Sol-gel processing of a covalent organic framework for the generation of hierarchically porous monolithic adsorbents

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have emerged as a versatile material platform for such applications as chemical separations, chemical reaction engineering, and energy storage. Their inherently low mechanical stability, however, frequently renders existing methods of pelletization ineffective, contributing to pore collapse, pore blockage, or insufficient densification of crystallites. Here, we present a process for the shaping and densifying of COFs into robust centimeter-scale porous monoliths without the need for templates, additives, or binders. This process minimizes mechanical damage from shear-induced plastic deformation and further provides a network of interparticle mesopores that we exploit in accessing analyte capacities above those achievable from the intrinsic COF structure. Using a lattice-gas model, we accurately capture the monolithic structure across the mesoporous range and tie pore architecture to performance in both gas-storage and -separation applications. Collectively, these results represent a substantial step in the practical applicability of COFs and other mechanically weak porous materials

Densified HKUST‑1 Monoliths as a Route to High Volumetric and Gravimetric Hydrogen Storage Capacity

We are currently witnessing the dawn of hydrogen (H2) economy, where H2 will soon become a primary fuel for heating, transportation, and long-distance and long-term energy storage. Among diverse possibilities, H2 can be stored as a pressurized gas, a cryogenic liquid, or a solid fuel via adsorption onto porous materials. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as adsorbent materials with the highest theoretical H2 storage densities on both a volumetric and gravimetric basis. However, a critical bottleneck for the use of H2 as a transportation fuel has been the lack of densification methods capable of shaping MOFs into practical formulations while maintaining their adsorptive performance. Here, we report a high-throughput screening and deep analysis of a database of MOFs to find optimal materials, followed by the synthesis, characterization, and performance evaluation of an optimal monolithic MOF (monoMOF) for H2 storage. After densification, this monoMOF stores 46 g L–1 H2 at 50 bar and 77 K and delivers 41 and 42 g L–1 H2 at operating pressures of 25 and 50 bar, respectively, when deployed in a combined temperature–pressure (25–50 bar/77 K → 5 bar/160 K) swing gas delivery system. This performance represents up to an 80% reduction in the operating pressure requirements for delivering H2 gas when compared with benchmark materials and an 83% reduction compared to compressed H2 gas. Our findings represent a substantial step forward in the application of high-density materials for volumetric H2 storage applications

Densified HKUST‑1 Monoliths as a Route to High Volumetric and Gravimetric Hydrogen Storage Capacity

We are currently witnessing the dawn of hydrogen (H2) economy, where H2 will soon become a primary fuel for heating, transportation, and long-distance and long-term energy storage. Among diverse possibilities, H2 can be stored as a pressurized gas, a cryogenic liquid, or a solid fuel via adsorption onto porous materials. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as adsorbent materials with the highest theoretical H2 storage densities on both a volumetric and gravimetric basis. However, a critical bottleneck for the use of H2 as a transportation fuel has been the lack of densification methods capable of shaping MOFs into practical formulations while maintaining their adsorptive performance. Here, we report a high-throughput screening and deep analysis of a database of MOFs to find optimal materials, followed by the synthesis, characterization, and performance evaluation of an optimal monolithic MOF (monoMOF) for H2 storage. After densification, this monoMOF stores 46 g L–1 H2 at 50 bar and 77 K and delivers 41 and 42 g L–1 H2 at operating pressures of 25 and 50 bar, respectively, when deployed in a combined temperature–pressure (25–50 bar/77 K → 5 bar/160 K) swing gas delivery system. This performance represents up to an 80% reduction in the operating pressure requirements for delivering H2 gas when compared with benchmark materials and an 83% reduction compared to compressed H2 gas. Our findings represent a substantial step forward in the application of high-density materials for volumetric H2 storage applications