216 research outputs found

    Noncardiac genetic predisposition in sudden infant death syndrome.

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is the commonest cause of sudden death of an infant; however, the genetic basis remains poorly understood. We aimed to identify noncardiac genes underpinning SIDS and determine their prevalence compared with ethnically matched controls. METHODS: Using exome sequencing we assessed the yield of ultrarare nonsynonymous variants (minor allele frequency [MAF] ≤0.00005, dominant model; MAF ≤0.01, recessive model) in 278 European SIDS cases (62% male; average age =2.7 ± 2 months) versus 973 European controls across 61 noncardiac SIDS-susceptibility genes. The variants were classified according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria. Case-control, gene-collapsing analysis was performed in eight candidate biological pathways previously implicated in SIDS pathogenesis. RESULTS: Overall 43/278 SIDS cases harbored an ultrarare single-nucleotide variant compared with 114/973 controls (15.5 vs. 11.7%, p=0.10). Only 2/61 noncardiac genes were significantly overrepresented in cases compared with controls (ECE1, 3/278 [1%] vs. 1/973 [0.1%] p=0.036; SLC6A4, 2/278 [0.7%] vs. 1/973 [0.1%] p=0.049). There was no difference in yield of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants between cases and controls (1/278 [0.36%] vs. 4/973 [0.41%]; p=1.0). Gene-collapsing analysis did not identify any specific biological pathways to be significantly associated with SIDS. CONCLUSIONS: A monogenic basis for SIDS amongst the previously implicated noncardiac genes and their encoded biological pathways is negligible

    A perspective on SIDS pathogenesis. The hypotheses: plausibility and evidence

    Get PDF
    Several theories of the underlying mechanisms of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) have been proposed. These theories have born relatively narrow beach-head research programs attracting generous research funding sustained for many years at expense to the public purse. This perspective endeavors to critically examine the evidence and bases of these theories and determine their plausibility; and questions whether or not a safe and reasoned hypothesis lies at their foundation. The Opinion sets specific criteria by asking the following questions: 1. Does the hypothesis take into account the key pathological findings in SIDS? 2. Is the hypothesis congruent with the key epidemiological risk factors? 3. Does it link 1 and 2? Falling short of any one of these answers, by inference, would imply insufficient grounds for a sustainable hypothesis. Some of the hypotheses overlap, for instance, notional respiratory failure may encompass apnea, prone sleep position, and asphyxia which may be seen to be linked to co-sleeping. For the purposes of this paper, each element will be assessed on the above criteria

    Clinical and biological progress over 50 years in Rett syndrome

    Get PDF
    In the 50 years since Andreas Rett first described the syndrome that came to bear his name, and is now known to be caused by a mutation in the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene, a compelling blend of astute clinical observations and clinical and laboratory research has substantially enhanced our understanding of this rare disorder. Here, we document the contributions of the early pioneers in Rett syndrome (RTT) research, and describe the evolution of knowledge in terms of diagnostic criteria, clinical variation, and the interplay with other Rett-related disorders. We provide a synthesis of what is known about the neurobiology of MeCP2, considering the lessons learned from both cell and animal models, and how they might inform future clinical trials. With a focus on the core criteria, we examine the relationships between genotype and clinical severity. We review current knowledge about the many comorbidities that occur in RTT, and how genotype may modify their presentation. We also acknowledge the important drivers that are accelerating this research programme, including the roles of research infrastructure, international collaboration and advocacy groups. Finally, we highlight the major milestones since 1966, and what they mean for the day-to-day lives of individuals with RTT and their families

    Dental treatment of a child with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome

    No full text
    Background: Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome (CCHS) is a rare condition combining respiratory hypoventilation with symptoms of autonomic dysregulation. Management of patients requires both medical and dental expertise to achieve a successful outcome. The aim of this paper is to present the dental management of a child diagnosed with CCHS, without pharmacological measures and in cooperation with medical expertise. Case report: A 7-year-old girl was referred to a private dental practice with the chief complaints being pain and poor aesthetics. The child had been diagnosed with CCHS since infancy and had undergone several courses of medication. Although the patient was uncooperative, the paediatric pulmonologist advised against general anaesthesia. As a result, she was treated in the operating theater (OT) without sedatives, being monitored throughout the entire procedure. A total of eight primary teeth needed dental treatment (3 were restored, 4 were extracted and 1 was restored with a preformed metal crown). A mandibular lingual holding arch was placed, two weeks later. Follow-up: The patient was seen after 6 months and 1 year. Her oral hygiene had improved significantly and her mother reported that the child ate better, brushed her teeth on a daily basis and was careful with dietary habits. Conclusion: The collaboration between medical experts and a paediatric dentist was of crucial importance. The use of basic behaviour management techniques in conjunction with monitoring the patient’s vital signs led to a successful outcome and an improvement in the behaviour of the patient
    corecore