Understanding the e+e−→D(∗)+D(∗)−e^+e^-\to D^{(*)+}D^{(*)-} processes observed by Belle

We calculate the production cross sections for $D^{*+}D^{*-}$, $D^+D^{*-}$ and $D^+D^-$ in $e^+e^-$ annihilation through one virtual photon in the framework of perturbative QCD with constituent quarks. The calculated cross sections for $D^{*+}D^{*-}$ and $D^+D^{*-}$ production are roughly in agreement with the recent Belle data. The helicity decomposition for $D^{*}$ meson production is also calculated. The fraction of the $D^{*\pm}_LD^{*\mp}_T$ final state in $e^+e^-\to D^{*+}D^{*-}$ process is found to be 65%. The fraction of $DD^*_T$ production is 100% and $DD^*_L$ is forbidden in $e^+e^-$ annihilation through one virtual photon. We further consider $e^+e^-$ annihilation through two virtual photons, and then find the fraction of $DD^{*}_T$ in $e^+e^-\to DD^{*}$ process to be about 91%.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figure

A Study of the Decays D^0 --> pi^- e^+ nu_e, D^0 --> K^- e^+ nu_e, D^+ --> pi^0 e^+ nu_e, and D^+ --> barK^0 e^+ nu_e

Using 1.8 million DDbar pairs and a neutrino reconstruction technique, we have studied the decays D^0 -> K^- e^+ nu_e, D^0 -> pi^- e^+ nu_e, D^+ -> Kbar^0 e^+ nu_e, and D^+ -> pi^0 e^+ nu_e. We find B(D^0 -> pi^- e^+ nu_e) = 0.299(11)(9)%, B(D^+ -> pi^0 e^+ nu_e) = 0.373(22)(13)%, B(D^0 -> K^- e^+ nu_e) = 3.56(3)(9)%, and B(D^+ -> Kbar^0 e^+ nu_e) = 8.53(13)(23)%. In addition, form factors are studied through fits to the partial branching fractions obtained in five q^2 ranges. By combining our results with recent unquenched lattice calculations, we obtain |Vcd| = 0.217(9)(4)(23) and |Vcs| = 1.015(10)(11)(106).Comment: 9 pages, postscript also available through http://www.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLNS/2006/, submitted to PR

Inner multipliers and Rudin type invariant subspaces

Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a Hilbert space and $H^2_{\mathcal{E}}(\mathbb{D})$ be the $\mathcal{E}$-valued Hardy space over the unit disc $\mathbb{D}$ in $\mathbb{C}$. The well known Beurling-Lax-Halmos theorem states that every shift invariant subspace of $H^2_{\mathcal{E}}(\mathbb{D})$ other than $\{0\}$ has the form $\Theta H^2_{\mathcal{E}_*}(\mathbb{D})$, where $\Theta$ is an operator-valued inner multiplier in $H^\infty_{B(\mathcal{E}_*, \mathcal{E})}(\mathbb{D})$ for some Hilbert space $\mathcal{E}_*$. In this paper we identify $H^2(\mathbb{D}^n)$ with $H^2(\mathbb{D}^{n-1})$-valued Hardy space $H^2_{H^2(\mathbb{D}^{n-1})}(\mathbb{D})$ and classify all such inner multiplier $\Theta \in H^\infty_{\mathcal{B}(H^2(\mathbb{D}^{n-1}))}(\mathbb{D})$ for which $\Theta H^2_{H^2(\mathbb{D}^{n-1})}(\mathbb{D})$ is a Rudin type invariant subspace of $H^2(\mathbb{D}^n)$.Comment: 8 page

Graph algebras and orbit equivalence

We introduce the notion of orbit equivalence of directed graphs, following Matsumoto’s notion of continuous orbit equivalence for topological Markov shifts. We show that two graphs in which every cycle has an exit are orbit equivalent if and only if there is a diagonal-preserving isomorphism between their C∗C∗-algebras. We show that it is necessary to assume that every cycle has an exit for the forward implication, but that the reverse implication holds for arbitrary graphs. As part of our analysis of arbitrary graphs EE we construct a groupoid G(C∗(E),D(E))G(C∗(E),D(E)) from the graph algebra C∗(E)C∗(E) and its diagonal subalgebra D(E)D(E) which generalises Renault’s Weyl groupoid construction applied to (C∗(E),D(E))(C∗(E),D(E)). We show that G(C∗(E),D(E))G(C∗(E),D(E)) recovers the graph groupoid GEGE without the assumption that every cycle in EE has an exit, which is required to apply Renault’s results to (C∗(E),D(E))(C∗(E),D(E)). We finish with applications of our results to out-splittings of graphs and to amplified graphs

On Astala's theorem for martingales and Fourier multipliers

We exhibit a large class of symbols $m$ on $\R^d$, $d\geq 2$, for which the corresponding Fourier multipliers $T_m$ satisfy the following inequality. If $D$, $E$ are measurable subsets of $\R^d$ with $E\subseteq D$ and $|D|<\infty$, then \int_{D\setminus E} |T_{m}\chi_E(x)|\mbox{d}x\leq \begin{cases} |E|+|E|\ln\left(\frac{|D|}{2|E|}\right), & \mbox{if}|E|<|D|/2, |D\setminus E|+\frac{1}{2}|D \setminus E|\ln \left(\frac{|E|}{|D\setminus E|}\right), & \mbox{if}|E|\geq |D|/2. \end{cases}. Here $|\cdot|$ denotes the Lebesgue measure on \bR^d. When $d=2$, these multipliers include the real and imaginary parts of the Beurling-Ahlfors operator $B$ and hence the inequality is also valid for $B$ with the right-hand side multiplied by $\sqrt{2}$. The inequality is sharp for the real and imaginary parts of $B$. This work is motivated by K. Astala's celebrated results on the Gehring-Reich conjecture concerning the distortion of area by quasiconformal maps. The proof rests on probabilistic methods and exploits a family of appropriate novel sharp inequalities for differentially subordinate martingales. These martingale bounds are of interest on their own right

Singular 0/1-matrices, and the hyperplanes spanned by random 0/1-vectors

Let $P(d)$ be the probability that a random 0/1-matrix of size $d \times d$ is singular, and let $E(d)$ be the expected number of 0/1-vectors in the linear subspace spanned by d-1 random independent 0/1-vectors. (So $E(d)$ is the expected number of cube vertices on a random affine hyperplane spanned by vertices of the cube.) We prove that bounds on $P(d)$ are equivalent to bounds on $E(d)$: $$P(d) = (2^{-d} E(d) + \frac{d^2}{2^{d+1}}) (1 + o(1)).$$ We also report about computational experiments pertaining to these numbers.Comment: 9 page