La reparación administrativa a la luz de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Tesis (Abogado) -- Universidad de Cartagena. Facultad de derecho y Ciencias Políticas, 2018Esta investigación permitió determinar que en el marco del sistema regional de protección de los derechos humanos, la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (en adelante la Corte IDH), ha fijado una serie de parámetros para valorar la convencionalidad de las reparaciones entregadas por el Estado a víctimas del conflicto armado en contextos de justicia transicional. Entre dichos criterios se encuentran los de objetividad, razonabilidad y efectividad, los cuales deben guiar los programas de reparaciones administrativas, implicando una cualificación de los mecanismos internos para garantizar los derechos de las víctimas. Por tanto, a pesar de que la Ley 1448 de 2011, hace referencias a los estándares del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, al punto de equiparar su contenido con el de las medidas de reparación que ordena la Corte IDH, existe un cumplimiento parcial de estos criterios en la normatividad, como se evidenciará en la indagación que se presenta, siendo de vital relevancia la reformulación de estos estándares en la normativa vigente para su correcta aplicación en los políticas públicas que las implemente

Patients awaiting surgery for neurosurgical diseases during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: a multicentre cohort study.

The large number of infected patients requiring mechanical ventilation has led to the postponement of scheduled neurosurgical procedures during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aims of this study were to investigate the factors that influence the decision to postpone scheduled neurosurgical procedures and to evaluate the effect of the restriction in scheduled surgery adopted to deal with the first outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain on the outcome of patients awaiting surgery. This was an observational retrospective study. A tertiary-level multicentre study of neurosurgery activity between 1 March and 30 June 2020. A total of 680 patients awaiting any scheduled neurosurgical procedure were enrolled. 470 patients (69.1%) were awaiting surgery because of spine degenerative disease, 86 patients (12.6%) due to functional disorders, 58 patients (8.5%) due to brain or spine tumours, 25 patients (3.7%) due to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) disorders and 17 patients (2.5%) due to cerebrovascular disease. The primary outcome was mortality due to any reason and any deterioration of the specific neurosurgical condition. Second, we analysed the rate of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. More than one-quarter of patients experienced clinical or radiological deterioration. The rate of worsening was higher among patients with functional (39.5%) or CSF disorders (40%). Two patients died (0.4%) during the waiting period, both because of a concurrent disease. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine independent covariates associated with maintaining the surgical indication. We found that community SARS-CoV-2 incidence (OR=1.011, p Patients awaiting neurosurgery experienced significant collateral damage even when they were considered for scheduled procedures