Prostate-specific Antigen Decline After 4 Weeks of Treatment with Abiraterone Acetate and Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Background The availability of multiple new treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) mandates earlier treatment switches in the absence of a response. A decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is widely used to monitor treatment response, but is not validated as an intermediate endpoint for overall survival (OS).Objective To evaluate the association between early PSA decline and OS following abiraterone acetate (AA) treatment.Design, setting, and participants We identified mCRPC patients treated with AA before or after docetaxel at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust between 2006 and 2014. Early PSA decline was defined as a 30% decrease in PSA at 4 wk relative to baseline, and early PSA rise as a 25% increase.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Association with OS was analyzed using multivariate Cox regression and log-rank analyses. Spearman's rho correlation coefficient (r) was calculated to evaluate the association between PSA changes at 4 wk and 12 wk.Results and limitations There were 274 patients eligible for this analysis. A 30% PSA decline at 4 wk was associated with longer OS (25.8 vs 15.1 mo; hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, p<0.001), and a 25% PSA rise at 4 wk with shorter OS (15.1 vs 23.8 mo; HR 1.7, p=0.001) in both univariate and multivariable models. The percentage PSA decline at 4 wk was significantly correlated with the percentage PSA change at 12 wk (r=0.82; p<0.001). Patients achieving a 30% PSA decline at 4 wk were 11.7 times more likely to achieve a 50% PSA decrease at 12 wk (sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 79.4%). Limitations include the retrospective design of this analysis.Conclusions Patients not achieving 30% PSA decline after 4 wk of AA have a lower likelihood of achieving PSA response at 12 wk and significantly inferior OS. Prospective multicentre validation studies are needed to confirm these findings.Patient summary Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is commonly used to evaluate response to treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Expert recommendations discourage reliance on PSA changes earlier than 12 wk after treatment initiation. Our data suggest that early PSA changes are associated with survival in patients receiving abiraterone acetate

Addition of Docetaxel to First-line Long-term Hormone Therapy in Prostate Cancer (STAMPEDE): Modelling to Estimate Long-term Survival, Quality-adjusted Survival, and Cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND: Results from large randomised controlled trials have shown that adding docetaxel to the standard of care (SOC) for men initiating hormone therapy for prostate cancer (PC) prolongs survival for those with metastatic disease and prolongs failure-free survival for those without. To date there has been no formal assessment of whether funding docetaxel in this setting represents an appropriate use of UK National Health Service (NHS) resources OBJECTIVE: To assess whether administering docetaxel to men with PC starting long-term hormone therapy is cost-effective in a UK setting. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We modelled health outcomes and costs in the UK NHS using data collected within the STAMPEDE trial, which enrolled men with high-risk, locally advanced metastatic or recurrent PC starting first-line hormone therapy. INTERVENTION: SOC was hormone therapy for ≥2 yr and radiotherapy in some patients. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) was administered alongside SOC for six three-weekly cycles. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The model generated lifetime predictions of costs, changes in survival duration, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The model predicted that docetaxel would extend survival (discounted quality-adjusted survival) by 0.89 yr (0.51) for metastatic PC and 0.78 yr (0.39) for nonmetastatic PC, and would be cost-effective in metastatic PC (ICER £5514/QALY vs SOC) and nonmetastatic PC (higher QALYs, lower costs vs SOC). Docetaxel remained cost-effective in nonmetastatic PC when the assumption of no survival advantage was modelled. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel is cost-effective among patients with nonmetastatic and metastatic PC in a UK setting. Clinicians should consider whether the evidence is now sufficiently compelling to support docetaxel use in patients with nonmetastatic PC, as the opportunity to offer docetaxel at hormone therapy initiation will be missed for some patients by the time more mature survival data are available. PATIENT SUMMARY: Starting docetaxel chemotherapy alongside hormone therapy represents a good use of UK National Health Service resources for patients with prostate cancer that is high risk or has spread to other parts of the body

Addition of docetaxel to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): Long-term survival, quality-adjusted survival, and cost-effectiveness analysis

Background: Results from large randomised controlled trials have shown that adding docetaxel to standard of care (SOC) in men initiating hormone therapy for prostate cancer prolongs survival for those with metastatic disease and prolongs time to treatment failure for those without metastatic disease. We report on the impact of docetaxel on health related quality of life (HRQoL), resource use and cost-effectiveness for men treated in the STAMPEDE trial. Methods: Health outcomes and costs in the UK NHS were modelled using EuroQol (EQ-5D)and resource use data collected within the STAMPEDE trial (STAMPEDE enrolled men advanced prostate cancer starting first line hormone therapy. SOC was hormone therapy for ≥2 years and radiotherapy in some patients. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) was administered alongside SOC for six 3-weekly cycles with prednisolone 10 mg daily. Lifetime predictions of costs, changes in predicted survival duration, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Results: Compared to patients allocated SOC, docetaxel was estimated to extend predicted survival by an average of 0.89 years for M1 patients and 0.78 years for M0 patients. Docetaxel was estimated to extend discounted QALYs by 0.51 years in M1 patients and 0.39 years in M0 patients. QALY gains in M0 patients were driven by the beneficial effect of delayed and reduced relapse. Docetaxel was cost-effective both in M1 patients (ICER = £5,514/QALY vs. SOC) and M0 patients (higher QALYs, lower costs vs. SOC). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a very high probability ( > 99%) that docetaxel is cost-effective in both M0 and M1 patients. Docetaxel remained cost effective in M0 patients even when no survival advantage was assumed due to reductions and delays in relapse. Conclusions: Docetaxel improves overall HRQoL, delays time to, and reduces the need for, subsequent therapy, and is cost-effective, amongst patients with both non-metastatic and metastatic disease. Clinicians should consider whether the evidence is now sufficiently compelling to support docetaxel use in non-metastatic patients

Mia40-dependent oxidation of cysteines in domain I of Ccs1 controls its distribution between mitochondria and the cytosol

Sod1 is an important antioxidant enzyme that becomes activated by its chaperone, Ccs1. The localization of Ccs1 to mitochondria is controlled by the oxidoreductase Mia40. The formation of a disulfide bond between Cys-27 and Cys-64 in Ccs1 is critical for import and stability but not for Ccs1 activity in the maturation of Sod1