Willingness to be circumcised among 127 uncircumcised men who have sex with men not known to be HIV-infected who attended Gay Pride and Minority Gay Pride events in 7 U.S. cities – 2006.

*<p>Median age of respondents was 33 years.</p

Demographic characteristics, behavioral risk factors, HIV testing history, and use of prevention services and agreement with perceived risks and benefits of circumcision and willingness to be circumcised among 133 uncircumcised men who have sex with men not known to be HIV-infected who attended Gay Pride and Minority Gay Pride events in 7 U.S. cities by willingness to be circumcised as an adult – 2006.

*<p>Respondents could select more than one race.</p>†<p>Other race includes American Indians/Alaskan Native, Asians/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders, and people reporting “other” race.</p>‡<p>Five uncircumcised respondents did not provide data for the perceived risks and benefits statements, therefore N = 127.</p

Demographic characteristics, behavioral risk factors, HIV testing history, and use of prevention services among 780 men who have sex with men who attended Gay Pride and Minority Gay Pride events in 7 U.S. cities by circumcision status – 2006.

*<p>Respondents could select more than one race.</p>†<p>Other race includes American Indians/Alaskan Native, Asians/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders, and people reporting “other” race.</p>‡<p>Two respondents reported >10 male partners.</p>§<p>For this question, n = 777 because 3 respondents answered ‘don't know.’</p

Preferred Family Planning Method.^*

*<p>Choices were not mutually exclusive. Number (percent) indicates the number (percentage) of women of the total who chose each FP method. Totals may vary due to missing data.</p

Reasons Given by Women Who Had Never Used a Condom.^*

*<p>Number (percent) indicates the number (percentage) of women who chose each response. Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Sample sizes (in parentheses) may vary due to missing data.</p

Predictors of Intention to Use Family Planning.^*

*<p>Number (percent) indicates the number (percentage) of women of the total who intended to use family planning. Sample sizes (in parentheses) may vary due to missing data.</p>§<p>Only for 63 participants who had a previous history of an STI other than HIV.</p

Flow diagram of women enrolled n the Kisumu breastfeeding study.

<p>Flow diagram of women enrolled n the Kisumu breastfeeding study.</p

Baseline Maternal Characteristics of 522 HIV-Infected Women Initiating ARV Therapy for PMTCT in the Kisumu Breastfeeding Study, July 2003 to November 2006.^*

*<p>Number indicates the number of women who chose each response. Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Sample sizes (in parentheses) may vary due to missing data.</p>§<p>KSh 85 per 1 US dollar (rate varies).</p

Women's Perception of Family Planning Acceptance by Spouse or Partner.^*

*<p>Number (percent) indicates the number (percentage) of women who chose each response. Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Sample sizes (in parentheses) may vary due to missing data.</p

Single predictor analysis of determinants and experiences of repeat pregnancy among HIV-infected women in the Kisumu breastfeeding study, Kenya, 2003–2009.

<p>^aSample sizes fluctuate for some variables owing to missing data.</p><p>^bm = number of repeat pregnancies for each row category; r = total number in each row category.</p><p>^cThe exchange rate was approximately 85 Kenya Shillings (Ksh.) per 1 US dollar (rate varies over study period).</p><p>*P-value ≤ 0.05</p><p>Single predictor analysis of determinants and experiences of repeat pregnancy among HIV-infected women in the Kisumu breastfeeding study, Kenya, 2003–2009.</p