Worldwide management of oral anticoagulant therapy: the ISAM study

I.F. 1.093 A multicenter, observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients, receiving oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) for stroke prophylaxis in chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) was conducted in the US, Canada, France, Italy and Spain according to their predominant model of care [routine medical care (RMC) or Anticoagulation Clinic care (ACC)]. The study objectives were to assess anticoagulation control (time in target range), and to describe the features of the local model of care. Consecutive patients were recruited on the basis of a minimum of 60 days of oral anticoagulant treatment over a 12 month period, and clinic and physician details were captured by means of a structured face-to-face or telephone interview. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) was calculated by using linear interpolation between INR values. A total of 1511 patients were recruited, of whom 1445 were included in the analysis of TTR. TTR was higher in ACC (69.5% and 64.9% for Italy and Spain, respectively) with respect to RMC (58.1%, 62.8% and 59.3% for the US, Canada and France, respectively). Mean intervals between INR determinations were between 3 and 4 weeks. Dose changes in case of INR outside therapeutic range were more frequent in Spain and less frequent in France. Striking differences were observed in type of VKA used, specialists involved in patient management, and dosage instructions. Studying of anticoagulation management based on local models of care highlights important discrepancies among countries and suggests further standardization of the management of this important therapy is necessary

Antibody profiles for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

IF 3.50

A comparison between six- and four-week intervals in surveillance of oral anticoagulant treatment

We determined whether international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring at 6 weeks rather than 4 weeks would benefit patients and reduce costs. Patients receiving stable oral anticoagulation treatment (target INR, 3.0) with a prosthetic mechanical heart valve for more than 6 months were randomized for a maximum interval between INR determinations of 6 weeks (group 1, n = 59) or 4 weeks (group 2 [control], n = 65). Patients were followed up for 2 years. The primary end point of the study was the biologic risk of overanticoagulation or underanticoagulation, estimated as the rate of values at risk (INR, 5). The rates of INR values at risk for hemorrhagic (INR, > 5) or thromboembolic (INR, < 1.5) complications were 3.27% in group 1 and 3.09% in group 2 (P = .81). The INRs of patients in group 1 trended toward higher values, but no difference between groups was observed in time spent at various INR ranges by using the method of linear change. The mean time between INR determinations was 24.9 +/- 18.1 days (1.20 per month) in group 1 and 22.5 +/- 9.5 days (1.33 per month) in group 2 (P < .0003). For patients in stable condition with a prosthetic heart valve who are monitored at an anticoagulation clinic, a 6-week interval between INR determinations does not increase the biologic risk of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events

Collateral coronary circulation in acute coronary syndrome: sometimes it's enough, sometimes it's not!

A young patient experienced two subsequent acute coronary syndromes due to left anterior descending (LAD) artery occlusion. Different ability of homocoronary collateral vessels to supply the ischemic territories, depending on the site of LAD artery occlusion, was associated with different clinical consequences. The case underscores the crucial role of the collateral circulation in limiting the effects of acute coronary occlusions

Low molecular weight heparin (parnaparin) for cardioembolic events prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective electrical cardioversion: a prospective cohort study

Systemic thromboembolism is a severe complication in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion (ECV) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Vitamin K antagonists greatly reduce the risk of thromboembolic events, but the administration scheme before ECV is troublesome as difficulties in reaching and maintaining the target therapeutic range for 3 weeks often delay the restoration and likelihood of maintaining sinus rhythm. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) do not need dose adjustment, and may be preferable in this clinical setting. In this multicentre study, the LMWH parnaparin was used at a dose of 85 anti-factor Xa U/kg b.i.d. 2 weeks before and 3 weeks after ECV of AF. In an intention to treat analysis of 102 patients, there was no systemic thromboembolism or major bleeding (0%, 95% CI 0-3.6). Two clinically relevant non-major bleeds (2.5%, 95% CI 0.7-8.8) and three minor bleeds (3.8%, 95% CI 1.3-10.6) were recorded. No heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or other major adverse events were recorded. Parnaparin appears effective and safe for thromboprophylaxis of elective ECV in patients with AF

Lower versus standard intensity oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in elderly warfarin-experienced patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation A randomised primary prevention trial

It has been observed that elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) benefit from standard [an international normalised ratio (INR) goal of 2.0-3.0] oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT). The hypothesis that lower-intensity anticoagulation therapy can offset the higher bleeding risk in this population has never been tested in an 'ad hoc' clinical trial. Patients over 75 years of age with NVAF were randomised to receive warfarin to maintain the INR at 1.8 (range 1.5-2.0) or at a standard target of 2.5 (range 2.0-3.0). There were 135 patients in the low-intensity and 132 in the standard-intensity groups. During a mean follow-up lasting 5.1 years, 59 primary outcome events (thromboembolism and major haemorrhage) were recorded, 24 (3.5 per 100 patient-years) in the low-intensity group and 35 (5.0 per 100 patient-years) in the standard-intensity group (HR=0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.1, p=0.1). The reduction in the primary endpoint was mainly due to a diminution in major bleedings (1.9 vs. 3.0 per 100 patient-years; HR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p=0.1). The median achieved INR value was 1.86 in the low-intensity and 2.24 in the standard-intensity group (p75) being managed in an anticoagulation clinic for primary stroke prevention with low-intensity anticoagulation (INR 1.5-2.0). However, further trials are needed to confirm the hypothesis generated by the present study