1,291 research outputs found
1991 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, one instance of a status offender held in secure detention was recorded in 1991, as compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of 1976. 65 separation violations were recorded in 1991, representing a 92% reduction from the 1976 baseline and 48% from 1990. 81 jail removal violations occurred, representing a 90% reduction from the 1980 baseline and an 18% reduction from 1990.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. De Minimis Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Numerical /
H. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. Common Offense Acronyms and 1991 Violations by Offense Type and Locatio
FY 1997 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, 1 instance of a status offender held in secure detention was recorded in FY 1997, compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of CY 1976. 2 separation violations were recorded in FY 1997, representing a 99.8% reduction from the CY 1976 baseline of 824 violations. 68 jail removal violations were projected (52 actual), representing an 92% reduction from the CY 1980 baseline. Originally completed December 1997; revised July 1999.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. Full Compliance Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. Fiscal Year 1997 Violations by Offense Type and Location /
III. Common Offense Acronym
Disproportionate Detention of Minorities: A Case Study of One State's Compliance with the Mandates of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act
Pursuant to Section 223(a)(23) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, states must examine whether minority youth are disproportionately detained in relation to their proportion in the general population. For a preliminary assessment of Alaska’s compliance, five and a half years of detention data (1990–June 1995) for the state of Alaska are analyzed to assess the detention of minority and non-minority youth. A number of factors are used to compare racial groups: type of offense, prior record, gender, age, length of detention, etc.This study was made possible by a gift from Cook Inlet Region, Inc. and was conducted in collaboration with the Alaska Division of Family and Youth Services.Abstract /
[Introduction] /
Background /
Background of the Study /
Findings /
Discussion /
References /
Appendix 1. Repeat Offender
1992 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, one instance of a status offender held in secure detention was recorded in 1992, as compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of 1976. 11 separation violations were recorded in 1992, representing a 99% reduction from the 1976 baseline and 83% from 1992. 44 jail removal violations occurred, representing a 95% reduction from the 1980 baseline and an 46% reduction from 1992.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. De Minimis Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Numerical /
H. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. Common Offense Acronyms and 1992 Violations by Offense Type and Locatio
FY 1995 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, 13 instances of a status offender held in secure detention were recorded in FY 1995, compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of CY 1976. 11 separation violations were recorded and 23 projected in FY 1995, representing a 97.3% reduction from the CY 1976 baseline of 824 violations. 143 jail removal violations were projected, representing an 83% reduction from the CY 1980 baseline. Originally completed Feb 1996; revised June 1996.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. De Minimis Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Numerical /
H. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. FY95 Violations by Offense Type and Location /
III. Common Offense Acronym
A Preliminary Examination of Minority Referrals to the Alaska Juvenile Justice System
This paper is a based on the report Disproportionate Representation of Minorities in the Alaska Juvenile Justice System: Phase I Report by N.E. Schafer, Richard W. Curtis, and Cassie Atwell (Anchorage, AK: Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage, Sep 1997).The disproportionate processing of minorities in the justice system has been noted with growing concern nationally as well as at the state level. In Alaska, as in other states, the primary basis for concern is that minorities are overrepresented among the adult prison population. The realization that this disproportionality appears in other justice system venues has led nationally to a number of research initiatives with a focus on the overrepresentation of juveniles. This paper analyzes referral data from the Alaska Division of Family and Youth Services (DFYS) for 1992–1995 to provide a statistical overview of disproportionate minority contact in the Alaska juvenile justice system, providing comparative data for referrals of Alaska Native, African American, and white youth.This study was made possible by a gift from Cook Inlet Region, Inc. and was conducted in collaboration with the Alaska Division of Family and Youth Services.[Introduction]
Disproportionality Literature /
Research Methodology /
Referral Events /
Referral Outcomes /
Analysis of Individuals /
Summary and Conclusion /
Bibliography /
APPENDICES /
A: Referrals and Referral Distribution /
B. Factors Significantly Associated with Intake Decisions /
C. Logistic Regression Finding
FY 1996 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, 4 instances of a status offender held in secure detention were recorded in FY 1996, compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of CY 1976. 3 separation violations were recorded in FY 1997, representing a 99.6% reduction from the CY 1976 baseline of 824 violations. 44 jail removal violations were projected, representing an 95% reduction from the CY 1980 baseline.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. De Minimis Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. FY96 Violations by Offense Type and Location /
III. Common Offense Acronym
1993 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, no instances of a status offender held in secure detention was recorded in 1993, as compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of 1976. 16 separation violations were recorded in 1992, representing a 98% reduction from the 1976 baseline of 824 violations. 59 jail removal violations were projected, representing a 94% reduction from the 1980 baseline and an 25% increase from 1992.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. De Minimis Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Numerical /
H. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. 1993 Violations by Offense Type and Location /
III. Common Offense Acronym
FY 2000 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, 2 instances of status offenders held in secure detention were recorded in FY 2000, compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of CY 1976. In Alaska, 17 separation violations were recorded in FY 2000 (45 projected), representing a 98% reduction from the CY 1976 baseline of 824 violations. 82 jail removal violations were projected (50 actual), representing an substantial reduction from the CY 1980 baseline.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Juvenile JusticeA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. De Minimis Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. Fiscal Year 2000 Violations by Offense Type and Location /
III. Common Offense Acronym
Mapping Sex Offender Addresses: The Utility of the Alaska Sex Offender Registry as a Research Data Base
The registration of sex offenders was part of a national effort to enhance public safety by permitting law enforcement officials to track the location of convicted sex offenders after their release. All fifty states have enacted legislation requiring persons convicted of various sex-related offenses to register with law enforcement agencies; many states also grant public access to all or a portion of their registries. This document reports on the Alaska Statistical Analysis Center's efforts to improve data accuracy in the Alaska Sex Offender Registry, maintained by the Alaska State Troopers, and to assess the registry's utility as a research tool.Bureau of Justice Statistics, Grant No. 1999-RU-RX-K006Background of the Project /
Research Methodology /
Results /
Utility: Spatial Justice Research /
APPENDICES /
A. Alaska’s Sex Offender Registration Law /
B. Establishment of a Central Registry of Sex Offenders in Alaska /
C. Definitions of Offenses for which Convicted Persons Must Register as Sex Offenders in Alask
- …