Implementation of Image Reconstruction for GE SIGNA PET/MR PET Data in the STIR Library

Software for Tomographic Image Reconstruction (STIR: http://stir.sf.net) is an open source C++ library available for reconstruction of emission tomography data. This work aims at the incorporation of the GE SIGNA PET/MR scanner in STIR and enables PET image reconstruction with data corrections. The data extracted from the scanner after an acquisition includes a list of raw data files (emission, normalisation, geometric and well counter calibration (wcc) factors), magnetic resonance attenuation correction (MRAC) images and the scanner-based reconstructions. The listmode (LM) file stores a list of 'prompt' events and the singles per crystal per second. MRAC images from the scanner are used for attenuation correction. The modifications to STIR that allow accurate histogramming of this LM data in the same sinogram organisation as the scanner are also described. This allows reconstruction of acquisition data with all data corrections using STIR, and independent of any software supplied by the manufacturer. The implementations were validated by comparing the histogrammed data, data corrections and final reconstruction using the ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) algorithm with the equivalents from the GE-toolbox, supplied by the manufacturer for the scanner. There is no difference in the histogrammed counts whereas an overall relative difference of 6.7 × 10 -8 % and from 0.01% to 0.86% is seen in the normalisation and randoms correction sinograms respectively. The STIR reconstructed images have similar resolution and quantification but have some residual differences due to wcc factors, decay and deadtime corrections, as well as the offset between PET and MR gantries that will be addressed in future work. This work will enable the use of all current and future STIR algorithms, including penalized image reconstruction, motion correction and direct parametric image estimation, on data from GE SIGNA PET/MR scanners

Parallel processes:Getting it write?

This paper offers a critical reflection on the processes surrounding the writing of a book aimed at foster carers and residential workers. By utilising the concept of parallel process as well as the four modes of reflection identified by Ruch (2000), we explore the ways in which the wider context of both direct works with children and reflective practice have been impacted by the tensions between relationally based, child-centred practice and wider managerialist imperatives. The paper draws parallels between these practice tensions and those currently in play within the academy. By employing a dialogical and reflective analysis of the process and interactions surrounding the writing of a practitioner-targeted book, the paper demonstrates the ways in which critical and process reflection post-event took place, considering the heretofore unexplored parallel processes between writing for practice, and practice. In so doing, it identifies the ways in which the authors mirrored practitioners in relation to the management of anxiety, a sense of constrained autonomy and confidence, and an avoidance of recognising and challenging structural and political context. Implications for the creation of practice literature and for the academy are considered.Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Onlin