20,193,036 research outputs found

    Precision Measurement of the Ds+Ds+D_s^{*+}- D_s^+ Mass Difference

    Get PDF
    We have measured the vector-pseudoscalar mass splitting M(Ds+)M(Ds+)=144.22±0.47±0.37MeVM(D_s^{*+})-M(D_s^+) = 144.22\pm 0.47\pm 0.37 MeV, significantly more precise than the previous world average. We minimize the systematic errors by also measuring the vector-pseudoscalar mass difference M(D0)M(D0)M(D^{*0})-M(D^0) using the radiative decay D0D0γD^{*0}\rightarrow D^0\gamma, obtaining [M(Ds+)M(Ds+)][M(D0)M(D0)]=2.09±0.47±0.37MeV[M(D_s^{*+})-M(D_s^+)]-[M(D^{*0})-M(D^0)] = 2.09\pm 0.47\pm 0.37 MeV. This is then combined with our previous high-precision measurement of M(D0)M(D0)M(D^{*0})-M(D^0), which used the decay D0D0π0D^{*0}\rightarrow D^0\pi^0. We also measure the mass difference M(Ds+)M(D+)=99.5±0.6±0.3M(D_s^+)-M(D^+)=99.5\pm 0.6\pm 0.3 MeV, using the ϕπ+\phi\pi^+ decay modes of the Ds+D_s^+ and D+D^+ mesons.Comment: 18 pages uuencoded compressed postscript (process with uudecode then gunzip). hardcopies with figures can be obtained by sending mail to: [email protected]

    D-branes from M-branes

    Get PDF
    The 2-brane and 4-brane solutions of ten dimensional IIA supergravity have a dual interpretation as Dirichlet-branes, or `D-branes', of type IIA superstring theory and as `M-branes' of an S1S^1-compactified eleven dimensional supermembrane theory, or M-theory. This eleven-dimensional connection is used to determine the ten-dimensional Lorentz covariant worldvolume action for the Dirichlet super 2-brane, and its coupling to background spacetime fields. It is further used to show that the 2-brane can carry the Ramond-Ramond charge of the Dirichlet 0-brane as a topological charge, and an interpretation of the 2-brane as a 0-brane condensate is suggested. Similar results are found for the Dirichlet 4-brane via its interpretation as a double-dimensional reduction of the eleven-dimensional fivebrane. It is suggested that the latter be interpreted as a D-brane of an open eleven-dimensional supermembrane.Comment: Version to appear in Physics Letters B. Incorporates minor revisions to previous revised version. 16 p

    Equitable (d,m)(d,m)-edge designs

    Get PDF
    The paper addresses design of experiments for classifying the input factors of a multi-variate function into negligible, linear and other (non-linear/interaction) factors. We give constructive procedures for completing the definition of the clustered designs proposed Morris 1991, that become defined for arbitrary number of input factors and desired clusters' multiplicity. Our work is based on a representation of subgraphs of the hyper-cube by polynomials that allows the formal verification of the designs' properties. Ability to generate these designs in a systematic manner opens new perspectives for the characterisation of the behaviour of the function's derivatives over the input space that may offer increased discrimination

    A remark on approximation with polynomials and greedy bases

    Full text link
    We investigate properties of the mm-th error of approximation by polynomials with constant coefficients Dm(x)\mathcal{D}_{m}(x) and with modulus-constant coefficients Dm(x)\mathcal{D}_{m}^{\ast}(x) introduced by Bern\'a and Blasco (2016) to study greedy bases in Banach spaces. We characterize when lim infmDm(x)\liminf_{m}{\mathcal{D}_{m}(x)} and lim infmDm(x)\liminf_{m}{\mathcal{D}_{m}^*(x)} are equivalent to x\| x\| in terms of the democracy and superdemocracy functions, and provide sufficient conditions ensuring that limmDm(x)=limmDm(x)=x\lim_{m}{\mathcal{D}_{m}^*(x)} = \lim_{m}{\mathcal{D}_{m}(x)} = \| x\|, extending previous very particular results

    Derivations of the Lie Algebras of Differential Operators

    Get PDF
    This paper encloses a complete and explicit description of the derivations of the Lie algebra D(M) of all linear differential operators of a smooth manifold M, of its Lie subalgebra D^1(M) of all linear first-order differential operators of M, and of the Poisson algebra S(M)=Pol(T*M) of all polynomial functions on T*M, the symbols of the operators in D(M). It turns out that, in terms of the Chevalley cohomology, H^1(D(M),D(M))=H^1_{DR}(M), H^1(D^1(M),D^1(M))=H^1_{DR}(M)\oplus\R^2, and H^1(S(M),S(M))=H^1_{DR}(M)\oplus\R. The problem of distinguishing those derivations that generate one-parameter groups of automorphisms and describing these one-parameter groups is also solved.Comment: LaTeX, 15 page
    corecore