143 research outputs found

    Unveiling Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters with INTEGRAL

    Get PDF
    Thanks to INTEGRAL's long exposures of the Galactic Plane, the two brightest Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters, SGR 1806-20 and SGR 1900+14, have been monitored and studied in detail for the first time at hard-X/soft gamma rays. This has produced a wealth of new scientific results, which we will review here. Since SGR 1806-20 was particularly active during the last two years, more than 300 short bursts have been observed with INTEGRAL. and their characteristics have been studied with unprecedented sensitivity in the 15-200 keV range. A hardness-intensity anticorrelation within the bursts has been discovered and the overall Number-Intensity distribution of the bursts has been determined. In addition, a particularly active state, during which ~100 bursts were emitted in ~10 minutes, has been observed on October 5 2004, indicating that the source activity was rapidly increasing. This eventually led to the Giant Flare of December 27th 2004, for which a possible soft gamma-ray (>80 keV) early afterglow has been detected. The deep observations allowed us to discover the persistent emission in hard X-rays (20-150 keV) from 1806-20 and 1900+14, the latter being in a quiescent state, and to directly compare the spectral characteristics of all Magnetars (two SGRs and three Anomalous X-ray Pulsars) detected with INTEGRAL.Comment: 8 pages, 7 figures, Presented at the conference "Isolated Neutron Stars: from the Surface to the Interior", London, UK, 24-28 April 200

    Measurement of the branching fraction for Ī„(1S)ā†’Ļ„+Ļ„āˆ’\Upsilon (1S) \to \tau^+ \tau^-

    Full text link
    We have studied the leptonic decay of the Ī„(1S)\Upsilon (1S) resonance into tau pairs using the CLEO II detector. A clean sample of tau pair events is identified via events containing two charged particles where exactly one of the particles is an identified electron. We find B(Ī„(1S)ā†’Ļ„+Ļ„āˆ’)=(2.61Ā Ā±Ā 0.12Ā +0.09āˆ’0.13)B(\Upsilon(1S) \to \tau^+ \tau^-) = (2.61~\pm~0.12~{+0.09\atop{-0.13}})%. The result is consistent with expectations from lepton universality.Comment: 9 pages, RevTeX, two Postscript figures available upon request, CLNS 94/1297, CLEO 94-20 (submitted to Physics Letters B

    Production and Decay of D_1(2420)^0 and D_2^*(2460)^0

    Get PDF
    We have investigated D+Ļ€āˆ’D^{+}\pi^{-} and Dāˆ—+Ļ€āˆ’D^{*+}\pi^{-} final states and observed the two established L=1L=1 charmed mesons, the D1(2420)0D_1(2420)^0 with mass 2421āˆ’2āˆ’2+1+22421^{+1+2}_{-2-2} MeV/c2^{2} and width 20āˆ’5āˆ’3+6+320^{+6+3}_{-5-3} MeV/c2^{2} and the D2āˆ—(2460)0D_2^*(2460)^0 with mass 2465Ā±3Ā±32465 \pm 3 \pm 3 MeV/c2^{2} and width 28āˆ’7āˆ’6+8+628^{+8+6}_{-7-6} MeV/c2^{2}. Properties of these final states, including their decay angular distributions and spin-parity assignments, have been studied. We identify these two mesons as the jlight=3/2j_{light}=3/2 doublet predicted by HQET. We also obtain constraints on {\footnotesize Ī“S/(Ī“S+Ī“D)\Gamma_S/(\Gamma_S + \Gamma_D)} as a function of the cosine of the relative phase of the two amplitudes in the D1(2420)0D_1(2420)^0 decay.Comment: 15 pages in REVTEX format. hardcopies with figures can be obtained by sending mail to: [email protected]

    Measurement of the Decay Asymmetry Parameters in Ī›c+ā†’Ī›Ļ€+\Lambda_c^+ \to \Lambda\pi^+ and Ī›c+ā†’Ī£+Ļ€0\Lambda_c^+ \to \Sigma^+\pi^0

    Full text link
    We have measured the weak decay asymmetry parameters (\aLC ) for two \LC\ decay modes. Our measurements are \aLC = -0.94^{+0.21+0.12}_{-0.06-0.06} for the decay mode Ī›c+ā†’Ī›Ļ€+\Lambda_c^+ \to \Lambda\pi^+ and \aLC = -0.45\pm 0.31 \pm 0.06 for the decay mode Ī›cā†’Ī£+Ļ€0\Lambda_c \to \Sigma^+\pi^0 . By combining these measurements with the previously measured decay rates, we have extracted the parity-violating and parity-conserving amplitudes. These amplitudes are used to test models of nonleptonic charmed baryon decay.Comment: 11 pages including the figures. Uses REVTEX and psfig macros. Figures as uuencoded postscript. Also available as http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLNS/1995/CLNS95-1319.p

    Observation of the Īžc+\Xi_c^+ Charmed Baryon Decays to Ī£+Kāˆ’Ļ€+\Sigma^+ K^-\pi^+, Ī£+KĖ‰āˆ—0\Sigma^+ \bar{K}^{*0}, and Ī›Kāˆ’Ļ€+Ļ€+\Lambda K^-\pi^+\pi^+

    Full text link
    We have observed two new decay modes of the charmed baryon Īžc+\Xi_c^+ into Ī£+Kāˆ’Ļ€+\Sigma^+ K^-\pi^+ and Ī£+KĖ‰āˆ—0\Sigma^+ \bar{K}^{*0} using data collected with the CLEO II detector. We also present the first measurement of the branching fraction for the previously observed decay mode Īžc+ā†’Ī›Kāˆ’Ļ€+Ļ€+\Xi_c^+\to\Lambda K^-\pi^+\pi^+. The branching fractions for these three modes relative to Īžc+ā†’Īžāˆ’Ļ€+Ļ€+\Xi_c^+\to\Xi^-\pi^+\pi^+ are measured to be 1.18Ā±0.26Ā±0.171.18 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.17, 0.92Ā±0.27Ā±0.140.92 \pm 0.27 \pm 0.14, and 0.58Ā±0.16Ā±0.070.58 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.07, respectively.Comment: 12 page uuencoded postscript file, postscript file also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLN

    Role of genetic testing for inherited prostate cancer risk: Philadelphia prostate cancer consensus conference 2017

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Guidelines are limited for genetic testing for prostate cancer (PCA). The goal of this conference was to develop an expert consensus-dri

    Microflares and the Statistics of X-ray Flares

    Full text link
    This review surveys the statistics of solar X-ray flares, emphasising the new views that RHESSI has given us of the weaker events (the microflares). The new data reveal that these microflares strongly resemble more energetic events in most respects; they occur solely within active regions and exhibit high-temperature/nonthermal emissions in approximately the same proportion as major events. We discuss the distributions of flare parameters (e.g., peak flux) and how these parameters correlate, for instance via the Neupert effect. We also highlight the systematic biases involved in intercomparing data representing many decades of event magnitude. The intermittency of the flare/microflare occurrence, both in space and in time, argues that these discrete events do not explain general coronal heating, either in active regions or in the quiet Sun.Comment: To be published in Space Science Reviews (2011
    • ā€¦
    corecore