The Careful Scholarship of Justice Charles Horowitz

How appropriately the editors of this review have elected to dedicate some of its pages to honor a distinguished lawyer and judge whose legal career has closely paralleled the history of the publication itself. The name of Charles Horowitz appears on the masthead of the first two volumes, first as member and then as president of its editorial board. In later years, he has written for the Review, citing and analyzing decisions of the courts on which he later sat. That other Review authors have not always agreed with him will neither shock, wound, nor surprise him. After all, the initials C.H., matching no other student\u27s name on the Review\u27s masthead at the time, identify the author of two notes in the volume for which he served as president of the board, and the conclusion reached in both is that the court arrived at an erroneous decision. There is no reason to believe that after years of experience in practice and on the bench, he would deal differently with a legal opinion. There is, however, reason to believe that at the time he was in law school, he could not have foreseen the types of problems with which he was later forced to come to grips as a judge on this state\u27s court of appeals and supreme court

Sales—A Comparison of the Law in Washington and the Uniform Commercial Code (Part V)

The final part of this five-part article, resuming with section 2-701, Remedies for Breach of Collateral Contracts Not Impaired

Sales—A Comparison of the Law in Washington and the Uniform Commercial Code (Part 2)

This article is a continuation of the analysis made by Professor Ralph Johnson in an earlier issue of this Review of the effect on Washington law of article 2 (Sales) of the Uniform Commercial Code. As such, it will continue the format there established of a section by section analysis of the Code. Continues with section 2-204, Formation in General

The Revised Washington Criminal Code\u27s Vital Structure: The Burden of Proof, Felony Murder, and Justification Provisions

I have chosen to discuss three areas of the Proposed Code: the proof requirement (with primary emphasis upon the affirmative defenses), justification, and felony murder. These sections are vital underpinnings of the Proposed Code. The Code makes substantial changes in each of these provisions, all of which deserve and demand critical review

Negotiable Instruments—A Comparison of Washington Law and Uniform Commercial Code Article 3 [Part 3]

The following article is the third in a series by Professor Richard Cosway on negotiable instruments in which he compares existing Washington law with Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Previous articles on Article 3 have appeared in 38 Wash. L. Rev. 501 (1963) and 38 Wash. L. Rev. 769 (1963)

Sales—A Comparison of the Law in Washington and the Uniform Commercial Code (Part IV)

Continues with section 2-501, Insurable Interest in Goods; Manner of Identification of Good