Prognostic Value of Colonic Tissue and Blood Eosinophils in Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND It has been suggested that eosinophils may be a prognostic marker of disease outcome in ulcerative colitis (UC), but conflicting data exist. The objective was to investigate the extent of mucosal eosinophils and peripheral blood eosinophil count in newly diagnosed UC patients and to investigate its predictive value in short- and long-term disease outcomes. METHODS The degree of eosinophilia in baseline colonic biopsies and blood of newly diagnosed UC patients was retrospectively analyzed. It was investigated if tissue and blood eosinophilia could be a marker of a severe phenotype of UC, defined as the need for corticosteroids or immunomodulators in the first year or treatment with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies or colectomy during follow-up. Time to therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and time to colectomy were also evaluated as outcomes. RESULTS There were 103 UC patients (median age 26 years) included. Median tissue peak eosinophil count (PEC) was 70.0 and median peripheral blood eosinophil count was 0.3 × 109/L at diagnosis. Tissue PEC (r = -0.161, P = .104) and blood eosinophil count (r = 0.022, P = .877) were not correlated with the severity of histologic inflammation. Logistic regression analyses did not identify PEC and blood eosinophil count as predictors of more severe disease outcomes. Tissue PEC and peripheral blood eosinophil count did not predict the time the initiation of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies or colectomy. CONCLUSION Baseline tissue or peripheral blood eosinophils are not markers of disease activity and cannot be used as a predictor of severe disease outcomes in both adults and children with UC

The clinical relevance of an inflamed appendix in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS An appendectomy for appendiceal inflammation has been suggested to ameliorate the clinical course of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). In contrast, for Crohn's disease (CD) an inverse association has been suggested with a higher incidence of CD and worse prognosis after appendectomy. The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical relevance of an inflamed appendix in CD patients undergoing ileocoecal resection (ICR). METHODS All consecutive patients undergoing primary ICR between 2007 and 2018 were considered for inclusion. Microscopic data of available appendiceal resection specimens (n=99) were revised by a dedicated IBD-pathologist and scored as inflamed or not inflamed. Eighteen patients had a previous appendectomy. Pathological findings were correlated with disease characteristics and recurrence rates (clinical, endoscopic and intervention-related). RESULTS In total, 117 patients were included: 77 (65.8%) females with a median age of 30 years [IQR 24 - 43] with a median follow up of 102 months [IQR 76-114]. Of patients without previous appendectomy (n=99), 39% had an inflamed appendix. No significant differences in disease characteristics (e.g. disease location, behaviour, time to surgery) or prognosis could be demonstrated between the two groups. In contrast, previous appendectomy (n=18) was associated with penetrating disease and numerically shorter disease duration at the time of resection. Furthermore, a trend was seen towards a stronger association with postoperative recurrence. CONCLUSION The current study could not confirm a different prognosis for CD patients with and without an inflamed appendix. In contrast, in patients with a previous appendectomy a trend was seen towards increased postoperative recurrence, which might be related to the higher incidence of penetrating disease

Open-label extension of a phase 2 trial of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease

Background: Risankizumab, an anti-interleukin-23 antibody, was superior to placebo in achieving clinical and endoscopic remission at week 12 in a randomised, phase 2 induction study in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease. The efficacy and safety of extended intravenous induction and/or subcutaneous maintenance therapy with risankizumab was assessed. Methods: Following 12-week, double-blind, randomised, induction treatment comparing 200 mg or 600 mg intravenous risankizumab to placebo every 4 weeks, patients without deep remission, defined as clinical (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index <150) and endoscopic remission (Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity [CDEIS] ≤4 [≤2 for patients with isolated ileitis]), received open-label 600 mg intravenous risankizumab (every 4 weeks) and patients in deep remission underwent washout until week 26 (Period 2). At week 26, patients in clinical remission received maintenance treatment (Period 3) with 180 mg subcutaneous risankizumab (every 8 weeks). Efficacy endpoints included clinical and endoscopic response and remission at weeks 26 (Period 2) and 52 (Period 3) respectively; safety was assessed through both periods. Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02031276. Findings: In Period 2, 101 patients were treated with 600 mg risankizumab resulting in an increase in clinical remission rates at week 26 versus week 12 for all original designated treatment groups: 55% versus 18%, 59% versus 21%, and 47% versus 26% for placebo, 200, and 600 mg risankizumab, respectively. Of the 62 patients receiving maintenance treatment, 54 completed treatment. At week 52, clinical remission was maintained by 71% of patients; endoscopic remission and response (>50% CDEIS reduction from baseline) was achieved by 35% and 55% of patients, respectively, and 29% of patients achieved deep remission. Risankizumab was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Interpretation: Extended induction treatment with open-label intravenous risankizumab was effective in increasing clinical response and remission rates at week 26. Open-label subcutaneous risankizumab maintained remission till week 52 in most patients who were in clinical remission at week 26. Selective blockade of interleukin-23 warrants further evaluation as treatment for Crohn’s disease.Boehringer Ingelhei

A biomarker-stratified comparison of top-down versus accelerated step-up treatment strategies for patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease (PROFILE):a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial

Background: Management strategies and clinical outcomes vary substantially in patients newly diagnosed with Crohn's disease. We evaluated the use of a putative prognostic biomarker to guide therapy by assessing outcomes in patients randomised to either top-down (ie, early combined immunosuppression with infliximab and immunomodulator) or accelerated step-up (conventional) treatment strategies. Methods: PROFILE (PRedicting Outcomes For Crohn's disease using a moLecular biomarker) was a multicentre, open-label, biomarker-stratified, randomised controlled trial that enrolled adults with newly diagnosed active Crohn's disease (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥7, either elevated C-reactive protein or faecal calprotectin or both, and endoscopic evidence of active inflammation). Potential participants had blood drawn to be tested for a prognostic biomarker derived from T-cell transcriptional signatures (PredictSURE-IBD assay). Following testing, patients were randomly assigned, via a secure online platform, to top-down or accelerated step-up treatment stratified by biomarker subgroup (IBDhi or IBDlo), endoscopic inflammation (mild, moderate, or severe), and extent (colonic or other). Blinding to biomarker status was maintained throughout the trial. The primary endpoint was sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission to week 48. Remission was defined by a composite of symptoms and inflammatory markers at all visits. Flare required active symptoms (HBI ≥5) plus raised inflammatory markers (CRP &gt;upper limit of normal or faecal calprotectin ≥200 μg/g, or both), while remission was the converse—ie, quiescent symptoms (HBI &lt;5) or resolved inflammatory markers (both CRP ≤ the upper limit of normal and calprotectin &lt;200 μg/g) or both. Analyses were done in the full analysis (intention-to-treat) population. The trial has completed and is registered (ISRCTN11808228). Findings: Between Dec 29, 2017, and Jan 5, 2022, 386 patients (mean age 33·6 years [SD 13·2]; 179 [46%] female, 207 [54%] male) were randomised: 193 to the top-down group and 193 to the accelerated step-up group. Median time from diagnosis to trial enrolment was 12 days (range 0–191). Primary outcome data were available for 379 participants (189 in the top-down group; 190 in the accelerated step-up group). There was no biomarker–treatment interaction effect (absolute difference 1 percentage points, 95% CI –15 to 15; p=0·944). Sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission was significantly more frequent in the top-down group than in the accelerated step-up group (149 [79%] of 189 patients vs 29 [15%] of 190 patients, absolute difference 64 percentage points, 95% CI 57 to 72; p&lt;0·0001). There were fewer adverse events (including disease flares) and serious adverse events in the top-down group than in the accelerated step-up group (adverse events: 168 vs 315; serious adverse events: 15 vs 42), with fewer complications requiring abdominal surgery (one vs ten) and no difference in serious infections (three vs eight). Interpretation: Top-down treatment with combination infliximab plus immunomodulator achieved substantially better outcomes at 1 year than accelerated step-up treatment. The biomarker did not show clinical utility. Top-down treatment should be considered standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed active Crohn's disease. Funding: Wellcome and PredictImmune Ltd.</p

Intervju: akademik Jakša Barbić

Over the past 20 years evidence has accumulated confirming the immunomodulatory role of the appendix in ulcerative colitis (UC). This led to the idea that appendectomy might alter the clinical course of established UC. The objective of this body of research is to evaluate the short-term and medium-term efficacy of appendectomy to maintain remission in patients with UC, and to establish the acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to standard treatment. These paired phase III multicenter prospective randomised studies will include patients over 18 years of age with an established diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and a disease relapse within 12 months prior to randomisation. Patients need to have been medically treated until complete clinical (Mayo score <3) and endoscopic (Mayo score 0 or 1) remission. Patients will then be randomised 1:1 to a control group (maintenance 5-ASA treatment, no appendectomy) or elective laparoscopic appendectomy plus maintenance treatment. The primary outcome measure is the one year cumulative UC relapse rate - defined both clinically and endoscopically as a total Mayo-score ≥5 with endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3. Secondary outcomes that will be assessed include the number of relapses per patient at 12 months, the time to first relapse, health related quality of life and treatment costs, and number of colectomies in each arm. The ACCURE and ACCURE-UK trials will provide evidence on the role and acceptability of appendectomy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis and the effects of appendectomy on the disease course. NTR2883 ; ISRCTN5652301

Length of hospital stay and associated hospital costs with infliximab versus cyclosporine in severe ulcerative colitis

Cyclosporine and infliximab (IFX) seem equally effective as rescue therapy in hospitalized patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UC), although associated hospital stay and costs may differ. The aim of this study was to compare the duration of hospital stay and associated costs from initiation of rescue therapy to time of discharge in hospitalized patients with corticosteroid-refractory UC receiving cyclosporine or IFX. Colectomy rates after 6 months were used as the outcome parameter for treatment success. Hospital records of patients admitted between November 2003 and August 2012 at a tertiary referral center were analyzed. Forty-two patients were included (cyclosporine group: 26 patients; IFX group: 16 patients). Patient characteristics were comparable, with the exception that cyclosporine-treated patients more often had a pancolitis (89 vs. 63%, P=0.046). The median length of hospital stay was 11.0 (interquartile range 7.75-13.25) versus 4.0 days (interquartile range 4.0-5.75) in the cyclosporine and IFX group (P <0.01), respectively. The mean in-hospital costs were significantly higher in the cyclosporine-treated versus IFX-treated patients (6121 vs. 4853 euros, P <0.05), whereas the total costs up to 3 months after initiation of rescue therapy were significantly higher in the IFX group (6787 vs. 9983 euros, P <0.01). There were no significant differences in colectomy rates at 6 months (23 and 31% for cyclosporine and IFX, P=0.50). More side-effects were observed during treatment with cyclosporine. Length of hospital stay and in-hospital costs have been reduced significantly since the introduction of IFX as rescue therapy for severe UC instead of cyclosporine. However, the total treatment costs are higher in IFX-treated patient

Dried blood samples can support monitoring of infliximab concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A clinical validation

Aims: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can optimize the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Because of the delay between blood samples taken at trough and availability of results, dose adjustments can only be carried out at the next infusion, typically 8 weeks later. Dried blood samples (DBS) performed at home to measure IFX concentrations can reduce the time to adapt dose/dosing interval. Here, we aimed to validate the clinical application of DBS for IFX in IBD patients and to evaluate the feasibility of home sampling. Methods: DBS results from 40 IBD patients on IFX treatment were compared to serum sample results at trough, peak, and 3–5 weeks after IFX infusion. Subsequently, patients performed DBS home sampling one week before the next IFX infusion. These were compared to serum concentrations as predicted by Bayesian analysis. Results: IFX concentrations from finger prick and venous puncture correlate well. DBS IFX concentrations showed high correlation with serum IFX concentrations (Spearman correlation: ≥0.965), without bias. Passing-Bablok regression for IFX concentrations in DBS from home sampling also showed no bias (intercept: 1.02 mg L −1 (95% CI −1.77–2.04 mg L −1 ), slope: 0.82 (95% CI 0.63–1.40)), with reasonable correlation (Spearman correlation: 0.671). Conclusions: Timely adjustment of IFX dose/dosing interval can be facilitated by IFX concentration measurement in home-sampled DBS. DBS is a reliable method to measure IFX and can be used to predict IFX trough concentrations

Health-related quality of life and disability in patients with ulcerative colitis and proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch versus treatment with anti-TNF agents

We compared health-related quality of life (HRQL) and disability in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in remission with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents (TNF) or after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Two patient cohorts were studied. The first group consisted of patients in remission after RPC with IPAA (surgery group). The second group consisted of patients in remission with infliximab or adalimumab (medical group). For inclusion in the surgery group the pouch had to be functional for ≥1year and patients were excluded in case of postoperative complications. In the medical group, patients had to be on maintenance therapy with anti-TNF agents for ≥1year and in clinical remission. HRQL and disability outcomes were assessed using SF-36, COREFO, WPAI:UC and EORTC questionnaires. 60 patients were included, 30 patients in both groups. 58 out of 60 patients (97%) returned the completed questionnaires: 29 patients in the surgery group (median age 42 years [22-67]; 48% female) and 29 patients in the medical group (median age 45 years [19-68]; 65% female). Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in SF-36, WPAI:UC and EORTC questionnaires between both groups, except for the medication and stool frequency scale (COREFO questionnaire) that was significantly higher in the surgery vs. the medical group (p=0.004 and p <0.001, respectively). HRQL and disability were not different among the medical and surgical group, except for stool frequency and anti-diarrhea medication use that was significantly higher in surgically treated patient

Intestinal Ultrasound in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Promising, but Work in Progress

Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly used and promulgated as a noninvasive monitoring tool for children with inflammatory bowel disease because other diagnostic modalities such as colonoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging cause significant stress in the pediatric population. The most important parameters of inflammation that can be assessed using IUS are bowel wall thickness and hyperemia of the bowel wall. Research has shown that IUS has the potential to be a valuable additional point-of-care tool to guide treatment choice and to monitor and predict treatment response, although evidence of its accuracy and value in clinical practice is still limited. This review gives an update and overview of the current evidence on the use and accuracy of IUS in children with inflammatory bowel disease