An index method to evaluate growers’ pesticide use for identifying on-farm innovations and effective alternative pest management strategies: a case study of winegrape in Madera County, California*

Winegrape is an important perennial crop in California, USA. Each year California winegrape farming consumes about 20 million kilograms of pesticides that have been a pollutant source to the fresh water systems of the state. The variation of pesticide use among winegrape growers has been significant. It has been observed that some growers have developed effective ways to reduce pesticide use, yet control pests efficiently to ensure harvest. Identification of the growers with low and high pesticide use is very helpful to extension programs that aim on reducing pesticide environmental risk. In this study, an index approach is proposed to quantitatively measure pesticide use intensity at grower level. An integrated pesticide use index is developed by taking pesticide quantity and toxicity into account. An additive formula and a multiplying formula were used to calculate the pesticide use index, i.e., PUI and PUIM. It was found that both PUI and PUIM were capable of identifying the low and high pesticide users while PUI was slightly more conservative than PUIM. All pesticides used in California winegrape farming were taken into account for calculating the indices. Madera County, one of the largest winegrape producers in California, was taken as an example to test the proposed approach. In year 2000, among the total 208 winegrape growers, 28 with PUI≤10 and 34 with 10<PUI≤20 were identified as low pesticide users who were characterized with both low quantity and low toxicity of pesticide use. Most of the growers had small-sized vineyards, i.e., one field and small planted areas. Furthermore, they had very low pesticide use intensity, used only 1–2 types of pesticides (mainly fungicides), applied few pesticides (1–3 only), and emphasized the use of low toxicity compounds. Meanwhile, 19 growers with PUI>60, identified as high pesticide users, had large-sized vineyards, i.e., more fields and large planted areas. They used all types of pesticides and many compounds, which indicated that their pest controls heavily depended on pesticides rather than on-farm management. Through the case study, the proposed approach proved to be useful for analyzing the growers’ pesticide use intensities and interpreting their pesticide use behaviors, which led to a new start point for further investigation of searching ways to reduce pesticide environmental risk

Avaliação de dois simuladores para predição da lixiviação de sulfona de aldicarbe em um Latossolo Vermelho-Amarelo Evaluation of two simulators to predict the leaching of aldoxycarb in a red-yellow latossol

Este trabalho teve por objetivo o estudo da lixiviação de sulfona de aldicarbe em um Latossolo Vermelho-Amarelo, na região de Lavras, MG, para posterior comparação com os resultados obtidos pelos simuladores CALF e PESTLA. Os resultados mostraram alta lixiviação de sulfona de aldicarbe no solo em estudo. Aos 44 dias após a aplicação do inseticida e com uma lâmina de água acumulada de 241,4 mm, a quantidade média de sulfona de aldicarbe remanescente nas colunas de solo de 45 cm de profundidade foi equivalente a 17,92% (±5,88) da dose aplicada, enquanto os simuladores CALF e PESTLA estimaram 20,52% e 37,82%, respectivamente. O simulador CALF gerou melhores estimativas da quantidade média de sulfona de aldicarbe no perfil do solo nas diferentes datas de amostragem, enquanto o simulador PESTLA gerou melhores estimativas da distribuição do inseticida ao longo do perfil do solo, nas diferentes datas de amostragem.<br>This work was carried out to study the leaching of aldoxycarb in a Red Yellow Latossol in Lavras, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, and to compare the observed results with those obtained by the simulators CALF and PESTLA. The results showed a high leaching of aldoxycarb in the soil. After 44 days of the insecticide application and with 241.4 mm of accumulated water applied in each column, the remained quantity of aldoxycarb in the soil columns (45 cm long) was 17.92% (±5.88) of the initial applied rate. However, the simulators CALF and PESTLA predicted 20.52% and 37.82%, respectively. CALF simulator gave better predictions of the overall mean residue concentrations of aldoxycarb, and PESTLA simulator gave better prediction of residues distribution