A method for identifying genetic heterogeneity within phenotypically defined disease subgroups.

Many common diseases show wide phenotypic variation. We present a statistical method for determining whether phenotypically defined subgroups of disease cases represent different genetic architectures, in which disease-associated variants have different effect sizes in two subgroups. Our method models the genome-wide distributions of genetic association statistics with mixture Gaussians. We apply a global test without requiring explicit identification of disease-associated variants, thus maximizing power in comparison to standard variant-by-variant subgroup analysis. Where evidence for genetic subgrouping is found, we present methods for post hoc identification of the contributing genetic variants. We demonstrate the method on a range of simulated and test data sets, for which expected results are already known. We investigate subgroups of individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) defined by autoantibody positivity, establishing evidence for differential genetic architecture with positivity for thyroid-peroxidase-specific antibody, driven generally by variants in known T1D-associated genomic regions.We acknowledge the help of the Diabetes and Inflammation Laboratory Data Service for access and quality control procedures on the data sets used in this study. The JDRF/Wellcome Trust Diabetes and Inflammation Laboratory is in receipt of a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (107212; J.A.T.) and receives funding from the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. J.L. is funded by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and is on the Wellcome Trust PhD program in Mathematical Genomics and Medicine at the University of Cambridge. C.W. is funded by the MRC (grant MC_UP_1302/5). We thank M. Simmonds, S. Gough, J. Franklyn, and O. Brand for sharing their AITD genetic association data set and all patients with AITD and control subjects for participating in this study. The AITD UK national collection was funded by the Wellcome Trust. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript