Which clinical variables have the most significant correlation with quality of life evaluated by SF-36 survey in Croatian cohort of patient with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis?

The aim of our study was to assess clinical variables with the best correlation to quality of life (QOL) assessed by medical outcome survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36) in patients with spondyloarthritides, including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We analyzed the cohort of 54 patients (22 patients with PsA and 32 patients with AS), who filled the Croatian version of SF-36. For each type of arthritis, patients were clinically evaluated using the extensive list of clinical variables categorized into subjective and objective group. For AS patients, subjective and objective variables (spinal mobility measurements, clinical assessment of spinal pain, patient assessments of disease activity and pain) correlated mainly with the physical functioning concept of SF-36. Patients assessments of fatigue correlated with the energy/fatigue subscale, whereas patient assessment of enthesial pain correlated with the pain subscale. Correlations between clinical variables and SF-36 concepts of PsA patients showed more diverse distribution than for AS. Objective variables (spinal mobility measurements, a 76-joint score, clinical assessment of spinal pain) correlated with concepts concerning physical health and pain. Several subjective patient assessments correlated with energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, pain and general health subscales. Both patient and physician assessment of PsA activity correlated with the role limitations due to emotional problems. Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI) had the strongest correlation with the physical functioning concept of SF-36 in both diseases. Our findings provide important information to help selecting the variables with strongest impact on QOL, for better planning the management strategies and achieving better rehabilitation results

Situational factors shape moral judgments in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern, and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample

The study of moral judgements often centers on moral dilemmas in which options consistent with deontological perspectives (i.e., emphasizing rules, individual rights, and duties) are in conflict with options consistent with utilitarian judgements (i.e., following the greater good based on consequences). Greene et al. (2009) showed that psychological and situational factors (e.g., the intent of the agent or the presence of physical contact between the agent and the victim) can play an important role in moral dilemma judgements (e.g., trolley problem). Our knowledge is limited concerning both the universality of these effects outside the United States and the impact of culture on the situational and psychological factors of moral judgements. Thus, we empirically tested the universality of the effects of intent and personal force on moral dilemma judgements by replicating the experiments of Greene et al. in 45 countries from all inhabited continents. We found that personal force and its interaction with intention, exert influence on moral judgements in the US and Western cultural clusters, replicating and expanding the original findings. Moreover, the personal force effect was present in all cultural clusters, suggesting it is culturally universal. The evidence for the cultural universality of the interaction effect was inconclusive in the Eastern and Southern cultural clusters (depending on exclusion criteria). We found no strong association between collectivism/individualism and moral dilemma judgements