9 research outputs found

    Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1

    Get PDF
    Perhaps there is no more important issue in the care of surgical patients than the appropriate use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients with cancer. Important advances in surgical technique have an impact on early perioperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, pain management, and quality of life issues, as clearly proved with MIS. However, for oncology patients, historically, the most important clinical questions have been answered in the context of prospective randomized trials. Important considerations for MIS and cancer have been addressed, such as what are the important immunologic consequences of MIS versus open surgery and what is the role of laparoscopy in the staging of gastrointestinal cancers? This review article discusses many of the key controversies in the minimally invasive treatment of cancer using the pro–con debate format

    The EAES Clinical Practice Guidelines on Laparoscopic Resection of Colonic Cancer (2004)

    No full text

    Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label trial

    No full text

    The EAES Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Pneumoperitoneum for Laparoscopic Surgery (2002)

    No full text

    Potential impact of invasive surgical procedures on primary tumor growth and metastasis

    No full text
    corecore