Endocytosis of plasma-derived factor V by megakaryocytes occurs via a clathrin-dependent, specific membrane binding event

Megakaryocytes were analyzed for their ability to endocytose factor V to define the cellular mechanisms regulating this process. In contrast to fibrinogen, factor V was endocytosed by megakaryocytes derived from CD34 + cells or megakaryocyte-like cell lines, but not by platelets. CD41 + ex vivo -derived megakaryocytes endocytosed factor V, as did subpopulations of the megakaryocyte-like cells MEG-01, and CMK. Similar observations were made for fibrinogen. Phorbol diester-induced megakaryocytic differentiation of the cell lines resulted in a substantial increase in endocytosis of both proteins as compared to untreated cells that did not merely reflect their disparate plasma concentrations. Factor IX, which does not associate with platelets or megakaryocytes, was not endocytosed by any of the cells examined. Endocytosis of factor V by megakaryocytes proceeds through a specific and independent mechanism as CHRF-288 cells endocytosed fibrinogen but not factor V, and the presence of other plasma proteins had no effect on the endocytosis of factor V by MEG-01 cells. Furthermore, as the endocytosis of factor V was also demonstrated to occur through a clathrin-dependent mechanism, these combined data demonstrate that endocytosis of factor V by megakaryocytes occurs via a specific, independent, and most probably receptor-mediated, event.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75473/1/j.1538-7836.2005.01190.x.pd

Platelet reactivity influences clot structure as assessed by fractal analysis of viscoelastic properties

<p>Despite the interwoven nature of platelet activation and the coagulation system in thrombosis, few studies relate both analysis of protein and cellular parts of coagulation in the same population. In the present study, we use matched ex vivo samples to determine the influences of standard antiplatelet therapies on platelet function and use advanced rheological analyses to assess clot formation. Healthy volunteers were recruited following fully informed consent then treated for 7 days with single antiplatelet therapy of aspirin (75 mg) or prasugrel (10 mg) or with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using aspirin (75 mg) plus prasugrel (10 mg) or aspirin (75 mg) plus ticagrelor (90 mg). Blood samples were taken at day 0 before treatment and at day 7 following treatment. We found that aspirin plus prasugrel or aspirin plus ticagrelor inhibited platelet responses to multiple agonists and reduced P-selectin expression. Significant platelet inhibition was coupled with a reduction in fractal dimension corresponding to reductions in mean relative mass both for aspirin plus prasugrel (−35 ± 16% change, p = 0.04) and for aspirin plus ticagrelor (−45 ± 14% change, p = 0.04). Aspirin alone had no effect upon measures of clot structure, whereas prasugrel reduced fractal dimension and mean relative mass. These data demonstrate that platelets are important determinants of clot structure as assessed by fractal dimension (d_<i>f</i>) and that effective platelet inhibition is associated with a weaker, more permeable fibrin network. This indicates a strong association between the therapeutic benefits of antiplatelet therapies and their abilities to reduce thrombus density that may be useful in individual patients to determine the functional relationship between platelet reactivity, eventual clot quality, and clinical outcome. d_<i>f</i> could represent a novel risk stratification biomarker useful in individualizing antiplatelet therapies.</p