The level of performance stabilization influences motor adaptation on an isometric force control task

<div><p>This study compared the effects of two levels of performance stabilization on the adaptation to unpredictable perturbations in an isometric control force task with the goal of controlling 40% of the maximum force. The experiment consisted of pre-exposure and exposure phases. In the pre-exposure two levels of performance stabilization were manipulated: a stabilization group (SG) performed three trials in a row while maintaining 40% of the maximum force for three seconds and an absolute error less than or equal to 5% (i.e., the criteria of performance), and a superstabilization group (SSG) performed six blocks of the same criteria. During the exposure phase, the task was the same as that in the pre-exposure phase; however, it was inserted 9 trials of perturbations when the task goal changed to 60% of the maximum force. We measured the %RMSE, RMS from the biceps and triceps brachii and co-contraction. In the pre-exposure phase, both groups showed similar performance and muscle activity. When exposed to the perturbations, SSG performance more quickly returned to the previous level of accuracy, showed lower muscle activation and demonstrated a greater muscle co-contraction than did SG. The results give support to the adaptive process model on motor learning.</p></div

Measures from SG and SSG in the pre-exposure phase.

<p>a) Mean of root mean square error (RMSE%); b) (RMS) of biceps; c) (RMS) of triceps; d) Co-contraction.</p

Load cell tension and compression, analog-digital converter and computer.

<p>Load cell tension and compression, analog-digital converter and computer.</p

Measures from SG and SSG in exposure phase.

<p>a) Mean (RMSE%); b) (RMS) of biceps; c) (RMS) of triceps; d) Co-contraction.</p