7 research outputs found

    Mild Hypercapnia or Normocapnia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

    No full text
    Background Guidelines recommend normocapnia for adults with coma who are resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, mild hypercapnia increases cerebral blood flow and may improve neurologic outcomes. Methods We randomly assigned adults with coma who had been resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac or unknown cause and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in a 1:1 ratio to either 24 hours of mild hypercapnia (target partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide [Paco₂], 50 to 55 mm Hg) or normocapnia (target Paco₂, 35 to 45 mm Hg). The primary outcome was a favorable neurologic outcome, defined as a score of 5 (indicating lower moderate disability) or higher, as assessed with the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended (range, 1 [death] to 8, with higher scores indicating better neurologic outcome) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included death within 6 months. Results A total of 1700 patients from 63 ICUs in 17 countries were recruited, with 847 patients assigned to targeted mild hypercapnia and 853 to targeted normocapnia. A favorable neurologic outcome at 6 months occurred in 332 of 764 patients (43.5%) in the mild hypercapnia group and in 350 of 784 (44.6%) in the normocapnia group (relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.11; P=0.76). Death within 6 months after randomization occurred in 393 of 816 patients (48.2%) in the mild hypercapnia group and in 382 of 832 (45.9%) in the normocapnia group (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.16). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions In patients with coma who were resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, targeted mild hypercapnia did not lead to better neurologic outcomes at 6 months than targeted normocapnia.Glenn Eastwood, Alistair D. Nichol, Carol Hodgson, Rachael L. Parke, Shay McGuinness, Niklas Nielsen, Stephen Bernard, Markus B. Skrifvars, Dion Stub, Fabio S. Taccone, John Archer, Demetrios Kutsogiannis, Josef Dankiewicz, Gisela Lilja, Tobias Cronberg, Hans Kirkegaard, Gilles Capellier, Giovanni Landoni, Janneke Horn, Theresa Olasveengen, Yaseen Arabi, Yew Woon Chia, Andrej Markota, Matthias Hænggi, Matt P. Wise, Anders M. Grejs, Steffen Christensen, Heidi Munk-Andersen, Asger Granfeldt, Geir Ø. Andersen, Eirik Qvigstad, Arnljot Flaa, Matthew Thomas, Katie Sweet, Jeremy Bewley, Minna Bäcklund, Marjaana Tiainen, Manuela Iten, Anja Levis, Leah Peck, James Walsham, Adam Deane, Angajendra Ghosh, Filippo Annoni, Yan Chen, David Knight, Eden Lesona, Haytham Tlayjeh, Franc Svenšek, Peter J. McGuigan, Jade Cole, David Pogson, Matthias P. Hilty, Joachim P. Düring, Michael J. Bailey, Eldho Paul, Bridget Ady, Kate Ainscough, Anna Hunt, Sinéad Monahan, Tony Trapani, Ciara Fahey, and Rinaldo Bellomo, for the TAME Study Investigator

    Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

    No full text
    Targeted temperature management is recommended for patients after cardiac arrest, but the supporting evidence is of low certainty. In an open-label trial with blinded assessment of outcomes, we randomly assigned 1900 adults with coma who had had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac or unknown cause to undergo targeted hypothermia at 33°C, followed by controlled rewarming, or targeted normothermia with early treatment of fever (body temperature, ≥37.8°C). The primary outcome was death from any cause at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome at 6 months as assessed with the modified Rankin scale. Prespecified subgroups were defined according to sex, age, initial cardiac rhythm, time to return of spontaneous circulation, and presence or absence of shock on admission. Prespecified adverse events were pneumonia, sepsis, bleeding, arrhythmia resulting in hemodynamic compromise, and skin complications related to the temperature management device. A total of 1850 patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. At 6 months, 465 of 925 patients (50%) in the hypothermia group had died, as compared with 446 of 925 (48%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.14; P = 0.37). Of the 1747 patients in whom the functional outcome was assessed, 488 of 881 (55%) in the hypothermia group had moderately severe disability or worse (modified Rankin scale score ≥4), as compared with 479 of 866 (55%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.09). Outcomes were consistent in the prespecified subgroups. Arrhythmia resulting in hemodynamic compromise was more common in the hypothermia group than in the normothermia group (24% vs. 17%, P<0.001). The incidence of other adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. In patients with coma after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, targeted hypothermia did not lead to a lower incidence of death by 6 months than targeted normothermia. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; TTM2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02908308.)
    corecore