LIGHTSITE II Randomized Multicenter Trial: Evaluation of Multiwavelength Photobiomodulation in Non-exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

INTRODUCTION Photobiomodulation (PBM) represents a potential treatment for non-exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). PBM uses wavelengths of light to target components of the mitochondrial respiratory chain to improve cellular bioenergetic outputs. The aim of this study was to further investigate the effects of PBM on clinical, quality of life (QoL) and anatomical outcomes in subjects with intermediate stage non-exudative AMD. METHODS The multicenter LIGHTSITE II study was a randomized clinical trial evaluating safety and efficacy of PBM in intermediate non-exudative AMD. The LumiThera Valeda® Light Delivery System delivered multiwavelength PBM (590, 660 and 850 nm) or sham treatment 3 × per week over 3-4 weeks (9 treatments per series) with repeated treatments at baseline (BL), 4 and 8 months. Subjects were enrolled with 20/32 to 20/100 best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and no central geographic atrophy (GA) within the central fovea (500 μm). RESULTS LIGHTSITE II enrolled 44 non-exudative AMD subjects (53 eyes). PBM-treated eyes showed statistically significant improvement in BCVA at 9 months (n = 32 eyes, p = 0.02) with a 4-letter gain in the PBM-treated group versus a 0.5-letter gain in the sham-treated group (ns, p < 0.1) for patients that received all 27 PBM treatments (n = 29 eyes). Approximately 35.3% of PBM-treated eyes showed ≥ 5-letter improvement at 9 months. Macular drusen volume was not increased over time in the PBM-treated group but did show increases in the sham-treated group. While PBM and sham groups both showed GA lesion growth in the trial period, there was 20% less growth in the PBM group over 10 months, suggesting potential disease-modifying effects. No safety concerns or signs of phototoxicity were observed. CONCLUSION These results confirm previous clinical testing of multiwavelength PBM and support treatment with Valeda as a novel therapy with a unique mechanism of action as a potential treatment for non-exudative AMD. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrial.Gov Registration Identifier: NCT03878420

LIGHTSITE III: 13-Month Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Multiwavelength Photobiomodulation in Nonexudative (Dry) Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using the LumiThera Valeda Light Delivery System.

PURPOSE The LIGHTSITE III study evaluated multiwavelength photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy in nonexudative (dry) AMD using the LumiThera Valeda® Light Delivery System. METHODS LIGHTSITE III is a randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of PBM in dry AMD. Subjects were treated with multiwavelength PBM (590, 660 and 850 nm) or Sham treatment delivered 9 treatments over 3-5 weeks every four months over 24 months. Subjects were assessed for efficacy and safety outcomes. Data from the 13-month analysis are presented in this report. RESULTS A total of 100 subjects (148 eyes) with dry AMD were randomized. LIGHTSITE III met the primary efficacy BCVA endpoint with a significant difference between PBM (n = 91 eyes) and Sham (n = 54 eyes) groups (Between group difference: 2.4 letters (SE 1.15), CI: -4.7 - -0.1, p = 0.02)(PBM alone: 5.4 letters (SE 0.96), CI: 3.5 - 7.3, p < 0.0001; Sham alone: 3.0 letters (SE 1.13), CI: 0.7 - 5.2, p < 0.0001). The PBM group showed a significant decrease in new onset GA (p = 0.024, Fisher exact test, odds ratio 9.4). A favorable safety profile was observed. CONCLUSIONS LIGHTSITE III provides a prospective, randomized controlled trial showing improved clinical and anatomical outcomes in intermediate dry AMD following PBM

Flashpoint: the Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict and Its Implications For Regional States

The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan is not only one of the bloodiest and most intractable clashes to emerge from the breakup of the U.S.S.R., but it is also the only post-Soviet conflict that poses a potentially explosive threat to peace and security on a regional scale. Ostensibly an armed dispute over the administrative status of Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian-inhabited enclave residing within the borders of Azerbaijan, the seven-year clash in the southern Transcaucasus has also posed significant opportunities and risks for Russia, Turkey, and Iran. Driven by the dual desire to expand their leverage in the region while preventing the rise of potential threats to their own security, the three external powers each attempted to influence the course of Armenian-Azerbaijani hostilities according to their respective geopolitical agendas. Although this process has been carried out peacefully thus far, the possibility remains that one or more of the major outside actors will become involved openly in the Karabakh conflict, with potentially grave implications for regional--and perhaps global--security