Potential benefits of laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypass surgery

Background: This series aims to prove the positive impact of laparoscopic approach in aortofemoral bypass grafting. Methods : It concerns a retrospective non randomized study comparing 58 consecutive patients treated with laparoscopic procedure (n = 30) and with a standard open procedure (n = 28) in a single center. The different operating times, the complications and the follow-up of these two groups are compared Results : The demographics and angiographic data of the two groups were comparable. Operating time was longer in the laparoscopic group. However, we noticed a significant shorter hospitalisation stay (p < 0.0001) after the laparoscopic procedure with a mean 5.1 days. There was no significant difference of morbidity. Conclusion : We suggest that the trans-peritoneal approach is the best way in laparoscopic procedure in term of exposure and ergonomics. Laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass grafting is feasible, safe and effective. Shortening of operating time is observed as surgeon's experience grows

Timeliness of immunisations in preterm infants in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, preterm infants receive the immunisations at the same chronological age as recommended for term infants without correction for gestational age (GA). The aim of this paper was to describe the timeliness of the routine Dutch national immunisation schedule in preterm infants in their first year of life and to evaluate possible determinants of delay. METHODS: Preterm infants were prospectively recruited between October 2015 and October 2017 and stratified according to GA (<28, 28-32 and 32-36 weeks). Data from the baseline parental questionnaire, monthly parental questionnaires and medical records were used to determine the immunisation age and proportion of infants timely receiving the first immunisations (between 42 and 63 days). Results were compared between the GA and birth weight (BW) groups. Determinants associated with timeliness of immunisation were studied by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Timely start of immunisation occurs in 60.5% of preterm infants in the Netherlands. The proportion of infants receiving the first immunisation on time was lowest for the group with GA <28 weeks (37%). The mean age of the first immunisation across all GA groups was 62.7 days (range 33-118) and differed significantly between GA group <28 weeks and the other two GA groups of 28-32 and 32-36 weeks (p < 0.001). Similar results were seen when stratified by BW. Multivariate analysis showed that low socioeconomic status (SES) and prolonged hospitalisation beyond 37 weeks each negatively influenced timeliness of the first immunisation. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that start of immunisations was often delayed in prematures and differs for different GA groups, being lowest (37%) in infants <28 weeks GA. Lower SES and prolonged hospital stay beyond 37 weeks GA are important determinants of timeliness. Efforts to improve timeliness should focus most on counselling parents in lower SES

Association of Routine Infant Vaccinations With Antibody Levels Among Preterm Infants.

Importance: The standard schedule of national immunization programs for infants may not be sufficient to protect extremely and very preterm infants. Objective: To evaluate the immunogenicity of routine vaccinations administered to preterm infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study of preterm infants stratified according to gestational age recruited from 8 hospitals across the Netherlands between October 2015 and October 2017, with follow-up until 12 months of age (October 2018). In total, 296 premature infants were enrolled and compared with a control group of 66 healthy term infants from a 2011 study, immunized according to the same schedule with the same vaccines. Exposures: Three primary doses of the diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliomyelitis-Haemophilus influenza type b-hepatitis B combination vaccine were given at 2, 3, and 4 months after birth followed by a booster at 11 months and a 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine at 2, 4, and 11 months after birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were (1) proportion of preterm infants who achieved IgG antibody against vaccine antigens at concentrations above the internationally defined threshold for protection after the primary series and booster dose and (2) serum IgG geometric mean concentrations after the primary series and booster vaccination. Proportions and geometric mean concentrations were compared in preterm infants and the control group of term infants. Results: Of 296 preterm infants (56.1% male; mean gestational age, 30 weeks), complete samples before vaccination, 1 month after the primary series, and 1 month after the booster were obtained from 220 preterm infants (74.3%). After the primary series, the proportion of preterm infants across all gestational age groups who achieved protective IgG antibody levels against pertussis toxin, diphtheria, tetanus and 6 of 10 pneumococcal serotypes varied between 83.0% and 100%, Haemophilus influenzae type b between 34.7% and 46.2% (40.6% among all preterm infants overall), and pneumococcal serotypes 4, 6B, 18C, and 23F between 45.8% and 75.1%. After the booster dose, protective antibody levels were achieved in more than 95% of all preterm groups, except for Haemophilus influenzae type b (88.1%). In general, geometric mean concentrations of all vaccine-induced antibodies were significantly lower in all preterm infants vs term infants, except for pertussis toxin and pneumococcal serotypes 4 and 19F after the primary series and booster vaccination. Conclusions and Relevance: Among preterm infants, administration of routine vaccinations during the first year of life was associated with protective antibody levels against most antigens in the majority of infants after the primary series and booster, except for Haemophilus influenzae type b. However, antibody concentrations were generally lower among preterm infants compared with historical controls.

Effect of Palivizumab Prophylaxis on Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Very Preterm Infants in the First Year of Life in The Netherlands.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) poses a severe threat to infants, particularly preterm infants. Palivizumab, the standard preventive prophylaxis, is primarily utilized in high-risk newborns due to its cost. This study assessed palivizumab&rsquo;s effectiveness in preventing RSV infections in predominantly very preterm infants during their first year of life. Serum samples from a prospective multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands were analyzed to assess RSV infection rates by measuring IgG levels against three RSV proteins: nucleoprotein, pre-fusion, and post-fusion protein. Infants were stratified based on gestational age (GA), distinguishing very preterm (&le;32 weeks GA) from moderate/late preterm (&gt;32 to &le;36 weeks GA). In very preterm infants, palivizumab prophylaxis significantly reduced infection rates (18.9% vs. 48.3% in the prophylaxis vs. non-prophylaxis group. Accounting for GA, sex, birth season, and birth weight, the prophylaxis group showed significantly lower infection odds. In infants with &gt;32 to &le;36 weeks GA, the non-prophylaxis group (55.4%) showed infection rates similar to the non-prophylaxis &le;32-week GA group, despite higher maternal antibody levels in the moderate/late preterm infants. In conclusion, palivizumab prophylaxis significantly reduces RSV infection rates in very premature infants. Future research should explore clinical implications and reasons for non-compliance, and compare palivizumab with emerging prophylactics like nirsevimab aiming to optimize RSV prophylaxis and improve preterm infant outcomes