Inconsistency-Tolerant Integrity Checking

All methods for efficient integrity checking require all integrity constraints to be totally satisfied, before any update is executed. However, a certain amount of inconsistency is the rule, rather than the exception in databases. In this paper, we close the gap between theory and practice of integrity checking, i.e., between the unrealistic theoretical requirement of total integrity and the practical need for inconsistency tolerance, which we define for integrity checking methods. We show that most of them can still be used to check whether updates preserve integrity, even if the current state is inconsistent. Inconsistency-tolerant integrity checking proves beneficial both for integrity preservation and query answering. Also, we show that it is useful for view updating, repairs, schema evolution, and other applications.Hendrik Decker has been supported by FEDER and the Spanish MEC grant TIN2006-14738-C02-01. Davide Martinenghi has been supported by the Search Computing (SeCo) project, funded by ERC under the 2008 Call for "IDEAS Advanced Grants." The authors also wish to thank Davide Barbieri for his valuable contribution to the experimental evaluation.Decker, H.; Martinenghi, D. (2011). Inconsistency-Tolerant Integrity Checking. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 23(2):218-234. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2010.87S21823423

Keyword search in the Deep Web

The Deep Web is constituted by data accessible through Web pages, but not readily indexable by search engines, as they are returned in dynamic pages. In this paper we propose a framework for accessing Deep Web sources, represented as relational tables with so-called ac- cess limitations, with keyword-based queries. We formalize the notion of optimal answer and investigate methods for query processing. To our knowledge, this problem has never been studied in a systematic way

Optimization of multi-domain queries on the Web

Where can I attend an interesting database workshop close to a sunny beach? Who are the strongest experts on service computing based upon their recent publication record and accepted European projects? Can I spend an April week- end in a city served by a low-cost direct flight from Milano offering a Mahler's symphony? We regard the above queries as multi-domain queries, i.e., queries that can be answered by combining knowledge from two or more domains (such as: seaside locations, flights, publications, accepted projects, conference offerings, and so on). This information is avail- able on the Web, but no general-purpose software system can accept the above queries nor compute the answer. At the most, dedicated systems support specific multi-domain compositions (e.g., Google-local locates information such as restaurants and hotels upon geographic maps). This paper presents an overall framework for multi-domain queries on the Web. We address the following problems: (a) expressing multi-domain queries with an abstract formalism, (b) separating the treatment of "search" services within the model, by highlighting their dierences from "exact" Web services, (c) explaining how the same query can be mapped to multiple "query plans", i.e., a well-dened scheduling of service invocations, possibly in parallel, which complies with their access limitations and preserves the ranking order in which search services return results; (d) introducing cross- domain joins as first-class operation within plans; (e) eval- uating the query plans against several cost metrics so as to choose the most promising one for execution. This frame- work adapts to a variety of application contexts, ranging from end-user-oriented mash-up scenarios up to complex ap- plication integration scenarios

Time-resolved single-photon detection module based on silicon photomultiplier: A novel building block for time-correlated measurement systems

We present the design and preliminary characterization of the first detection module based on Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) tailored for single-photon timing applications. The aim of this work is to demonstrate, thanks to the design of a suitable module, the possibility to easily exploit SiPM in many applications as an interesting detector featuring large active area, similarly to photomultipliers tubes, but keeping the advantages of solid state detectors (high quantum efficiency, low cost, compactness, robustness, low bias voltage, and insensitiveness to magnetic field). The module integrates a cooled SiPM with a total photosensitive area of 1 mm2 together with the suitable avalanche signal read-out circuit, the signal conditioning, the biasing electronics, and a Peltier cooler driver for thermal stabilization. It is able to extract the single-photon timing information with resolution better than 100 ps full-width at half maximum. We verified the effective stabilization in response to external thermal perturbations, thus proving the complete insensitivity of the module to environment temperature variations, which represents a fundamental parameter to profitably use the instrument for real-field applications. We also characterized the single-photon timing resolution, the background noise due to both primary dark count generation and afterpulsing, the single-photon detection efficiency, and the instrument response function shape. The proposed module can become a reliable and cost-effective building block for time-correlated single-photon counting instruments in applications requiring high collection capability of isotropic light and detection efficiency (e.g., fluorescence decay measurements or time-domain diffuse optics systems)

Spectrally Resolved Single-Photon Timing of Silicon Photomultipliers for Time-Domain Diffuse Spectroscopy

We characterized the single-photon timing response function of various silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) over a broad (500-1100 nm) spectral range. We selected two SiPM manufacturers, and we investigated two active areas, i.e., a small (1-1.69 mm2 and a large (9 mm2) one, for each of them. We demonstrate that selected SiPMs are suitable for time-resolved diffuse optics (DO) applications where a very large detection area and sensitivity down to single photons are crucial to detecting the very faint return signal from biological tissues, like the brain, thus allowing replacement of photomultiplier tubes and opening the way to a novel generation of DO multichannel instrumentation. Due to our custom front-end electronics, we show the world's best single-photon timing resolution for SiPMs, namely, 57-ps full-width at half maximum for Hamamatsu 1.69 mm2 and 115 ps for Excelitas 9 mm2. Even further, we provide a thorough spectral investigation of the full single-photon timing response function, also detailing diffusion tails' time constants and dynamic range. The achieved insight and the reported performance open the way to a widespread diffusion of SiPMs not just in many-photon regimes (e.g., PET) but at single-photon counting regimes like DO as well

Large area silicon photomultipliers allow extreme depth penetration in time-domain diffuse optics

We present the design of a novel single-photon timing module, based on a Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) featuring a collection area of 9 mm2. The module performs Single-Photon Timing Resolution of about 140 ps, thus being suitable for diffuse optics application. The small size of the instrument (5 cm × 4 cm × 10 cm) allows placing it directly in contact with the sample under investigation, maximizing that way the signal harvesting. Thanks to that, it is possible to increase the source detector distance up to 6 cm or more, therefore enhancing the penetration depth up to an impressive value of 4 cm and paving the way to the exploration of the deepest human body structures in a completely non-invasive approach

Online Training of an Opto-Electronic Reservoir Computer

Reservoir Computing is a bio-inspired computing paradigm for processing time dependent signals. Its analog implementations equal and sometimes outperform other digital algorithms on a series of benchmark tasks. Their performance can be increased by switching from offline to online training method. Here we present the first online trained opto-electronic reservoir computer. The system is tested on a channel equalisation task and the algorithm is executed by an FPGA chip. We report performances close to previous implementations and demonstrate the benefits of online training on a non-stationary task that could not be easily solved using offline methods.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Measure-Based Inconsistency-Tolerant Maintenance of Database Integrity

[EN] To maintain integrity, constraint violations should be prevented or repaired. However, it may not be feasible to avoid inconsistency, or to repair all violations at once. Based on an abstract concept of violation measures, updates and repairs can be checked for keeping inconsistency bounded, such that integrity violations are guaranteed to never get out of control. This measure-based approach goes beyond conventional methods that are not meant to be applied in the presence of inconsistency. It also generalizes recently introduced concepts of inconsistency-tolerant integrity maintenance.Partially supported by FEDER and the Spanish grants TIN2009-14460-C03 and TIN2010-17139Decker, H. (2013). Measure-Based Inconsistency-Tolerant Maintenance of Database Integrity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 7693:149-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36008-4_7S1491737693Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley (1995)Abiteboul, S., Vianu, V.: A transaction-based approach to relational database specification. JACM 36(4), 758–789 (1989)Afrati, F., Kolaitis, P.: Repair checking in inconsistent databases: algorithms and complexity. In: 12th ICDT, pp. 31–41. ACM Press (2009)Arenas, M., Bertossi, L., Chomicki, J.: Consistent query answers in inconsistent databases. In: PODS 1999, pp. 68–79. ACM Press (1999)Arieli, O., Denecker, M., Bruynooghe, M.: Distance semantics for database repair. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 50, 389–415 (2007)Arni-Bloch, N., Ralyté, J., Léonard, M.: Service–Driven Information Systems Evolution: Handling Integrity Constraints Consistency. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 39, pp. 191–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Bauer, H.: Maß- und Integrationstheorie, 2. Auflage. De Gruyter (1992)Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Quasi-Classical Logic: Non-Trivializable Classical Reasoning from Inconsistent Information. In: Froidevaux, C., Kohlas, J. (eds.) ECSQARU 1995. LNCS, vol. 946, pp. 44–51. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Bohanon, P., Fan, W., Flaster, M., Rastogi, R.: A Cost-Based Model and Effective Heuristic for Repairing Constraints by Value Modification. In: Proc. SIGMOD 2005, pp. 143–154. ACM Press (2005)Ceri, S., Cochrane, R., Widom, J.: Practical Applications of Triggers and Constraints: Success and Lingering Issues. In: Proc. 26th VLDB, pp. 254–262. Morgan Kaufmann (2000)Chakravarthy, U., Grant, J., Minker, J.: Logic-based Approach to Semantic Query Optimization. Transactions on Database Systems 15(2), 162–207 (1990)Chomicki, J.: Consistent Query Answering: Five Easy Pieces. In: Schwentick, T., Suciu, D. (eds.) ICDT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4353, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Christiansen, H., Martinenghi, D.: On simplification of database integrity constraints. Fundamenta Informaticae 71(4), 371–417 (2006)Clark, K.: Negation as Failure. In: Gallaire, H., Minker, J. (eds.) Logic and Data Bases, pp. 293–322. Plenum Press (1978)Curino, C., Moon, H., Deutsch, A., Zaniolo, C.: Update Rewriting and Integrity Constraint Maintenance in a Schema Evolution Support System: PRISM++. PVLDB 4, 117–128 (2010)Dawson, J.: The compactness of first-order logic: From Gödel to Lindström. History and Philosophy of Logic 14(1), 15–37 (1993)Decker, H.: The Range Form of Databases and Queries or: How to Avoid Floundering. In: Proc. 5th ÖGAI. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol. 208, pp. 114–123. Springer (1989)Decker, H.: Drawing Updates From Derivations. In: Kanellakis, P.C., Abiteboul, S. (eds.) ICDT 1990. LNCS, vol. 470, pp. 437–451. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)Decker, H.: Extending Inconsistency-Tolerant Integrity Checking by Semantic Query Optimization. In: Bhowmick, S.S., Küng, J., Wagner, R. (eds.) DEXA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5181, pp. 89–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Decker, H.: Answers That Have Integrity. In: Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B. (eds.) SDKB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6834, pp. 54–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Decker, H.: Causes of the Violation of Integrity Constraints for Supporting the Quality of Databases. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Iglesias, A., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2011, Part V. LNCS, vol. 6786, pp. 283–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Decker, H.: Inconsistency-tolerant Integrity Checking based on Inconsistency Metrics. In: König, A., Dengel, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kise, K., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6882, pp. 548–558. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Decker, H.: Partial Repairs that Tolerate Inconsistency. In: Eder, J., Bielikova, M., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) ADBIS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6909, pp. 389–400. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Decker, H.: Consistent Explanations of Answers to Queries in Inconsistent Knowledge Bases. In: Roth-Berghofer, T., Tintarev, N., Leake, D. (eds.) Explanation-aware Computing, Proc. IJCAI 2011 Workshop ExaCt 2011, pp. 71–80 (2011), http://exact2011.workshop.hm/index.phpDecker, H., Martinenghi, D.: Classifying integrity checking methods with regard to inconsistency tolerance. In: Proc. PPDP 2008, pp. 195–204. ACM Press (2008)Decker, H., Martinenghi, D.: Modeling, Measuring and Monitoring the Quality of Information. In: Heuser, C.A., Pernul, G. (eds.) ER 2009. LNCS, vol. 5833, pp. 212–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Decker, H., Martinenghi, D.: Inconsistency-tolerant Integrity Checking. IEEE TKDE 23(2), 218–234 (2011)Decker, H., Muñoz-Escoí, F.D.: Revisiting and Improving a Result on Integrity Preservation by Concurrent Transactions. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2010 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 6428, pp. 297–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Dung, P., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: Dialectic Proof Procedures for Assumption-based Admissible Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 170(2), 114–159 (2006)Ebbinghaus, H.-D., Flum, J.: Finite Model Theory, 2nd edn. Springer (2006)Embury, S., Brandt, S., Robinson, J., Sutherland, I., Bisby, F., Gray, A., Jones, A., White, R.: Adapting integrity enforcement techniques for data reconciliation. Information Systems 26, 657–689 (2001)Enderton, H.: A Mathematical Introduction to Logic, 2nd edn. Academic Press (2001)Eiter, T., Fink, M., Greco, G., Lembo, D.: Repair localization for query answering from inconsistent databases. ACM TODS 33(2), article 10 (2008)Furfaro, F., Greco, S., Molinaro, C.: A three-valued semantics for querying and repairing inconsistent databases. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 51(2-4), 167–193 (2007)Grant, J., Hunter, A.: Measuring the Good and the Bad in Inconsistent Information. In: Proc. 22nd IJCAI, pp. 2632–2637 (2011)Greco, G., Greco, S., Zumpano, E.: A logical framework for querying and repairing inconsistent databases. IEEE TKDE 15(6), 1389–1408 (2003)Guessoum, A., Lloyd, J.: Updating knowledge bases. New Generation Computing 8(1), 71–89 (1990)Guessoum, A., Lloyd, J.: Updating knowledge bases II. New Generation Computing 10(1), 73–100 (1991)Gupta, A., Sagiv, Y., Ullman, J., Widom, J.: Constraint checking with partial information. In: Proc. PODS 1994, pp. 45–55. ACM Press (1994)Hunter, A.: Measuring Inconsistency in Knowledge via Quasi-Classical Models. In: Proc. 18th AAAI &14th IAAI, pp. 68–73 (2002)Hunter, A., Konieczny, S.: Approaches to Measuring Inconsistent Information. In: Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T. (eds.) Inconsistency Tolerance. LNCS, vol. 3300, pp. 191–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Hunter, A., Konieczny, S.: Measuring inconsistency through minimal inconsistent sets. In: Brewka, G., Lang, J. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Proc. 11th KR), pp. 358–366. AAAI Press (2008)Hunter, A., Konieczny, S.: On the measure of conflicts: Shapley Inconsistency Values. Artificial Intelligence 174, 1007–1026 (2010)Kakas, A., Mancarella, P.: Database updates through abduction. In: Proc. 16th VLDB, pp. 650–661. Morgan Kaufmann (1990)Kakas, A., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: The role of Abduction in Logic Programming. In: Gabbay, D., Hogger, C., Robinson, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 5, pp. 235–324. Oxford University Press (1998)Lee, S.Y., Ling, T.W.: Further improvements on integrity constraint checking for stratifiable deductive databases. In: Proc. VLDB 1996, pp. 495–505. Morgan Kaufmann (1996)Lehrer, K.: Relevant Deduction and Minimally Inconsistent Sets. Journal of Philosophy 3(2,3), 153–165 (1973)Mu, K., Liu, W., Jin, Z., Bell, D.: A Syntax-based Approach to Measuring the Degree of Inconsistency for Belief Bases. J. Approx. Reasoning 52(7), 978–999 (2011)Lloyd, J., Sonenberg, L., Topor, R.: Integrity constraint checking in stratified databases. J. Logic Programming 4(4), 331–343 (1987)Lozinskii, E.: Resolving contradictions: A plausible semantics for inconsistent systems. J. Automated Reasoning 12(1), 1–31 (1994)Ma, Y., Qi, G., Hitzler, P.: Computing inconsistency measure based on paraconsistent semantics. J. Logic Computation 21(6), 1257–1281 (2011)Martinenghi, D., Christiansen, H.: Transaction Management with Integrity Checking. In: Andersen, K.V., Debenham, J., Wagner, R. (eds.) DEXA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3588, pp. 606–615. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Martinenghi, D., Christiansen, H., Decker, H.: Integrity Checking and Maintenance in Relational and Deductive Databases and Beyond. In: Ma, Z. (ed.) Intelligent Databases: Technologies and Applications, pp. 238–285. IGI Global (2006)Martinez, M.V., Pugliese, A., Simari, G.I., Subrahmanian, V.S., Prade, H.: How Dirty Is Your Relational Database? An Axiomatic Approach. In: Mellouli, K. (ed.) ECSQARU 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4724, pp. 103–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Meyer, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.): Deontic Logic in Computer Science. Wiley (1994)Nicolas, J.M.: Logic for improving integrity checking in relational data bases. Acta Informatica 18, 227–253 (1982)Plexousakis, D., Mylopoulos, J.: Accommodating Integrity Constraints During Database Design. In: Apers, P.M.G., Bouzeghoub, M., Gardarin, G. (eds.) EDBT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1057, pp. 495–513. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)Rahm, E., Do, H.: Data Cleaning: Problems and Current Approaches. Data Engineering Bulletin 23(4), 3–13 (2000)Sadri, F., Kowalski, R.: A theorem-proving approach to database integrity. In: Minker, J. (ed.) Foundations of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming, pp. 313–362. Morgan Kaufmann (1988)Thimm, M.: Measuring Inconsistency in Probabilistic Knowledge Bases. In: Proc. 25th UAI, pp. 530–537. AUAI Press (2009)Vardi, M.: On the integrity of databases with incomplete information. In: Proc. 5th PODS, pp. 252–266. ACM Press (1986)Wijsen, J.: Database repairing using updates. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 30(3), 722–768 (2005