Hysterektomi i Norge 2008–18

Background: Hysterectomy is a common gynaecological procedure. No Norwegian guidelines for the choice of hysterectomy surgical method exist, but international guidelines recommend minimally invasive surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the kinds of surgical methods that were used for hysterectomies in the period 2008-18. Furthermore, we wished to identify the scope of robot-assisted hysterectomies and to find out whether salpingectomies are undertaken on a benign indication in Norway. Material and method: The study is based on data from the Norwegian Patient Registry. Relevant variables for all gynaecological hysterectomies in Norway in the period 2008-18 were collected at the individual level. Results: During the study period, 53 178 hysterectomies were registered in the Norwegian Patient Registry. The proportion of hysterectomies that were performed with minimally invasive techniques increased from 41 % to 73 % during the study period. Robot-assisted hysterectomies accounted for 15 % of the total in 2018. The number of concomitant salpingectomies also increased during the period, and were performed in more than half of all hysterectomies undertaken on a benign indication. Interpretation: Norwegian gynaecologists largely follow international guidelines and recommendations regarding minimally invasive hysterectomy and salpingectomy. Although the total proportion of minimally invasive hysterectomies is now relatively high, there are considerable variations between the different health trusts

Elective induction of labor: A prospective observational study

The aim of the present study was to assess indications for induction and describe the characteristics and delivery outcome in medical compared to non-medical/elective inductions. During a three-month period, 1663 term inductions were registered in 24 delivery units in Norway. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation at gestational age 37+0 and beyond. Indications, pre-induction Bishop scores, mode of delivery and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were registered, and compared between the medically indicated and elective induction groups. Ten percent of the inductions were elective, and the four most common indications were maternal request (35%), a previous negative delivery experience or difficult obstetric history (19%), maternal fatigue/tiredness (17%) and anxiety (15%). Nearly half of these inductions were performed at 39+0-40+6 weeks. There were fewer nulliparous women in the elective compared to the medically indicated induction group, 16% vs. 52% (p<0.05). The cesarean section rate in the elective induction group was 14% and 17% in the medically indicated group (14% vs. 17%, OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.3). We found that one in ten inductions in Norway is performed without a strict medical indication and 86% of these inductions resulted in vaginal delivery

Elective induction of labor: A prospective observational study

The aim of the present study was to assess indications for induction and describe the characteristics and delivery outcome in medical compared to non-medical/elective inductions. During a three-month period, 1663 term inductions were registered in 24 delivery units in Norway. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation at gestational age 37+0 and beyond. Indications, pre-induction Bishop scores, mode of delivery and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were registered, and compared between the medically indicated and elective induction groups. Ten percent of the inductions were elective, and the four most common indications were maternal request (35%), a previous negative delivery experience or difficult obstetric history (19%), maternal fatigue/tiredness (17%) and anxiety (15%). Nearly half of these inductions were performed at 39+0–40+6 weeks. There were fewer nulliparous women in the elective compared to the medically indicated induction group, 16% vs. 52% (p<0.05). The cesarean section rate in the elective induction group was 14% and 17% in the medically indicated group (14% vs. 17%, OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5–1.3). We found that one in ten inductions in Norway is performed without a strict medical indication and 86% of these inductions resulted in vaginal delivery