective study enrolling all patients aged &gt; 12 and who were followed-up in our CF center and received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine in the period of March&ndash;October 2021. Blood samples were taken from them for the quantification of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain immediately before receiving the first dose and 3 and 6 months after the second dose. We enrolled 143 patients (median age: 21 years, range: 13&ndash;38), 16 of whom had had a previous infection. Geometric mean antibody titer (GMT) 3 months after vaccination was 1355 U/mL (95% CI: 1165&ndash;1575) and decreased to 954 U/mL (95% CI: 819&ndash;1111) after 6 months (p &lt; 0.0001). GMT was higher among previously infected patients as compared to those na&iuml;ve to SARS-CoV-2 (6707 vs. 1119 U/mL at 3 months and 4299 vs. 796 U/mL at 6 months, p &lt; 0.0001) with no significant differences in the rate of decline over time (p = 0.135). All pwCF mounted an antibody response after two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, which waned at 6 months from vaccination. Age &ge; 30 years and the use of inhaled corticosteroids were associated with a lower humoral response. Between the second and the third doses, nine episodes of vaccine breakthrough infections were observed

Impact of COVID-19 on Lung Disease in People with Cystic Fibrosis: A 6-Month Follow-Up Study on Respiratory Outcomes

Background: The impact of COVID-19 on respiratory outcomes in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) has not been clearly characterized. We evaluated changes in respiratory function indicators derived from spirometry and pulmonary exacerbation rates 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This multicentre prospective study was based on pwCF enrolled between October, 2020 and June, 2021 in the DECO COVID-19 project. PwCF complaining of COVID-like symptoms were tested with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab. Mean changes in respiratory function indicators and time to first episode of pulmonary exacerbation were compared between RT-PCR-positive and RT-PCR-negative patients. Regression models were used to adjust for baseline percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1) values, number of comorbidities, and initiation of CFTR modulator therapy during the follow-up. Results: We enrolled 26 pwCF with RT-PCR-confirmed infection and 42 with a RT-PCR-negative test. After 6 months of follow-up, mean ppFEV1 changes were not significantly different between groups (+0.3% in positive vs. +0.2% in negative patients, p = 0.19). The 6-month cumulative probabilities of a first episode of pulmonary exacerbation were: 0.575 among RT-PCR-negative patients and 0.538 among those with a positive test (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.44–1.75). Conclusions: COVID-19 did not appear to negatively affect respiratory outcomes of pwCF at 6 months from infection

Multiple, random spot urine sampling for estimating urinary sodium excretion

The measurement of sodium intake may be important for the management of hypertension. Dietary surveys and 24-h urinary collection are often unreliable and/or impractical. We hypothesized that urinary sodium excretion can be accurately estimated through multiple spot urine samples from different days. All enrolled subjects were children of the coauthors of the study. Fifty-two 24-h urinary collections (4 per subject) for measuring sodium excretion and the 297 related urinary samples (1 per voiding) were collected for calculating the urinary sodium/urinary creatinine ratio in 13 children. The mean of 4 measured sodium excretions served as the individual "gold standard". Twenty-four urinary collections were used to generate the equation predicting the mean measured sodium excretion from the mean of 4 urinary sodium/urinary creatinine [= 0.016 × urinary sodium (mmol/L) / urinary creatinine (mmol/L) ratio + 3.3)]; the remaining 28 urinary collections and 153 urinary samples were used for the external validation. All subjects underwent an additional validation procedure involving 12 urinary samples randomly collected on different days 6&nbsp;months apart. The performance of sodium excretion calculated from a total of over 22,000 possible means of 4 out of all the available urinary samples, randomly taken on different days, was analyzed as to precision (by means of the coefficient of variation) and as to accuracy (by means of the P30). The coefficients of variations of measured vs. calculated sodium excretion were 25.3% vs. 25.8%, and the P30 of calculated sodium excretion was 100%. The excellent performance of calculated sodium excretion was confirmed both by external validation and by samples collected 6&nbsp;months apart with mean P30s, all between 86 and 100%.Conclusion: In the described experimental conditions, urinary sodium excretion was estimated with equal precision and more accurately (and practically) by the mean of 4 urinary sodium/urinary creatinine ratios from random samples from different days than by a single urinary collection. In real life, with several errors systematically affecting urinary collection, the superiority of calculated sodium excretion is likely to be even greater. What is Known: • The measurement of sodium intake with the current standards of care (dietary survey or 24-h urinary collection) is laborious and can be inaccurate. What is New: • The study provides evidence that sodium intake can be estimated equally precisely, more accurately and more practically with the urinary sodium-to-urinary creatinine ratio from 4 urine samples taken on different days than with a single urinary collection