52 research outputs found

    Les préférences hédoniques et leur variabilité

    No full text
    Plan de la prĂ©sentation : 1. Peut‐on allĂ©ger en gras les produits du commerce sans perte de prĂ©fĂ©rences ?2. Le gras indissociable du sucre dans l’univers des biscuits 3. Un outil pour la mesure de la sensation de gras perçue applicable Ă  tout le rĂ©pertoire alimentaire4. Un questionnaire pour la mesure de la prĂ©fĂ©rence vis‐à‐vis du gras5. Un outil d’analyse sensorielle pour la mesure de la prĂ©fĂ©rence vis‐à‐vis du gra

    The Sensobase project

    No full text
    Poster P5.21 in abstracts.International audienc

    The Sensobase project

    No full text

    The Sensobase project

    No full text
    Poster P5.21 in abstracts.International audienc

    MĂ©thodes d'acquisition, de codage et d'analyse de profils sensoriels temporels

    No full text
    National audienceLa mĂ©thode de Temps-IntensitĂ© (TI) consiste Ă  mesurer l’évolution de la perception de l’intensitĂ© d’un descripteur au fil du temps de la dĂ©gustation d’un produit. Lorsque plusieurs descripteurs sont Ă©tudiĂ©s (situation du profil sensoriel), cette mĂ©thode devient quasiment impraticable car elle nĂ©cessite une dĂ©gustation par descripteur. Cette communication se propose de synthĂ©tiser un ensemble de travaux visant Ă  proposer des mĂ©thodes d’obtention de courbes des Ă©volutions temporelles de plusieurs descripteurs simultanĂ©ment. La premiĂšre de ces mĂ©thodes, Dominance Temporelle des Sensations (DTS) [1], a permis de restituer assez fidĂšlement les courbes TI de 10 descripteurs pour 5 produits laitiers. D’autre part, sur la base de plusieurs Ă©tudes portant sur des produits de natures variĂ©es, la mĂ©thode DTS s’est Ă©galement avĂ©rĂ©e capable de restituer l’essentiel de la carte sensorielle obtenue par un profil classique. Le codage des donnĂ©es et leur traitement statistique qui ont permis d’aboutir Ă  cette conclusion seront rappelĂ©s [2]. Une seconde mĂ©thode, IndĂ©pendant Temps IntensitĂ© Profil (ITIP), a Ă©tĂ© Ă©laborĂ©e pour pallier certaines limites du DTS qui seront discutĂ©es. Les mĂ©thodes DTS et ITIP sont comparĂ©es sur la base de deux Ă©tudes. La premiĂšre porte sur des chewing-gums expĂ©rimentaux comportant des arĂŽmes encapsulĂ©s de diffĂ©rentes maniĂšres afin de contrĂŽler la temporalitĂ© du signal sensoriel. La seconde porte sur des produits laitiers et permet de comparer DTS et ITIP entre eux, mais aussi de comparer ces profils temporels au profil classique

    Sensory acceptability of new plant protein meat substitutes

    No full text
    International audienceConsumers have been encouraged to reduce their consumption of meat for health and environmental reasons. A possible way is to substitute meat with plant protein alternatives; however, consumer acceptance of these products is far from settled, which might be due to taste. Therefore, it is important to identify sensory attributes that should be optimized to improve palatability. This paper is based on two consumer tests. In the first experiment, three recipes, each prepared with two or three different plant protein meat substitutes and with meat, were compared by 91 consumers using a liking scale and Check-All-That-Apply characterizations. An optimized variant of one of the meat substitutes was then produced by adding a flavor. During the second experiment, this new variant was prepared by following a single recipe and was tested by 69 consumers against a meat and two other plant protein meat substitutes from the market. Unlike in the first experiment, the consumers evaluated a full portion of each product during four different meals. They performed multiple-intake Temporal Dominance of Sensations (TDS) measurements, alternating with liking scales. The TDS evaluations also alternated texture measurements and flavor measurements over the intakes. Regarding both experiments, the meat was generally preferred; however, one plant protein meat substitute was truly appreciated, even more than the meat. Acceptance of the plant protein products depended on their composition and on the recipe. Sensory interpretations of these liking differences were proposed, and sensory drivers of liking were highlighted, which could lead to better acceptance of the products

    Do we need replications in sensory profiling?

    No full text
    absen
    • 

    corecore