Characteristic magnetic field and speed properties of interplanetary coronal mass ejections and their sheath regions

Prediction of the solar wind conditions in near-Earth space, arising from both quasi-steady and transient structures, is essential for space weather forecasting. To achieve forecast lead times of a day or more, such predictions must be made on the basis of remote solar observations. A number of empirical prediction schemes have been proposed to forecast the transit time and speed of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) at 1 AU. However, the current lack of magnetic field measurements in the corona severely limits our ability to forecast the 1 AU magnetic field strengths resulting from interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs). In this study we investigate the relation between the characteristic magnetic field strengths and speeds of both magnetic cloud and noncloud ICMEs at 1 AU. Correlation between field and speed is found to be significant only in the sheath region ahead of magnetic clouds, not within the clouds themselves. The lack of such a relation in the sheaths ahead of noncloud ICMEs is consistent with such ICMEs being skimming encounters of magnetic clouds, though other explanations are also put forward. Linear fits to the radial speed profiles of ejecta reveal that faster-traveling ICMEs are also expanding more at 1 AU. We combine these empirical relations to form a prediction scheme for the magnetic field strength in the sheaths ahead of magnetic clouds and also suggest a method for predicting the radial speed profile through an ICME on the basis of upstream measurements

Origins of the Ambient Solar Wind: Implications for Space Weather

The Sun's outer atmosphere is heated to temperatures of millions of degrees, and solar plasma flows out into interplanetary space at supersonic speeds. This paper reviews our current understanding of these interrelated problems: coronal heating and the acceleration of the ambient solar wind. We also discuss where the community stands in its ability to forecast how variations in the solar wind (i.e., fast and slow wind streams) impact the Earth. Although the last few decades have seen significant progress in observations and modeling, we still do not have a complete understanding of the relevant physical processes, nor do we have a quantitatively precise census of which coronal structures contribute to specific types of solar wind. Fast streams are known to be connected to the central regions of large coronal holes. Slow streams, however, appear to come from a wide range of sources, including streamers, pseudostreamers, coronal loops, active regions, and coronal hole boundaries. Complicating our understanding even more is the fact that processes such as turbulence, stream-stream interactions, and Coulomb collisions can make it difficult to unambiguously map a parcel measured at 1 AU back down to its coronal source. We also review recent progress -- in theoretical modeling, observational data analysis, and forecasting techniques that sit at the interface between data and theory -- that gives us hope that the above problems are indeed solvable.Comment: Accepted for publication in Space Science Reviews. Special issue connected with a 2016 ISSI workshop on "The Scientific Foundations of Space Weather." 44 pages, 9 figure

Suplementação da Silagem de Sorgo com Diferentes Fontes de Proteína para Bovinos de Corte Supplementation of Sorghum Silage with Different Sources of Protein for Beef Cattle

Farelo de soja (FS), farinha de penas (FPH) e farelo de soja tratado (FST) com 0,17% de formaldeído foram utilizados como suplementos à silagem de sorgo para avaliar os seus efeitos sobre o consumo, o desempenho e a digestibilidade aparente dos nutrientes em bovinos machos. O tratamento do farelo de soja com formaldeído não diferiu do farelo de soja não tratado para todos os ítens estudados. Por outro lado, a farinha de penas apresentou menores coeficientes de digestibilidade para a MS, MO, PB, FDN e FDA (63,0; 64,9; 61,80; 56,4; e 50,9% versus 65,1; 67,0; 66,8; 58,5; e 53,6% do FS e 66,7; 68,7; 67,2; 61,9; e 57,5% do FST, respectivamente), além de propiciar menor consumo de energia metabolizável por unidade de tamanho metabólico (214 kcal/UTM para a FPH, 234 kcal/UTM para o FS e de 240 kcal/UTM para o FST). Mesmo com estas diferenças nos parâmetros acima mencionados, não foi possível detectar diferenças para o ganho de peso dos animais, de 1,5; 1,6 e 1,7 kg/dia para FPH, FS e FST, respectivamente.<br>Soybean meal (SBM), feather meal (FTM) and treated soybean meal (TSBM) with 0.17% of formaldehyde were used as supplement of sorghum silage to evaluate the effect on intake, performance and nutrient digestibilities with young bulls. Treatment of soybean meal with formaldehyde did not differ from soybean not treated, for all studied parameters. Feather meal supplement presented lower digestibility coefficients for DM, OM, CP, NDF and ADF (63.0, 65.5, 61.8, 56.4, and 50.9%, versus 65.1, 67.0, 66.8, 58.5, and 53.6% for soybean meal and 66.7, 68.7, 67.2, 61.9 and 57.5% for treated soybean meal, respectively). It also showed lower metabolizable energy intake by unit of metabolic weight (214 kcal/MW for FTM, 234 kcal/MW for SBM and 240 kcal/MW for TSBM). Even if differences were observed for all parameters, it was not possible to detect differences in live weight gain (1.5, 1.6 and 1.7 kg/d for FTM, SBM and TSBM)