4 research outputs found
Influence of Morphology and Crystallinity on Surface Reactivity of Nanosized Anatase TiO<sub>2</sub> Studied by Adsorption Techniques. 1. The Use of Gaseous Molecular Probes
Various titanium dioxide nanoparticles were prepared
by solāgel
method in order to obtain samples showing different sizes and morphologies.
An original approach based on the adsorption of gaseous molecules
from the gas phase was proposed to gain information about surface
energy of nanosized TiO<sub>2</sub> anatase in terms of interfacial
reactivity and heterogeneity. Argon, nitrogen, and ammonia were selected
as such surface molecular probes. The mainly observed crystallographic
faces of anatase particles were the {101} and {001} surfaces together
with the {100} one. Their abundance was correlated with the energy
distribution inferred from the local isotherms of argon adsorption
in the low-pressure range. The acid character of the anatase surface
was probed by nitrogen molecules, and, consequently, the location
of polar sites on the particle surface could be determined in correlation
with the argon adsorption domains. Moreover, the number and the strength
of surface acid sites were evaluated with the aid of two-cycle adsorption
of gaseous ammonia supplemented by appropriate flow microcalorimetry
measurements. This molecular probe revealed significant differences
among the samples depending on their crystal shape or face distribution
Is There a Trojan-Horse Effect during Magnetic Nanoparticles and Metalloid Cocontamination of Human Dermal Fibroblasts?
This study investigates the issue of nanoparticles/pollutants
cocontamination.
By combining viability assays, physicochemical and structural analysis
(to probe the As speciation and valence), we assessed how Ī³Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles can affect the cytotoxicity, the
intra- and extracellular speciation of AsĀ(III). Human dermal fibroblasts
were contaminated with Ī³Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles
and AsĀ(III) considering two scenarios: (i) a simultaneous coinjection
of the nanoparticles and As, and (ii) an injection of the nanoparticles
after 24 h of As adsorption in water. In both scenarios, we did not
notice significant changes on the nanoparticles surface charge (zeta
potential ā¼āā10 mV) nor hydrodynamic diameters
(ā¼950 nm) after 24 h. We demonstrated that the coinjection
of Ī³Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles and As in the
cellular media strongly affects the complexation of the intracellular
As with thiol groups. This significantly increases at low doses the
cytotoxicity of the As nonadsorbed at the surface of the nanoparticles.
However, once As is adsorbed at the surface the desorption is very
weak in the culture medium. This fraction of As strongly adsorbed
at the surface is significantly less cytotoxic than As itself. On
the basis of our data and the thermodynamics, we demonstrated that
any disturbance of the biotransformation mechanisms by the nanoparticles
(<i>i.e.</i>, surface complexation of thiol groups with
the iron atoms) is likely to be responsible for the increase of the
As adverse effects at low doses
Solvent-free Preparation of Ru/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Catalysts for CO<sub>2</sub> Methanation: An Example of Frugal Innovation
To
reduce the environmental impact of supported catalyst production
in compliance with the recommendations of the UNās 12th objective,
which encourages more sustainable consumption and production patterns,
we propose to revisit solāgel chemistry in a more frugal mode.
The principle of frugal innovation is to simplify products and processes,
eliminate complexities to make solutions easier to understand and
use, and reduce production costs. By this way, the synthesis of ruthenium-based
catalysts supported on Ī³-AlOOH and Ī³-Al2O3 is revised via solvent-free solāgel chemistry. Such
catalysts are successfully prepared in one-pot preparation of the
active phase and the support using Ru(acac)3/Al alkoxide
that requires no sacrificial organic pore-generating agent, no washing,
and no filtration and produces no liquid waste. The mixed Ru/Al precursor
is hydrolyzed with a stoichiometric amount of water without any solvent.
The obtained materials containing 1 and 3% Ru/Al molar ratios have
high specific surface areas, from 300 to 690 m2Ā·gā1 and exhibit well dispersed NPs of 1ā4 nm on
Ī³-AlOOH with interesting CO2 methanation activity
and 100% CH4 selectivity. This proves that a frugal synthesis
approach can do as well as traditional synthesis methods while having
a much lower environmental impact (cE-factor, water consumption, and
energy consumption are 24, 69, and 24 to 42 times lower, respectively)
than the standard multistep protocol.
Solvent-free Preparation of Ru/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Catalysts for CO<sub>2</sub> Methanation: An Example of Frugal Innovation
To
reduce the environmental impact of supported catalyst production
in compliance with the recommendations of the UNās 12th objective,
which encourages more sustainable consumption and production patterns,
we propose to revisit solāgel chemistry in a more frugal mode.
The principle of frugal innovation is to simplify products and processes,
eliminate complexities to make solutions easier to understand and
use, and reduce production costs. By this way, the synthesis of ruthenium-based
catalysts supported on Ī³-AlOOH and Ī³-Al2O3 is revised via solvent-free solāgel chemistry. Such
catalysts are successfully prepared in one-pot preparation of the
active phase and the support using Ru(acac)3/Al alkoxide
that requires no sacrificial organic pore-generating agent, no washing,
and no filtration and produces no liquid waste. The mixed Ru/Al precursor
is hydrolyzed with a stoichiometric amount of water without any solvent.
The obtained materials containing 1 and 3% Ru/Al molar ratios have
high specific surface areas, from 300 to 690 m2Ā·gā1 and exhibit well dispersed NPs of 1ā4 nm on
Ī³-AlOOH with interesting CO2 methanation activity
and 100% CH4 selectivity. This proves that a frugal synthesis
approach can do as well as traditional synthesis methods while having
a much lower environmental impact (cE-factor, water consumption, and
energy consumption are 24, 69, and 24 to 42 times lower, respectively)
than the standard multistep protocol.