21 research outputs found

    Myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency in primary aldosteronism

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Available data indicate that patients with primary aldosteronism have an increased risk of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular risk seems to be, at least in part, independent of blood pressure (BP) values. Patients with primary aldosteronism have a greater prevalence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and subtle alterations of ventricular function, which might contribute to the increase in cardiovascular risk. Recently, a noninvasive approach for the estimation of LV mechanical efficiency, obtained by echocardiography has been proposed. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the determinants of myocardial mechanoenergetic efficiency index (MEEi), in a large group of patients with primary aldosteronism (n = 99) and in a control group of essential hypertensive patients (n = 99) matched for age, sex and BP values. RESULTS: No differences between groups for age, sex, BMI, BP values, glucose, lipid profile and renal function were observed. LV mass index was greater in primary aldosteronism vs. essential hypertensive patients (46.0 ± 16.7 vs. 36.9 ± 8.6 g/m2, P < 0.001); also relative wall thickness was greater in primary aldosteronism (0.36 ± 0.1 vs. 0.32 ± 0.4, P < 0.001). Left atrial dimensions were significantly greater in primary aldosteronism. Ejection fraction was not different between groups, while endocardial and midwall fractional shortening were lower in primary aldosteronism vs. essential hypertensive patients (40 ± 7 vs. 43 ± 6, and 18 ± 3 vs. 21 ± 2, both P < 0.01). MEEi was lower in primary aldosteronism vs. essential hypertensive patients (0.44 ± 0.14 vs. 0.52 ± 0.10 ml/s per g, P < 0.01). A negative correlation was observed between MEEi and aldosterone levels (r = -0.203, P < 0.05) and aldosterone : renin ratio (P = -0.172, P < 0.05); the correlation remained significant after adjustment for possible confounders. CONCLUSION: In patients with primary aldosteronism myocardial MEEi is lower as compared with essential hypertensive patients. A reduced MEEi may reflect an impairment of production and utilization of energy in the myocardium, which could lead to the occurrence of cardiovascular complications and therefore these findings may contribute to explain the increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with primary aldosteronism

    Hypertensive emergencies and urgencies: A single-centre experience in Northern Italy 2008-2015

    No full text
    Background: An increasing attention is given to emergency departments (EDs) admissions for an acute and severe rise in blood pressure (BP). Data on epidemiology and treatment of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies admitted to ED are still limited. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence, clinical presentation and treatment of patients admitted for hypertensive emergencies or hypertensive urgencies. Methods: Medical records of consecutive patients aged at least 18 years, admitted to the ED of the Spedali Civili in Brescia in 2008 and in 2015 and presenting with SBP at least 180mmHg and/or DBP at least 120mmHg were prospectively collected and analysed. Results: The prevalence of patients admitted with acute BP rise was 2.0% (nÂĽ1551, age 7014 years) in 2008 and 1.75% (nÂĽ1214, age 69.715 years) in 2015. According to the clinical presentation and the presence of acute organ damage, patients were defined hypertensive emergencies (20.4 and 15.4%, respectively, in 2008 and 2015) or as hypertensive urgencies (79.6 and 84.5%, respectively, in 2008 and 2015). SBP and DBP values were higher in patients with emergencies than in those with urgencies (BP 19315/10215 vs. 18913/ 9613mmHg in 2008 and 19217/9815 vs. 18912/ 9415mmHg in 2015, P<0.001 for both). Among hypertensive emergencies, the different forms of organ damage were 25% acute coronary syndromes and 1% aortic dissection in both periods, 34 and 38% acute heart failure, 40 and 37% stroke. Conclusion: Admission to the ED for hypertensive emergencies and hypertensive urgencies is still high. Diagnosis and treatment are still not appropriate and require the rapid application of recently published guideline
    corecore