74 research outputs found

    Characterisation and categorisation of the diversity in viscoelastic vibrational properties between 98 wood types

    Get PDF
    International audienceContext Increased knowledge on diversity in wood properties would have implications both for fundamental research and for promoting a diversification of uses as material. *Aims The objective is to contribute to overcoming the critical lack of data on the diversity of wood dynamic mechanical/viscoelastic vibrational properties, by testing lesser-known species and categorizing sources of variability. *Methods Air-dry axial specific dynamic modulus of elasticity (E'/γ) and damping coefficient (tanή) were measured on a wide sampling (1792 specimens) of 98 wood types from 79 species. An experimental device and protocol was designed for conducting systematic (i.e. rapid and reproducible) characterizations. *Results Diversity at the specimens' level corroborates the "standard" relationship between tanή and E'/γ, which is discussed in terms of orientation of wood elements and of chemical composition. Diversity at the species level is expressed on the basis of results for normal heartwood, with specific gravity (γ) ranging from 0.2 to 1.3. Axial E'/γ ranges from 9 to 32 GPa and tanή from 4×10-3 to 19×10-3. Properties distribution follows a continuum, but with group characteristics. The lowest values of tanή are only found in certain tropical hardwoods. Results can also suggest alternative species for musical instruments making

    Data Work in a Knowledge-Broker Organization: How Cross-Organizational Data Maintenance shapes Human Data Interactions.

    Get PDF

    Participation in an Open Source Software Community.

    No full text
    International audienc

    Special issue : Perspectives on quality of collaboration in design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts. Volume 8, issue 4.

    No full text
    This special issue brings together recent research on collaboration in design situations, with a focus on analysing and evaluating the “quality of collaboration” in these situations. Although there is no consensus on a definition of collaboration, most researchers would agree that it involves sharing of goals, resources and representations relating to the joint activity of participants. Other important aspects relate to mutual respect, trust, responsibilities and accountability, within situational rules and norms. Moreover, the very notion of collaboration seems to presuppose a certain degree of equality between participants in terms of right to contribute (notwithstanding a more or less hierarchical situation), in the context of a socio-institutional mode of organisation that favours co-elaboration of ideas, knowledge objects or tangible artefacts. In task-oriented collective activities such as design, the question of the interplay between collaboration processes, task processes and their (various) outcomes is central, not least in order to try to understand what ways of working together favour most effective designs. This is a question that concerns the broad range of social actors involved in and concerned by design activity, across different professional and educational situations.The integrative concept of quality of collaboration has been proposed recently as a means for addressing this question. The term ‘quality’ here can be understood from different points of view: in descriptive terms (identifying and discriminating the intrinsic properties of collaboration), in a normative sense (identifying what makes ‘good’ or less good collaboration, considered sui generis as well as in relation to its outcomes), or a combination of both. Different perspectives on the collaborative process and experience can be considered and compared, from first-person perspectives (of collaboration participants, of their institutions, companies) to third-party analyses of the complex processes and outcomes associated to collaborative design activity. This special issue on the quality of collaboration in design situation comprises four contributions that represent various disciplinary approaches and research domains, in cognitive ergonomics and psychology (DĂ©tienne, Baker & Burkhardt, 2012), conversational analysis and ethnomethodology (Heinemann, Landgrebe & Matthews, 2012; Karlgren, 2012) and design methodology (Luke, 2012)

    Nouvelles directions de recherche en ergonomie des activités de conception : participation et qualité du produit dans les communautés en ligne épistémiques

    No full text
    International audienceCet article porte sur les communautĂ©s en ligne Ă  finalitĂ© de production de connaissances, ou communautĂ©s Ă©pistĂ©miques, telles que les communautĂ©s de conception de logiciels open source et les communautĂ©s Wikipedia. L’objectif de cet article est d’identifier et de dĂ©velopper plusieurs questions de recherche que ces nouvelles formes de collectifs posent Ă  l’ergonomie. AprĂšs un positionnement thĂ©orique sur ces collectifs vus comme des collectifs de conception, nous dĂ©velopperons trois lignes de questionnement centrĂ©es sur le processus et le produit de la conception. Une premiĂšre direction de questionnement porte sur les formes de participation dans ces communautĂ©s abordĂ©es sous l’angle de l’analyse de l’activitĂ©. Une deuxiĂšme direction concerne les mĂ©canismes de soutien socio-techniques Ă  la participation et notamment au maintien d’une conscience de la situation et d’une conscience sociale. Enfin nous traiterons plus particuliĂšrement de la question de la qualitĂ© du produit de la conception. Chaque thĂšme est abordĂ© en dressant un Ă©tat de l’art et en indiquant des pistes de recherche, certaines pluridisciplinaires
    • 

    corecore