Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-based therapy in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome: Current data and everyday practice

  Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an evidence-based diagnostic tool of physiological significance of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Due to microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), information obtained from FFR assessment could be less reliable and, thus, its clinical role remains controversial. Indeed, results of currently published studies are essentially discrepant. Only a few randomized clinical trials have been performed showing the efficacy of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in ACS. Consequently, its role in acute scenarios remains substantially understudied. Herein, is presented the current state of knowledge re­garding FFR use in ACS setting. (Cardiol J 2017; 24, 4: 426–435

Critical evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of azilsartan

Appropriate control of blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients still represents the major therapeutic goal in the treatment of hypertension. Despite the growing attention and wide range of antihypertensive agents available in the clinical scenario, the target of BP below the advised thresholds of 140/90 mmHg is, unfortunately, often unreached. For this reason, the search for new antihypertensive agents is still ongoing. Azilsartan medoxomil, a new angiotensin receptor blocker that has been recently introduced in the clinical arena, represents the eighth angiotensin receptor blocker currently available for BP control. The aim of this paper is to describe the efficacy and safety profile of this new compound, reviewing available data obtained from both pre-clinical and clinical studies

Elevated high-sensitivity troponin does not indicate the presence of coronary artery disease in patients presenting with supraventricular tachycardia

Background: Patients with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) often present with similar symptoms (chest pain, shortness of breath), similar electrocar¬diographic changes and elevated high-sensitivity troponin (Tn). It is not clear whether troponin reflects critical CAD or is elevated due to other causes in patients presenting with SVT. The aim of this study was to assess the role of elevated troponin in patients presenting with SVT. Methods: Patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for SVT and simultaneous coronary an¬giography at the Heart Centre Lucerne, Switzerland between January 2010 and October 2014 were in¬cluded in this analysis. Significant CAD was defined as diameter-stenosis ≥ 75% in vessels > 2.0 mm. The level of Tn was compared between patients with the presence or absence of CAD on coronary angi¬ography. A Tn value of ≥ 0.014 μg/L was considered as elevated. Results: During the study period a total of 473 patients underwent RFA for SVT. The study population consisted of 326 patients (69%, mean age 60 ± 12 years) who underwent invasive coronary angiogra¬phy during the same session. The prevalence of significant CAD was 14% (45/326 patients). The highest prevalence of CAD was found in patients with atrial flutter (35%, 18/45 patients). Tn was elevated in 83% (10/12 patients) with significant CAD and in 47% (26/55 patients) without CAD. Conclusions: The prevalence of CAD is low in patients with SVT, which questions the role of routine invasive coronary angiography during RFA. Tn measurement did not reliably exclude or confirm CAD in these patients

Optical coherence tomography findings in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds thrombosis

Background—Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds have been developed to improve late outcomes after coronary interventions. However, recent registries raised concerns regarding an increased incidence of scaffold thrombosis (ScT). The mechanism of ScT remains unknown.Methods and Results—The present study investigated angiographic and optical coherence tomography findings in patients experiencing ScT. Fifteen ScT (14 patients, 79% male, age 59±10 years) occurred at a median of 16 days (25%–75% interquartile range: 1–263 days) after implantation. Early ScT (1 month) and very late (>1 year) ScT (respectively, 5 and 2 cases), 5 scaffolds showed intimal neovessels or marked peristrut low-intensity areas. Scaffold fractures were additionally found in 2 patients, and scaffold collapse was found in 1 patient with very late ScT. Extensive strut malapposition was the presumed cause for ScT in 1 case. One scaffold did not show any morphological abnormality. Thrombectomy specimens were analyzed in 3 patients and did not demonstrate increased numbers of inflammatory cells.Conclusions—The mechanisms of early ScT seem to be similar to metallic stents (mechanical and inadequate antiplatelet therapy). The predominant finding in late and very late ScT is peristrut low-intensity area

Evaluation of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients undergoing pacemaker implantation.

BACKGROUND This study evaluated the use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older patients undergoing pacemaker implantation. METHODS In this prospective cohort, CGA was performed in 197 patients ≥75 years at pacemaker implantation and yearly thereafter. CGA embraced the following domains: cognition, mobility, nutrition, activities of daily living (ADLs), and falls (with or without loss of consciousness). Based on comorbidities, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was calculated. For predictive analysis, logistic regression was used. RESULTS During a mean follow-up duration of 2.4 years, the incidence rates of syncope decreased from 0.46 to 0.04 events per year (p < 0.001), and that of falls without loss of consciousness from 0.27 to 0.15 (p < 0.001) before vs. after implantation. Sixty-three patients (32.0%) died. Impaired mobility (OR 2.60, 95%CI 1.22-5.54, p = 0.013), malnutrition (OR 3.26, 95%CI 1.52-7.01, p = 0.002), and a higher CCI (OR per point increase 1.25, 95%CI 1.04-1.50, p = 0.019) at baseline were significant predictors of mortality. Among 169 patients who survived for more than 1 year and thus underwent follow-up CGA, CGA domains did not deteriorate during follow-up, except for ADLs. This decline in ADLs during follow-up was the strongest predictor of later nursing home admission (OR 9.29, 95%CI 1.82-47.49, p = 0.007). Higher baseline age (OR per year increase 1.10, 95%CI 1.02-1.20, p = 0.018) and a higher baseline CCI (OR per point increase 1.32, 95%CI 1.05-1.65, p = 0.017) were associated with a decline in ADLs during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS CGA is useful to detect functional deficits, which are associated with mortality or nursing home admission after pacemaker implantation. The present study seems to support the use of CGA in older patients undergoing pacemaker implantation as functional deficits and falls are amenable to geriatric interventions

Treatment of coronary lesions with a novel crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon

BackgroundThere is mounting data supporting the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) not only for treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR), but also in native coronary artery disease. So far, paclitaxel-coated balloons represented the mainstay DCBs. The SeQuent® crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) (B.Braun Medical Inc, Germany) represents a novel DCB, which allows a sustained release of the limus-drug. We evaluated its performance in an all-comer cohort, including complex coronary lesions.MethodsConsecutive patients treated with the SeQuent® SCB were analyzed from the prospective SIROOP registry (NCT04988685). We assessed clinical outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and cardiovascular death. Angiograms and outcomes were independently adjudicated.ResultsFrom March 2021 to March 2023, we enrolled 126 patients and lesions, of which 100 (79%) treated using a “DCB-only” strategy and 26 (21%) with a hybrid approach (DES + DCB). The mean age was 68 ± 10 years, 48 (38%) patients had an acute coronary syndrome. Regarding lesion characteristics, ISR was treated in 27 (21%), 11 (9%) underwent CTO-PCI and 59 (47%) of the vessels were moderate to severe calcified. Procedural success rate was 100%. At a median follow-up time of 12.7 (IQR 12; 14.2) months, MACE occurred in 5 patients (4.3%). No acute vessel closure was observed.ConclusionsOur data indicates promising outcomes following treatment with this novel crystalline SCB in an all-comer cohort with complex coronary lesions. These results require further investigation with randomized trials

“Burying” covered coronary stents under drug-eluting stents: A novel approach to ensure long-term stent patency

Background: Covered coronary stent (CS) implantation is associated with a high risk for in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST). We describe the outcomes after overstenting (“burying”) CS using contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES). Methods: We analyzed short- and long-term outcomes of consecutive patients who had had a CS implanted, which was consecutively covered (“buried”) with a third-generation DES. CSs were primarily post-dilated and then covered with a longer DES overlapping the proximal and distal edges of the CS. To ensure optimal stent expansion and appositions, all lesions were post-dilated using adequately sized non-compliant balloons. Results: Between 2015 and 2020, 23 patients (mean age 67 ± 14 years, 74% males) were treated using this novel approach. Reasons for implanting CS included treatment of coronary aneurysms (n = 7; 30%), coronary perforations (n = 13; 57%), and aorto-ostial dissections (n = 3; 13%). All CSs were successfully deployed, and no peri-procedural complications occurred. The median time of follow-up was 24.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 11.7–37.9) months. All patients had a 1-month follow-up (FU) and 19/23 (83%) patients had 12-month FU (FU range 1–60 months). No probable or definite STs occurred, and no cardiovascular deaths were observed. Among patients undergoing angiographic FU (11/23 [48%]), 1/23 showed angiographically significant ISR 6 months post CS implantation. Conclusions: Burying a coronary CS under a DES appears to be a safe and promising strategy to overcome the limitations of the currently available CS devices, including a relatively high risk for target lesion failure due to ISR and ST