Optimizing Large-Scale Biodiversity Sampling Effort: Toward an Unbalanced Survey Design: Toward an Unbalanced Survey Design

Acquiring marine biodiversity data is difficult, costly, and time consuming, making it challenging to understand the distribution and abundance of lifei n the ocean. Historically, approaches to biodiversity sampling over large geographic scales have advocated for equivalent effort across multiple sites to minimize comparative bias. When effort cannot be equalized, techniques such as rarefaction have been applied to minimize biases by reverting diversity estimates to equivalent numbers of samples or individuals. This often results in oversampling and wasted resources or inaccurately characterized communities due to undersampling. How, then, can we better determine an optimal survey design for characterizing species richness and community composition across a range of conditions and capacities without compromising taxonomic resolution and statistical power? Researchers in the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network Pole to Pole of the Americas (MBON Pole to Pole) are surveying rocky shore macroinvertebrates and algal communities spanning ~107° of latitude and 10 biogeographic ecoregions to address this question. Here, we apply existing techniques in the form of fixed-coverage subsampling and a complementary multivariate analysis to determine the optimal effort necessary for characterizing species richness and community composition across the network sampling sites. We show that oversampling for species richness varied between ~20% and 400% at over half of studied areas, while some locations were under sampled by up to 50%. Multivariate error analysis also revealed that most of the localities were oversampled by several-fold for benthic community composition. From this analysis, we advocate for an unbalanced sampling approach to support field programs in the collection of high-quality data, where preliminary information is used to set the minimum required effort to generate robust values of diversity and composition on a site-to-site basis. As part of this recommendation, we provide statistical tools in the open-source R statistical software to aid researchers inimplementing optimization strategies and expanding the geographic footprint or sampling frequency of regional biodiversity survey programs.Fil: Montes, Enrique. NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory; Estados UnidosFil: Lefcheck, Jonathan. Charles Darwin Foundation Santa Cruz; EcuadorFil: Bigatti, Gregorio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia "San Juan Bosco"; Argentina. Universidad Espíritu Santo; EcuadorFil: Guerra-Castro, Edlin. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Klein, Eduardo. Universidad Simón Bolívar; VenezuelaFil: Kavanaugh, Maria T.. Oregon State University; Estados UnidosFil: de Azevedo Mazzuco, Ana Carolina. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BrasilFil: Cordeiro, Cesar A.M.M.. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; BrasilFil: Simoes, Nuno. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México. Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi; Estados UnidosFil: Macaya, Erasmo C.. Universidad de Concepción; ChileFil: Moity, Nicolas. Charles Darwin Foundation; EcuadorFil: Londoño-Cruz, Edgardo. Universidad del Valle; ColombiaFil: Helmuth, Brian. Northeastern University; Estados UnidosFil: Choi, Francis. Northeastern University; Estados UnidosFil: Soto, Eulogio H.. Universidad de Valparaíso; ChileFil: Miloslavich, Patricia. University of Delaware; Estados UnidosFil: Muller-Karger, Frank E.. University of South Florida; Estados Unido