Early liver transplantation for severe alcohol-related hepatitis not responding to medical treatment: a prospective controlled study

peer reviewedBackground: Early liver transplantation for severe alcohol-related hepatitis is an emerging treatment option. We aimed to assess the risk of alcohol relapse 2 years after early liver transplantation for alcohol-related hepatitis compared with liver transplantation for alcohol-related cirrhosis after at least 6 months of abstinence. Methods: We conducted a multicentre, non-randomised, non-inferiority, controlled study in 19 French and Belgian hospitals. All participants were aged 18 years or older. There were three groups of patients recruited prospectively: patients with severe alcohol-related hepatitis who did not respond to medical treatment and were eligible for early liver transplantation according to a new selection scoring system based on social and addiction items that can be quantified in points (early transplantation group); patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis listed for liver transplantation after at least 6 months of abstinence (standard transplantation group); patients with severe alcohol-related hepatitis not responding to medical treatment not eligible for early liver transplantation according to the selection score (not eligible for early transplantation group), this group did not enter any further liver transplantation processes. We also defined a historical control group of patients with severe alcohol-related hepatitis unresponsive to medical therapy and non-transplanted. The primary outcome was the non-inferiority of 2-year rate of alcohol relapse after transplantation in the early transplantation group compared with the standard transplantation group using the alcohol timeline follow back (TLFB) method and a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 10%. Secondary outcomes were the pattern of alcohol relapse, 2-year survival rate post-transplant in the early transplantation group compared with the standard transplantation group, and 2-year overall survival in the early transplantation group compared with patients in the not eligible for early transplantation group and historical controls. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01756794. Findings: Between Dec 5, 2012, and June 30, 2016, we included 149 patients with severe alcohol-related hepatitis: 102 in the early transplantation group and 47 in the not eligible for early transplantation group. 129 patients were included in the standard transplantation group. 68 patients in the early transplantation group and 93 patients in the standard transplantation group received a liver transplant. 23 (34%) patients relapsed in the early transplantation group, and 23 (25%) patients relapsed in the standard transplantation group; therefore, the non-inferiority of early transplantation versus standard transplantation was not demonstrated (absolute difference 9·1% [95% CI –∞ to 21·1]; p=0·45). The 2-year rate of high alcohol intake was greater in the early transplantation group than the standard transplantation group (absolute difference 16·7% [95% CI 5·8–27·6]) The time spent drinking alcohol was not different between the two groups (standardised difference 0·24 [95% CI −0·07 to 0·55]), but the time spent drinking a large quantity of alcohol was higher in the early transplantation group than the standard transplantation group (standardised difference 0·50 [95% CI 0·17–0·82]). 2-year post-transplant survival was similar between the early transplantation group and the standard transplantation group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·87 [95% CI 0·33–2·26]); 2-year overall survival was higher in the early transplantation group than the not eligible for early transplantation group and historical controls (HR 0·27 [95% CI 0·16–0·47] and 0·21 [0·13–0·32]). Interpretation: We cannot conclude non-inferiority in terms of rate of alcohol relapse post-transplant between early liver transplantation and standard transplantation. High alcohol intake is more frequent after early liver transplantation. This prospective controlled study confirms the important survival benefit related to early liver transplantation for severe alcohol-related hepatitis; and this study provides objective data on survival and alcohol relapse to tailor the management of patients with severe alcohol-related hepatitis. Funding: The present study has been granted by the French Ministry of Health—Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 2010

Systematic Review: antiviral therapy of recurrent hepatitis C post liver transplant

International audienceBackground Hepatitis C viral infection is the first cause of liver transplantation worldwide. Recurrence of infection is constant and compromises patient and graft survival. Aim To provide an updated review of the main treatments of recurrent HCV. Methods MEDLINE (1990 to August 2010) and national meeting abstract search. Search terms included hepatitis C, liver transplantation, treatment. An emphasis was placed on randomized trials. Results Antiviral therapy based on pegylated interferon and ribavirin must be considered before liver transplantation but is poorly tolerated and has poor results in patients with cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. Antiviral therapy can be administrated systematically early after liver transplantation, or in patients with established recurrent chronic hepatitis. Combination of pegylated interferon alfa plus ribavirin results in a sustained virological response of up to 30% in patients. Small trial of polyclonal anti-HCV to prevent recurrence were disappointing. Perspective Currently available antiviral therapy is effective in a minority of transplanted patients infected with HCV. Specifically targeted antiviral therapies combining interferon alfa and ribavirin or a combination of antiprotease and antipolymerase components associated with a genetic prediction of antiviral response and blocking HCV cell entry should improve the long-term prognosis of recurrent hepatitis C in the near future

Carcinogenèse hépatique et virus de l’hépatite C

Le rôle du virus de l’hépatite C dans la survenue du carcinome hépatocellulaire est évident d’un point de vue épidémiologique, mais les mécanismes de cette carcinogenèse restent obscurs. Lors de l’infection par ce virus, le carcinome hépatocellulaire ne survient que rarement en l’absence de cirrhose et pratiquement jamais sur un foie normal. Contrairement à celui du virus de l’hépatite B, le pouvoir oncogénique du VHC semble plus limité. Néanmoins, de nombreuses interactions entre les protéines virales et cellulaires ont été décrites et pourraient être impliquées à la fois dans la carcinogenèse et dans la persistance virale. Les modèles de souris transgéniques et les approches récentes utilisant le transcriptome et le protéome pourraient aider à la compréhension de ce cancer fréquent et difficile à traiter

Matching Graft Quality to Recipient’s Disease Severity Based on the Survival Benefit in Liver Transplantation

International audiencePersistent shortage and heterogeneous quality of liver grafts encourages the optimization of donor-recipient matching in liver transplantation (LT). We explored whether or not there was a survival benefit (SB) of LT according to the quality of grafts assessed by the Donor Quality Index (DQI) and recipients' disease severity, using the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) in 8387 French patients wait-listed between 2009 and 2014. SB associated with LT was estimated using the sequential stratification method in different categories of MELD and DQI. For each transplantation, a stratum was created that matched one transplanted patient with all eligible control candidates. Strata were thereafter combined, and a stratified Cox model, adjusted for covariates, was fitted in order to estimate hazard ratios that qualified the SB according to each MELD and DQI sub-group. A significant SB was observed for all MELD and DQI sub-groups, with the exception of high MELD patients transplanted with "high-risk" grafts. More specifically, in decompensated-cirrhosis patients, "high-risk" grafts did not appear to be detrimental in medium MELD patients. Interestingly, in hepatocellular-carcinoma (HCC) patients, a significant SB was found for all MELD-DQI combinations. For MELD exceptions no SB was found. In terms of SB, "low-risk" grafts appeared appropriate for most severe patients (MELD > 30). Conversely, low/medium MELD and HCC patients presented an SB while allocated "high-risk" grafts. Thus, SB based matching rules for LT candidates might improve the survival of the LT population as a whole

Author Correction: A Donor Quality Index for liver transplantation: development, internal and external validation

A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper

Hepatitis B virus replicating in hepatocellular carcinoma encodes HBx variants with preserved ability to antagonize restriction by Smc5/6

International audienceHepatitis B virus infection is a major cause of liver diseases including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The viral regulatory protein HBx is essential for viral replication and has been involved in the development of HCC. Recently, we characterized a subset of HCCs that replicate HBV. Our aim was to characterize HBx encoded by the full-length HBV DNA (cccDNA) in HCC and non-HCC liver. HBx genes were amplified and sequenced from eight paired HCC and non-HCC tissues in which HBV cccDNA and pgRNA were both present. Sequence analyses identified twelve amino acid positions mutated between HCC and non-HCC liver, and detected in at least three cases. We next assessed the impact of these mutations on HBx function by testing their transcriptional activity. We examined their ability to rescue the transcription of HBV virus deficient for HBx in differentiated HepaRG cells and to induce Smc5/6 degradation, which is mandatory for viral replication. We assessed their capacity to activate a CREB-dependent reporter. Finally we analyzed their growth suppressive activity using colony formation assays. Our results showed that most HBx variants isolated from HCC retain their ability to support HBV cccDNA transcription and to degrade Smc5/6. Strikingly, HCC specific HBx variants are impaired in their antiproliferative activity, which may be detrimental for tumor growth. In conclusion, in contrast to previous observations that tumor HBx variants lack transcriptional activity, we showed here that HBx variants have retained their ability to counteract Smc5/6 and thus to activate cccDNA transcription although they tend to lose antiproliferative activity