A randomized clinical trial comparing fixed vs pro-re-nata dosing of Ozurdex in refractory diabetic macular oedema (OZDRY study)

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of 5-monthly fixed dosing vs pro-re-nata (PRN) Ozurdex treatment in patients with refractory diabetic macular oedema (DMO). DESIGN: Prospective, multicentre, randomized active-controlled non-inferiority clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 100 patients who attended Medical Retina Clinics for management of centre-involving refractory DMO. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized 1 : 1 to either 5-monthly fixed dosing or optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PRN regimen of Ozurdex therapy for DMO. Data were collected on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), macular thickness and morphology, diabetic retinopathy status, number of injections and adverse events from baseline for a period of 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difference between arms in change in BCVA from baseline to 12 months. The prespecified non-inferiority margin was five ETDRS letters. Key secondary outcomes included change in PROM scores, change in macular thickness, change in retinopathy and macular morphology, and safety profile. RESULTS: The mean change in BCVA was +1.48 (SD 14.8) in the fixed arm vs −0.17 (SD 13.1) in the PRN arm, with adjusted effect estimate +0.97, 90% confidence interval (−4.01, +5.95), P=0.02 (per protocol analysis). The conclusions of the ITT analysis were primarily supportive, −0.34 (−5.49, 4.81) P=0.07, but sensitive to an alternative assumption on missing data, +0.28 (−4.72, 5.27) P=0.04. CONCLUSIONS: The mean change in BCVA with 5-monthly fixed dosing of Ozurdex was non-inferior to OCT-guided PRN Ozurdex therapy for refractory DMO based on a per protocol analysis

Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: Indications for a PRN Regimen of Treatment

Purpose: To define the mean time of first recurrence of diabetic macular edema (DME) after a single injection of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-I), reducing the burden of monthly visits during a PRN regimen of treatment. Methods: Twenty phakic eyes with DME (12 eyes naïve and 8 eyes with edema persistent after previous treatments) were followed monthly after DEX-I injection until evidence of first recurrence of edema, defined as a change in visual acuity (VA) ≥5 letters and/or in foveal thickness (FT) ≥50 μm. Reaching this point, the eyes were re-treated. Monitored parameters were changes in VA, FT, intraocular pressure (IOP), and lens opacity. Results: Maximal efficacy was registered at month 1, when mean VA improved by 14 letters (19%), FT decreased by 325 μm (43.7%), and in 15 eyes (75%) edema was completely reabsorbed. The mean time of first recurrence was 5.1 months. No statistical difference was found between eyes with naïve or persistent DME. Five eyes needed topical medication for modest temporary IOP increase (21-24 mm Hg) between months 2 and 4. No increase in lens opacities was registered during follow-up. Conclusions: According to the results of this study, the first signs of DME recurrence after DEX-I injection appear at a mean time of 5 months, suggesting that an appropriate and prudent time schedule for a PRN regimen could be limited to monthly tonometry and a first complete examination not before 4 months