Rebleeding rate after interventional therapy directed by capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The precise role of capsule endoscopy in the diagnostic algorithm of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding has yet to be determined. Despite the higher diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy, the actual impact on clinical outcome remains poorly defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the follow-up results of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding to determine which management strategies after capsule endoscopy reduced rebleeding.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All patients in whom the cause of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding was investigated between May 2004 and March 2007 were studied retrospectively. We evaluated the clinical outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy using the rebleeding rate as the primary outcome.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Seventy-seven patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding underwent capsule endoscopy. Capsule endoscopy identified clinically significant findings that were thought to be the sources of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in 58.4% of the patients. The overall rebleeding rate was 36.4%. The rebleeding rate was significantly higher among patients with insignificant findings than among those with significant findings (<it>p </it>= 0.036). Among the patients in whom capsule endoscopy produced significant findings, the rebleeding rate of the patients who underwent therapeutic interventions was significantly lower than that in those who did not undergo intervention (9.5% vs 40.0%, <it>p </it>= 0.046).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Follow-up and further aggressive interventions are necessary for patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and significant capsule endoscopy findings to reduce the chance of rebleeding.</p

Serological Markers for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in AIDS Patients with Evidence of Microbial Translocation

Background: Breakdown of the gut mucosal barrier during chronic HIV infection allows translocation of bacterial products such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from the gut into the circulation. Microbial translocation also occurs in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD serological markers are useful in the diagnosis of IBD and to differentiate between Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we evaluate detection of IBD serological markers in HIV-infected patients with advanced disease and their relationship to HIV disease markers.Methods IBD serological markers (ASCA, pANCA, anti-OmpC, and anti-CBir1) were measured by ELISA in plasma from AIDS patients (n = 26) with low CD4 counts (<300 cells/$\mu$l) and high plasma LPS levels, and results correlated with clinical data. For meta-analysis, relevant data were abstracted from 20 articles. Results: IBD serological markers were detected in approximately 65% of AIDS patients with evidence of microbial translocation. An antibody pattern consistent with IBD was detected in 46%; of these, 75% had a CD-like pattern. Meta-analysis of data from 20 published studies on IBD serological markers in CD, UC, and non-IBD control subjects indicated that IBD serological markers are detected more frequently in AIDS patients than in non-IBD disease controls and healthy controls, but less frequently than in CD patients. There was no association between IBD serological markers and HIV disease markers (plasma viral load and CD4 counts) in the study cohort. Conclusions: IBD serological markers may provide a non-invasive approach to monitor HIV-related inflammatory gut disease. Further studies to investigate their clinical significance in HIV-infected individuals are warranted

Selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of hypersensitive esophagus

In patients with proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) resistant reflux symptoms, ambulatory 24 h pH impedance monitoring can be used to assess whether a relationship exists between symptoms and reflux episodes. Using this technique it has been suggested that patients with typical reflux symptoms and a normal upper endoscopy should be subclassified as follows: normal endoscopy and abnormal distal acid esophageal exposure (patients with acid reflux); normal endoscopy, with normal distal acid esophageal exposure and a positive symptom association for either acid or nonacid reflux (patients with hypersensitive esophagus); and normal endoscopy, normal distal acid esophageal exposure and a negative symptom association for acid and nonacid reflux (patients with functional heartburn). Although for patients with a normal endoscopy and abnormal distal acid esophageal exposure more aggressive acid suppression can be recommended, managing patients with hypersensitive esophagus and functional heartburn remains a real challenge

Bleeding lesions within reach of conventional endoscopy in capsule endoscopy examinations for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: Is repeating endoscopy economically feasible?

Background: Most tertiary gastroenterology centers currently offer an open-access capsule endoscopy (CE) service, including patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. However, CE may identify lesions missed by conventional endoscopy. Aims: To determine the incidence of bleeding lesions missed by the preceding gastroscopy/colonoscopy that were revealed by CE and compare potential differences in the rate of identifying such lesions in patients that we investigated as opposed to those investigated elsewhere. Methods: We prospectively reviewed data from patients subjected to CE for obscure bleeding. We analyzed all cases where a source of bleeding was located in the stomach, duodenum, or colon. Results: A total of 317 consecutive patients were subjected to CE for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding within 28 months. Prior to CE examination, 174 patients had gastroscopy and colonoscopy in our institutions and 143 were referrals, all with negative endoscopic investigation. We identified 11 (3.5%) cases where the source of bleeding was found in the stomach (n = 4) or the cecum (n = 7). There was a significant difference of extra small intestinal lesions diagnosed by CE between referrals (9/143, 6.3%) and endoscopic investigation performed in our institutions (2/174, 1.15%), (p = 0.026). The estimated cost of re-endoscoping in our institution all CE referrals would be €50,050 (143 patients × €350), to avoid unnecessary CE examinations (9 patients × €600 = €5,400). Conclusions: Reading the whole CE video is important, because small-bowel CE may identify lesions responsible for obscure bleeding missed by the preceding gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Repeating conventional endoscopy by experts before CE is not a cost-effective approach. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

Comparative study of mutations in single nucleotide polymorphism loci of KRAS and BRAF genes in patients who underwent screening colonoscopy, with and without premalignant intestinal polyps

Aim: Our aim was to perform a comparison study of the mutation rate of V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), and v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog-B (BRAF) genes between bloodbased cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and tissue sample biopsies in individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy. Materials and Methods: All specimens were collected from January 2015 to January 2016. A total of 92 blood samples and colonic biopsy specimens were collected from healthy individuals with no polyps undergoing screening colonoscopy (group A, n=35), patients with colorectal cancer (group B, n=27), and patients with neoplastic intestinal polyps (group C, n=30). Peripheral blood was collected from each patient and a focal tissue biopsy was conducted. Results: We only found a limited statistically significant difference (p=0.046) in the mutation analysis for codon 12 of the KRAS gene when we compared tissue biopsies from patients in group B to those from group C. In the blood samples, only the rate of mutation in codon 12 of the KRAS gene in samples of group B was significantly higher than that in group A (p=0.013). Conclusion: Blood cfDNA may be a promising tool in CRC screening as it may discriminate patients with CRC compared to healthy individuals and those with colonic polyps, even though it does not appear useful in predicting the presence of colonic polyps