9 research outputs found

    The pharmacokinetics of the interstitial space in humans

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of extracellular solutes is determined by the blood-tissue exchange kinetics and the volume of distribution in the interstitial space in the different organs. This information can be used to develop a general physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model applicable to most extracellular solutes. METHODS: The human pharmacokinetic literature was surveyed to tabulate the steady state and equilibrium volume of distribution of the solutes mannitol, EDTA, morphine-6-glucuronide, morphine-3-glucuronide, inulin and β-lactam antibiotics with a range of protein binding (amoxicillin, piperacillin, cefatrizine, ceforanide, flucloxacillin, dicloxacillin). A PBPK data set was developed for extracellular solutes based on the literature for interstitial organ volumes. The program PKQuest was used to generate the PBPK model predictions. The pharmacokinetics of the protein (albumin) bound β-lactam antibiotics were characterized by two parameters: 1) the free fraction of the solute in plasma; 2) the interstitial albumin concentration. A new approach to estimating the capillary permeability is described, based on the pharmacokinetics of the highly protein bound antibiotics. RESULTS: About 42% of the total body water is extracellular. There is a large variation in the organ distribution of this water – varying from about 13% of total tissue water for skeletal muscle, up to 70% for skin and connective tissue. The weakly bound antibiotics have flow limited capillary-tissue exchange kinetics. The highly protein bound antibiotics have a significant capillary permeability limitation. The experimental pharmacokinetics of the 11 solutes is well described using the new PBPK data set and PKQuest. CONCLUSIONS: Only one adjustable parameter (systemic clearance) is required to completely characterize the PBPK for these extracellular solutes. Knowledge of just this systemic clearance allows one to predict the complete time course of the absolute drug concentrations in the major organs. PKQuest is freely available

    Concentration-effect relationships of morphine and morphine-6beta-glucuronide in the rat

    No full text
    1. The aims of the present study were to determine the relationship between the antinociceptive effect and concentrations of morphine and morphine-6 beta-glucuronide (M6G) in plasma and in the brain. 2. Morphine (14.0 and 28.0 mumol/kg) or M6G (8.67 and 17.3 mumol/kg) were administered s.c. to male Hooded-Wistar rats. The antinociceptive effect was measured by the thermal tail-flick method at various times up to 2 h and concentrations of morphine, morphine-3 beta-glucuronide (M3G) and M6G in plasma and in the brain were determined. 3. With a two-fold increment in morphine dose, the areas under the antinociceptive effect-, plasma morphine concentration- and brain morphine concentration-time curves increased by 1.9-, 2.3- and 2.3-fold, respectively. The area under the plasma M3G concentration-time curve increased 2.7-fold. Morphine-6 beta-glucuronide was not detected in any sample. For M6G, doubling of the dose led to a 1.7-fold increase in the area under the curve for plasma-time M6G concentrations but an 8.7-fold increase in the area under the curve for the antinociception-time effect. Concentrations of M6G in the brain were below the limit of quantification. The relationship between antinociceptive effect and plasma morphine or M6G were characterized by counter-clockwise hysteresis loops, probably reflecting a delay in crossing the blood-brain barrier. 4. Morphine-6 beta-glucuronide was approximately equipotent to morphine on the basis of dose, but substantially more potent on the basis of brain concentration

    The Effect of Nizatidine, a MATE2K Selective Inhibitor, on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Metformin in Healthy Volunteers

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the proximal tubule, basic drugs are transported from the renal cells to the tubule lumen through the concerted action of the H(+)/organic cation antiporters, multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 (MATE1) and 2K (MATE2K). Dual inhibitors of the MATE transporters have been shown to have a clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of concomitantly administered basic drugs. However, the clinical impact of selective renal organic cation transport inhibition on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of basic drugs, such as metformin, is unknown. This study sought to identify a selective MATE2K inhibitor in vitro and to determine its clinical impact on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin in healthy subjects. METHODS: A strategic cell-based screen of 71 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications was conducted to identify selective inhibitors of renal organic cation transporters that are capable of inhibiting at clinically relevant concentrations. From this screen, nizatidine was identified and predicted to be a clinically potent and selective inhibitor of MATE2K-mediated transport. The effect of nizatidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin was evaluated in 12 healthy volunteers in an open-label, randomized, two-phase crossover drug-drug interaction (DDI) study. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, the MATE2K-selective inhibitor, nizatidine, significantly increased the apparent volume of distribution, half-life and hypoglycemic activity of metformin. However, despite achieving unbound maximum concentrations greater than the in vitro inhibition potency (IC(50)) of MATE2K-mediated transport, nizatidine did not affect the renal clearance or net secretory clearance of metformin. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a selective inhibition of MATE2K by nizatidine, affected the apparent volume of distribution, tissue levels and peripheral effects of metformin. However, nizatidine did not alter systemic concentrations or the renal clearance of metformin, suggesting that specific MATE2K inhibition may not be sufficient to cause renal DDIs with basic drugs

    Renal handling of drugs and xenobiotics

    No full text
    corecore