8 research outputs found
Evaluating the impact of MEDLINE filters on evidence retrieval: study protocol
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Rather than searching the entire MEDLINE database, clinicians can perform searches on a filtered set of articles where relevant information is more likely to be found. Members of our team previously developed two types of MEDLINE filters. The 'methods' filters help identify clinical research of high methodological merit. The 'content' filters help identify articles in the discipline of renal medicine. We will now test the utility of these filters for physician MEDLINE searching.</p> <p>Hypothesis</p> <p>When a physician searches MEDLINE, we hypothesize the use of filters will increase the number of relevant articles retrieved (increase 'recall,' also called sensitivity) and decrease the number of non-relevant articles retrieved (increase 'precision,' also called positive predictive value), compared to the performance of a physician's search unaided by filters.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We will survey a random sample of 100 nephrologists in Canada to obtain the MEDLINE search that they would first perform themselves for a focused clinical question. Each question we provide to a nephrologist will be based on the topic of a recently published, well-conducted systematic review. We will examine the performance of a physician's unaided MEDLINE search. We will then apply a total of eight filter combinations to the search (filters used in isolation or in combination). We will calculate the recall and precision of each search. The filter combinations that most improve on unaided physician searches will be identified and characterized.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>If these filters improve search performance, physicians will be able to search MEDLINE for renal evidence more effectively, in less time, and with less frustration. Additionally, our methodology can be used as a proof of concept for the evaluation of search filters in other disciplines.</p
Foundations of Community Engagement at UD
This session will connect the Fitz Center\u27s Practiced Principles for Community Engagement to our Marianist Charism. Participants in this session will get a better understanding of what Community Engagement and Community Engaged Learning is here at the University of Dayton, as well as a better understanding of best practices as it relates to partnership with the community. This session will also highlight resources available to faculty and staff around community engagement
Connecting Values, Charism, and Community
This presentation focuses on tangible ways to connect our Marianist charism, students\u27 values and identities, and civic engagement. Through the example of the modular retreat Vox: Using Your Voice and Your Vote Faithfully, we will explore how students make the connection from discernment to action for participation in civic society. We, along with Samantha Kennedy, created Vox during the 2020 election as a virtual engagement opportunity and adapted it for the 2022 midterm elections as a PATH-eligible online retreat. Session participants will have an opportunity to think creatively about how to communicate broad and abstract ideas to students in tangible ways that reduce anxiety and instill hope for action in the future
Adaptation and Change: Answering the Challenge Brought by COVID-19 with New and Adapted Student Programs in Social Justice
This session will look at some creative ways the panelists worked together to continue to provide reflective, educational, and prayerful social justice-based programming for students while adapting to COVID-19 restrictions. Answering the need for anti-racist education, the Awaken Retreat was created, allowing students an opportunity to explore how their faith calls them to be anti-racist. The Center for Social Concernâs long-standing REAL Dayton experience was still able to connect students to the cty of Dayton while keeping everyone safe. Finally, 2020 also called for education on the elections; the Vox Retreat, available to students through downloadable modules, allowed participants to learn how to use their voice this election year, guided by their faith or personal values. The presenters will share the joys and challenges of creating and adapting these programs during this very different year