113 research outputs found

    De la coopération intellectuelle à la diplomatie culturelle : le parcours du Brésil dans l'entre-deux-guerres

    Get PDF
    À partir des annĂ©es 1930, le BrĂ©sil construit les outils d'une diplomatie culturelle, cherchant ainsi Ă  prĂ©senter au monde une image qui lui soit favorable. Ce processus s'enracine dans des pratiques de coopĂ©ration intellectuelle qui se dĂ©veloppent en AmĂ©rique latine Ă  partir de la fin du XIXe siĂšcle, puis grĂące Ă  des acteurs et des rĂ©seaux qui Ă©mergent au lendemain de la PremiĂšre Guerre mondiale, dans un cadre international, Ă  travers l'Institut International de CoopĂ©ration intellectuelle, dĂ©pendant de la SdN, et panamĂ©ricain. C'est donc sur une partition qui se joue autant en Europe qu'en AmĂ©rique, dans une dynamique mĂȘlant les Ă©chelles nationale, transnationale et internationale, qu'un certain nombre d'acteurs brĂ©siliens composent l'identitĂ© internationale de leur pays.A partir da dĂ©cada de 1930, o Brasil começa a elaborar uma diplomacia cultural, com o objetivo de construir uma imagem positiva no cenĂĄrio internacional. As raĂ­zes desse processo se encontram nas prĂĄticas de cooperação intelectual que se desenvolvem na AmĂ©rica Latina no final do sĂ©culo XIX e, depois da Primeira Guerra mundial, a partir das redes e dos atores num quadro tanto internacional - atravĂ©s do Instituto Internacional de Cooperação Intelectual que dependia da Liga das NaçÔes - quanto panamericano. Foi portanto entre a AmĂ©rica e a Europa, em escalas nacionais, transnacionais e internacionais, que alguns brasileiros compuseram a partitura da identidade internacional do paĂ­s

    A case-only study to identify genetic modifiers of breast cancer risk for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers

    Get PDF
    Abstract: Breast cancer (BC) risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers varies by genetic and familial factors. About 50 common variants have been shown to modify BC risk for mutation carriers. All but three, were identified in general population studies. Other mutation carrier-specific susceptibility variants may exist but studies of mutation carriers have so far been underpowered. We conduct a novel case-only genome-wide association study comparing genotype frequencies between 60,212 general population BC cases and 13,007 cases with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. We identify robust novel associations for 2 variants with BC for BRCA1 and 3 for BRCA2 mutation carriers, P < 10−8, at 5 loci, which are not associated with risk in the general population. They include rs60882887 at 11p11.2 where MADD, SP11 and EIF1, genes previously implicated in BC biology, are predicted as potential targets. These findings will contribute towards customising BC polygenic risk scores for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

    A case-only study to identify genetic modifiers of breast cancer risk for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers

    Get PDF
    Breast cancer (BC) risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers varies by genetic and familial factors. About 50 common variants have been shown to modify BC risk for mutation carriers. All but three, were identified in general population studies. Other mutation carrier-specific susceptibility variants may exist but studies of mutation carriers have so far been underpowered. We conduct a novel case-only genome-wide association study comparing genotype frequencies between 60,212 general population BC cases and 13,007 cases with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. We identify robust novel associations for 2 variants with BC for BRCA1 and 3 for BRCA2 mutation carriers, P < 10−8, at 5 loci, which are not associated with risk in the general population. They include rs60882887 at 11p11.2 where MADD, SP11 and EIF1, genes previously implicated in BC biology, are predicted as potential targets. These findings will contribute towards customising BC polygenic risk scores for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

    Pan-American Intellectual Cooperation: Emergence, Institutionalization, and Fields of Action

    No full text
    International audienceHow can a chapter about intellectual cooperation in the first half of the XXth century participate in the historiographical renewal around Pan-Americanism and shed new light on its significance?First, because it is quite an unknown dimension of Pan-Americanism, which has been studied for a long time in its political and economic dimensions. Recently, some scholars have addressed this question; even if it were punctually, their analyses reveal the diversity and complexity of Pan-American intellectual cooperation.Besides, the second reason why it is interesting to study intellectual cooperation is that it challenges the long-lasting approach of Pan-Americanism, inherited from the Cold War period, presenting it as a tool for the USA’s push for regional hegemony. In the light of intellectual cooperation, it is obvious that Latin America was everything but passive in the Pan-American dynamic; moreover, the networks, practices and ideas launched by the Pan-American Union in the field of intellectual cooperation contributed to the affirmation of national and regional identities.We will therefore argue in this chapter that if the different aspects of Pan-American intellectual cooperation can be analyzed in the frame of the “informal empire”, such as Ricardo Salvatore defined it, they also reveal that both North-Americans and Latin-Americans took up Pan-Americanism as a way to defend their own interests. Thus, it is possible to highlight not only dynamics between the US and Latin America, but also between Latin-American nations.In order to do so, we will first trace back the emergence and institutionalization of Pan-American intellectual cooperation; then, we will provide an overview of its fields of action, education being the most important; that’s why we’ll finally focus on this topic

    Pan-American Intellectual Cooperation: Emergence, Institutionalization, and Fields of Action

    No full text
    International audienceHow can a chapter about intellectual cooperation in the first half of the XXth century participate in the historiographical renewal around Pan-Americanism and shed new light on its significance?First, because it is quite an unknown dimension of Pan-Americanism, which has been studied for a long time in its political and economic dimensions. Recently, some scholars have addressed this question; even if it were punctually, their analyses reveal the diversity and complexity of Pan-American intellectual cooperation.Besides, the second reason why it is interesting to study intellectual cooperation is that it challenges the long-lasting approach of Pan-Americanism, inherited from the Cold War period, presenting it as a tool for the USA’s push for regional hegemony. In the light of intellectual cooperation, it is obvious that Latin America was everything but passive in the Pan-American dynamic; moreover, the networks, practices and ideas launched by the Pan-American Union in the field of intellectual cooperation contributed to the affirmation of national and regional identities.We will therefore argue in this chapter that if the different aspects of Pan-American intellectual cooperation can be analyzed in the frame of the “informal empire”, such as Ricardo Salvatore defined it, they also reveal that both North-Americans and Latin-Americans took up Pan-Americanism as a way to defend their own interests. Thus, it is possible to highlight not only dynamics between the US and Latin America, but also between Latin-American nations.In order to do so, we will first trace back the emergence and institutionalization of Pan-American intellectual cooperation; then, we will provide an overview of its fields of action, education being the most important; that’s why we’ll finally focus on this topic

    From Intellectual Cooperation to Cultural Diplomacy : the Argentinian, Brazilian and Chilean Experiences (1919-1946)

    No full text
    S’inscrivant dans le champ de l’histoire des relations culturelles internationales, cette thĂšse analyse de maniĂšre comparatiste l’élaboration d’une diplomatie culturelle par l’Argentine, le BrĂ©sil et le Chili dans la pĂ©riode de l’entre-deux-guerres, en s’appuyant sur des organismes de coopĂ©ration intellectuelle Ă  vocation internationale ou rĂ©gionale. Notre but est de montrer comment, Ă  partir des toiles tissĂ©es par les diffĂ©rentes structures et dynamiques de la coopĂ©ration intellectuelle, internationale, continentale ou latino-amĂ©ricaine, l’Argentine, le BrĂ©sil et le Chili ont forgĂ© les instruments d’une diplomatie culturelle et ont bĂąti une certaine image d’eux-mĂȘmes sur la scĂšne internationale. Cette thĂšse vise Ă  montrer que les initiatives argentine, brĂ©silienne et chilienne sur le terrain de la diplomatie culturelle ne prennent corps et sens que dans la mesure oĂč elles s’insĂšrent dans des dynamiques qui dĂ©passent leurs frontiĂšres.Dans le cadre d’une Ă©tude sur la diplomatie culturelle, qui implique que le pays qui en fait usage ait une image Ă  proposer sur la scĂšne internationale, la question de l’identitĂ© nationale est au cƓur de la rĂ©flexion. Nous nous inscrivons donc dans une perspective qui relĂšve tout autant de l’histoire des relations internationales que de l’histoire culturelle, aux confins des dĂ©bats sur l’identitĂ© nationale et sur la dĂ©finition de la politique Ă©trangĂšre.Contributing to the field of history of international cultural relations, this thesis proposes a comparative analysis of the engagement in cultural diplomacy by Argentina, Brazil and Chile in the period between the two World Wars. This surge in cultural diplomacy relied upon organizations for intellectual cooperation, both on an international and regional level. The goal of this work is to show how, from various networks embedded in the structures and dynamics of international, continental and Latin American intellectual cooperation, Argentina, Brazil and Chile forged deliberate instruments of cultural diplomacy and constructed a certain image of themselves on the international scene. This thesis aims to show that these initiatives in cultural diplomacy could neither have happened nor acquired their importance without being part of larger dynamics transcending their own national borders. At the heart of any reflection on cultural diplomacy and its concern with projections of national images into international settings is the question of national identity. Therefore, the work takes a perspective that is as much part of history of international relations as it is cultural history, retracing the frontier of debates on national identity and the definition of foreign policy

    Juan Pablo Scarfi, The Hidden History of International Law in the Americas. Empire and Legal Network, New York, Oxford University Press, 2017, 280 pages

    No full text
    Compte rendu paru le n° 141 pages 222-22
    • 

    corecore