Comparative evaluation of three clinical decision support systems: prospective screening for medication errors in 100 medical inpatients

Purpose: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are promoted as powerful screening tools to improve pharmacotherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential contribution of CDSS to patient management in clinical practice. Methods: We prospectively analyzed the pharmacotherapy of 100 medical inpatients through the parallel use of three CDSS, namely, Pharmavista, DrugReax, and TheraOpt. After expert discussion that also considered all patient-specific clinical information, we selected apparently relevant alerts, issued suitable recommendations to physicians, and recorded subsequent prescription changes. Results: For 100 patients with a median of eight concomitant drugs, Pharmavista, DrugReax, and TheraOpt generated a total of 53, 362, and 328 interaction alerts, respectively. Among those we identified and forwarded 33 clinically relevant alerts to the attending physician, resulting in 19 prescription changes. Four adverse drug events were associated with interactions. The proportion of clinically relevant alerts among all alerts (positive predictive value) was 5.7, 8.0, and 7.6%, and the sensitivity to detect all 33 relevant alerts was 9.1, 87.9, and 75.8% for Pharmavista, DrugReax and TheraOpt, respectively. TheraOpt recommended 31 dose adjustments, of which we considered 11 to be relevant; three of these were followed by dose reductions. Conclusions: CDSS are valuable screening tools for medication errors, but only a small fraction of their alerts appear relevant in individual patients. In order to avoid overalerting CDSS should use patient-specific information and management-oriented classifications. Comprehensive information should be displayed on-demand, whereas a limited number of computer-triggered alerts that have management implications in the majority of affected patients should be based on locally customized and supported algorithm

Low allopurinol doses are sufficient to optimize azathioprine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients with inadequate thiopurine metabolite concentrations

Purpose: Recent studies in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) on thiopurine therapy suggest that too low 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations (6-TGN) and too high methylmercaptopurine nucleotide concentrations (MMPN) can be reversed by a combination therapy of allopurinol and low-dose thiopurines. To date, however, optimal dosing has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimal allopurinol doses necessary to achieve adequate 6-TGN concentrations in combination with low-dose azathioprine. Methods: A stepwise dose-escalation of allopurinol was performed in 11 azathioprine-pretreated IBD patients with inadequately low 6-TGN concentrations (5,000pmol/8 × 108 erythrocytes) and/or elevated liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase levels one- to threefold the upper limit of normal). Six patients were recruited into an open study, and five were treated in the context of an individualized therapeutic approach. Adverse effects, azathioprine metabolites, liver enzymes and whole blood counts were monitored two to three times per month. Results: Adequate 6-TGN concentrations were achieved with a combination of 25mg allopurinol and 50mg azathioprine in one patient and with 50mg allopurinol and 50mg azathioprine in nine patients. Median 6-TGN concentrations (range) were 336 (290-488) pmol/8 × 108 erythrocytes after an 8-week-long intake of the final dose combination. One patient dropped out due to nausea after the first intake. MMPN concentrations and liver enzymes normalized immediately in all affected patients. All patients finishing the dose-escalation regimen tolerated the treatment without toxicity. Conclusions: Combination therapy with only 50mg allopurinol and 50mg azathioprine daily is sufficient, efficacious and safe in most IBD patients with inadequate thiopurine metabolite concentrations to optimize azathioprine-based IBD therap

Thrombozytenaggregationshemmer: Was sind die Risiken?

The most common risks related to platelet inhibitor therapy are bleeding, drug-drug interactions and therapeutic failure. The new substances prasugrel and ticagrelor are more potent platelet inhibitiors than clopidogrel. This reduces the incidence of ischemic events, but also potentially increases the bleeding risk. Clopidogrel therapy has up to 20% non-response rates, which can partially be explained by genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions. Currently no evidence exists that ticagrelor or prasugrel efficacy is affected by genetic polymorphisms. The therapy in patients at risk still has to be carefully adapted to minimize adverse events. Patients older than 75 years and/or weighing less than 60 kg should receive a reduced dose of prasugrel. The combination of ticagrelor with strong cytochrome-P450-3A4 inhibitors is contraindicated

Risks of inflammatory bowel disease treatment with glucocorticosteroids and aminosalicylates

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticosteroids and aminosalicylates, mainly mesalazine (5-ASA), are both standard therapeutics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The glucocorticosteroids are highly effective in inducing remission in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, but their use is limited by the high incidence and the potentially serious nature of adverse events. In an attempt to limit systemic side effects, rapidly metabolized corticosteroids such as budesonide have been introduced. The safety profile of aminosalicylates differs between the formulations. METHODS: We summarize the potential risks associated with glucocorticosteroid and aminosalicylate therapy in IBDs. RESULTS: The numerous adverse events of glucocorticosteroids, particularly at high doses and prolonged treatment, include opportunistic infections, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ocular effects (glaucoma and cataracts), psychiatric complications, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression and increased fracture risk. Partially, these systemic adverse events occur with budesonide, which only has a low systemic exposure. The safety profile of 5-ASA is comparable to placebo and superior to the old aminosalicylate prodrug sulfasalazine, which had a significantly higher incidence of intolerance reactions including allergic rashes. Only in rare cases has nephrotoxicity such as interstitial nephritis been associated with 5-ASA. CONCLUSION: Considering the toxicity profile of conventional glucocorticosteroids, one primary goal of treatment in IBD should be corticosteroid-free remission. Therapy with budesonide may result in a better safety profile. 5-ASA treatment is usually well tolerated, but with regard to the rare nephrotoxic events, it is advisable to assess renal function before and during treatment with 5-ASA

Analysis of drug-drug interactions in Swiss claims data using tizanidine and ciprofloxacin as a prototypical contraindicated combination

BACKGROUND: Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) are described in various case reports, but few studies have evaluated the impact of specific combinations on a population level. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the type and frequency of multiple contraindicated (X-pDDIs) and major interactions (D-pDDIs) and to subsequently assess the impact of the particular combination of tizanidine and ciprofloxacin on outpatient physician visits and hospitalizations. METHODS: Anonymized Swiss claims data from 524 797 patients in 2014-2015 were analyzed. First, frequencies of X- and D-pDDIs were calculated. Next, a retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients prescribed tizanidine and ciprofloxacin (exposed, n = 199) or tizanidine and other antibiotics (unexposed, n = 960). Hospitalizations and outpatient physician visits within 7, 14, and 30 days after initiation of antibiotic therapy were evaluated using multiple binary logistic regression and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: The relative frequencies of X- and D-pDDIs were 0.4% and 6.65%, respectively. In the cohort study, significant associations between exposure to tizanidine and ciprofloxacin and outpatient physician visits were identified for 14 and 30 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.61 [95% CI = 1.17-2.24], P = 0.004, and OR = 1.59 [95% CI = 1.1-2.34], P = 0.016). A trend for increased risk of hospitalization was found for all evaluated time periods (OR = 1.68 [95% CI = 0.84-3.17], OR = 1.52 [95% CI = 0.63-3.33], and OR = 2.19 [95% CI = 0.88-5.02]). CONCLUSION and RELEVANCE: The interaction between tizanidine and ciprofloxacin is not only relevant for individual patients, but also at the population level. Further investigation of the impact of other clinically relevant DDIs is necessary to improve patient safety and reduce avoidable health care utilization

Prediction of health care expenditure increase: how does pharmacotherapy contribute?

Background Rising health care costs are a major public health issue. Thus, accurately predicting future costs and understanding which factors contribute to increases in health care expenditures are important. The objective of this project was to predict patients healthcare costs development in the subsequent year and to identify factors contributing to this prediction, with a particular focus on the role of pharmacotherapy. Methods We used 2014–2015 Swiss health insurance claims data on 373′264 adult patients to classify individuals’ changes in health care costs. We performed extensive feature generation and developed predictive models using logistic regression, boosted decision trees and neural networks. Based on the decision tree model, we performed a detailed feature importance analysis and subgroup analysis, with an emphasis on drug classes. Results The boosted decision tree model achieved an overall accuracy of 67.6% and an area under the curve-score of 0.74; the neural network and logistic regression models performed 0.4 and 1.9% worse, respectively. Feature engineering played a key role in capturing temporal patterns in the data. The number of features was reduced from 747 to 36 with only a 0.5% loss in the accuracy. In addition to hospitalisation and outpatient physician visits, 6 drug classes and the mode of drug administration were among the most important features. Patient subgroups with a high probability of increase (up to 88%) and decrease (up to 92%) were identified. Conclusions Pharmacotherapy provides important information for predicting cost increases in the total population. Moreover, its relative importance increases in combination with other features, including health care utilisation

Low allopurinol doses are sufficient to optimize azathioprine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients with inadequate thiopurine metabolite concentrations

PURPOSE: Recent studies in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) on thiopurine therapy suggest that too low 6-thioguanine nucleotide concentrations (6-TGN) and too high methylmercaptopurine nucleotide concentrations (MMPN) can be reversed by a combination therapy of allopurinol and low-dose thiopurines. To date, however, optimal dosing has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimal allopurinol doses necessary to achieve adequate 6-TGN concentrations in combination with low-dose azathioprine. METHODS: A stepwise dose-escalation of allopurinol was performed in 11 azathioprine-pretreated IBD patients with inadequately low 6-TGN concentrations (5,000 pmol/8 × 10(8) erythrocytes) and/or elevated liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase levels one- to threefold the upper limit of normal). Six patients were recruited into an open study, and five were treated in the context of an individualized therapeutic approach. Adverse effects, azathioprine metabolites, liver enzymes and whole blood counts were monitored two to three times per month. RESULTS: Adequate 6-TGN concentrations were achieved with a combination of 25 mg allopurinol and 50 mg azathioprine in one patient and with 50 mg allopurinol and 50 mg azathioprine in nine patients. Median 6-TGN concentrations (range) were 336 (290-488) pmol/8 × 10(8) erythrocytes after an 8-week-long intake of the final dose combination. One patient dropped out due to nausea after the first intake. MMPN concentrations and liver enzymes normalized immediately in all affected patients. All patients finishing the dose-escalation regimen tolerated the treatment without toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with only 50 mg allopurinol and 50 mg azathioprine daily is sufficient, efficacious and safe in most IBD patients with inadequate thiopurine metabolite concentrations to optimize azathioprine-based IBD therapy

Factors associated with acute-phase response of bisphosphonate-naïve or pretreated women with osteoporosis receiving an intravenous first dose of zoledronate or ibandronate.

A first intravenous dose of bisphosphonates may be associated with an acute-phase response (APR). In bisphosphonate-naïve women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, the characteristics and frequency of APR may differ by compound. Prior bisphosphonate exposure was predictive of APR risk and severity. INTRODUCTION Intravenous (IV) administration of bisphosphonates (BP), such as zoledronate (ZOL) and ibandronate (IBN), may be associated with an APR. The characteristics of APR may differ by compound. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the characteristics of APR (rates, signs and symptoms, severity), in the absence of any preventive measure, after a first IV application of ZOL or IBN in patients naïve or previously exposed to BP in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS This is an open-label prospective exploratory study with two cohorts of consecutive postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with either IV ZOL or IBN at the Department of Osteoporosis of the University Hospital of Berne, Switzerland. RESULTS Intravenous BP was administered to 725 women (411 ZOL and 314 IBN). Prior oral or IV BP use was less frequent in the ZOL group (61.8 vs. 71.7%, p = 0.005). In total, 301 women (41.5%) reported the presence of one or more signs or symptoms of APR with rates for ZOL and IBN of 47.7 and 33.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). Corresponding APR rates in the subgroup of BP-naïve patients were 55.6 and 32.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). The leading APR clinical sign was the presence of post-dose myalgia or arthralgia (68.1%). Prior BP exposure was predictive of both APR risk and severity, and lower serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were possibly predictive of severity. CONCLUSIONS In a real-world setting, APR rates with ZOL and IBN may be higher than reported in randomised controlled trials and may differ by compound, prior BP exposure, and serum 25(OH)D levels

Analysis of Drug-Drug Interactions in Swiss Claims Data Using Tizanidine and Ciprofloxacin as a Prototypical Contraindicated Combination

Background: Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) are described in various case reports, but few studies have evaluated the impact of specific combinations on a population level. Objective: To analyze the type and frequency of multiple contraindicated (X-pDDIs) and major interactions (D-pDDIs) and to subsequently assess the impact of the particular combination of tizanidine and ciprofloxacin on outpatient physician visits and hospitalizations. Methods: Anonymized Swiss claims data from 524 797 patients in 2014-2015 were analyzed. First, frequencies of X- and D-pDDIs were calculated. Next, a retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients prescribed tizanidine and ciprofloxacin (exposed, n = 199) or tizanidine and other antibiotics (unexposed, n = 960). Hospitalizations and outpatient physician visits within 7, 14, and 30 days after initiation of antibiotic therapy were evaluated using multiple binary logistic regression and multiple linear regression. Results: The relative frequencies of X- and D-pDDIs were 0.4% and 6.65%, respectively. In the cohort study, significant associations between exposure to tizanidine and ciprofloxacin and outpatient physician visits were identified for 14 and 30 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.61 [95% CI = 1.17-2.24], P = 0.004, and OR = 1.59 [95% CI = 1.1-2.34], P = 0.016). A trend for increased risk of hospitalization was found for all evaluated time periods (OR = 1.68 [95% CI = 0.84-3.17], OR = 1.52 [95% CI = 0.63-3.33], and OR = 2.19 [95% CI = 0.88-5.02]). Conclusion and Relevance: The interaction between tizanidine and ciprofloxacin is not only relevant for individual patients, but also at the population level. Further investigation of the impact of other clinically relevant DDIs is necessary to improve patient safety and reduce avoidable health care utilization.ISSN:1060-0280ISSN:1542-627